en.news
101.9K

Bishops See Off Cardinal Tagle with “You’ll Never Walk Alone” (Video)

Cardinal Tagle who doesn’t dress as a priest, was sent off by ninety Filipino bishops, most of them also secularised. At a January 26 gathering in Manila, before Tagle left for Rome, where he will be …More
Cardinal Tagle who doesn’t dress as a priest, was sent off by ninety Filipino bishops, most of them also secularised.
At a January 26 gathering in Manila, before Tagle left for Rome, where he will be the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples, they sang for him the tearjerker “You’ll never walk alone.”
The song from the 1945 Rodgers and Hammerstein musical Carousel is usually performed by supporters before a football match.
Fifty years after Second Vatican Council, it doesn’t surprise that this is the intellectual, cultural and emotional level of a gathering of Catholic bishops.
#newsDczwckyroy
Thors Catholic Hammer
The appointments of any antipope such as bergoglio are not licit.
Tagle has no legal spiritual authority over any catholic
.
The formerly catholic college of Roman cardinals is being turned is being turned into the equivalent of the Kit Kat club portrayed in the film Cabaret.
www.youtube.com/watch
Thors Catholic Hammer
Thor’s Hammer, like truth itself, is a mighty weapon.
I seek to use catholic truth to smash falsehoods.
Many of the greatest falsehoods are sadly in the heads of a great many Catholics.
This number has increased with the arrival in the catholic world of its most recent antipope , the apostate excommunicated Bergoglio.
Does this help?
Thors Catholic Hammer
Part of Thor’s Catholic Hammer has always been used to irritate English grammar Nazis.
(I understood punctuation was part of grammatical structure but no doubt you will correct me on that point.)
Ultraviolet
"Thor’s Hammer, like truth itself, is a mighty weapon. I seek to use catholic truth to smash falsehoods."
:D :D :D ...which explains why you run screaming from "catholic truth" whenever it contradicts your world-view.... why you'll loudly claim "you haven't supplied one example of heresy" right after I've linked a page presenting no less than nine of them. Like here:
www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-…More
"Thor’s Hammer, like truth itself, is a mighty weapon. I seek to use catholic truth to smash falsehoods."

:D :D :D ...which explains why you run screaming from "catholic truth" whenever it contradicts your world-view.... why you'll loudly claim "you haven't supplied one example of heresy" right after I've linked a page presenting no less than nine of them. Like here:

www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-heresiesofb16.htm

Thor's hammer was a pagan myth. It's also something wielded by a Marvel comic book character who appeared the same year as Vatican Council II.
Thors Catholic Hammer
To Ultraviolet.
You obviously do not read either what you post yourself or what other people post diligently or correctly.
Your claim that other popes in office promulgated heresies is dismissed out of hand.
The links you posted indeed show heresies by Ratzinger but not promulgated after he was elected pope.
You have enormous difficulty I. Understanding what a man does before and after he is pope. …More
To Ultraviolet.
You obviously do not read either what you post yourself or what other people post diligently or correctly.
Your claim that other popes in office promulgated heresies is dismissed out of hand.
The links you posted indeed show heresies by Ratzinger but not promulgated after he was elected pope.

You have enormous difficulty I. Understanding what a man does before and after he is pope.

This type of confusion characterizes all those unfortunate deluded Catholics who still think , against the enormous evidence, that Bergolio is still some type of “pope”.
Thors Catholic Hammer
Yes. I follow all that. Your position is that of the late Lord Denning who stated in relation to the Birmingham Six convictions ““Just consider the course of events if their action were to proceed to trial… If the six men failed it would mean that much time and money and worry would have been expended by many people to no good purpose. If they won, it would mean that the police were guilty of …More
Yes. I follow all that. Your position is that of the late Lord Denning who stated in relation to the Birmingham Six convictions ““Just consider the course of events if their action were to proceed to trial… If the six men failed it would mean that much time and money and worry would have been expended by many people to no good purpose. If they won, it would mean that the police were guilty of perjury; that they were guilty of violence and threats; that the confessions were involuntary and improperly admitted in evidence; and that the convictions were erroneous… That was such an appalling vista that every sensible person would say, ‘It cannot be right that these actions should go any further”
Your argument is the appalling vista one..

Denning was wrong and the men’s convictions were overturned.

The college of cardinals has demonstrated itself to be doctrinally corrupt.
The Synod on the family 1st relation and the St Gallen group demonstrate that along with the lies and heresies spoken by many so called cardinals.

The man they allegedly elected as pope is doctrinally corrupt.
He promotes formal heresy in relation to the Sixth Commandment of God.


I don’t have the solution to this disaster but the first step requires the immediate removal of Bergoglio aka “Francis” from any official ecclesiastical position.
Ultraviolet
"Your claim that other popes in office promulgated heresies is dismissed out of hand."
Someday you're going to have to learn that these claims mean nothing without proof. You can SAY you "dismissed" something "out of hand" but you haven't actually shown any valid proof that would lead to doing so. It's just more noise from you.
"The links you posted indeed show heresies by Ratzinger but not …More
"Your claim that other popes in office promulgated heresies is dismissed out of hand."

Someday you're going to have to learn that these claims mean nothing without proof. You can SAY you "dismissed" something "out of hand" but you haven't actually shown any valid proof that would lead to doing so. It's just more noise from you.

"The links you posted indeed show heresies by Ratzinger but not promulgated after he was elected pope."

Perfect example of my last point. That's an unsupported claim by you. No evidence shown that he has not.

But if you'd like heresies "promulgated" by Benedict XVI -as- Pope. Those are readily found.

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/anti-pope-bened…

"This type of confusion characterizes all those unfortunate deluded Catholics who still think , against the enormous evidence, that Bergolio is still some type of "pope"."

The only delusion here is your selective focus on heresy.

The last four popes were techncially "heretics" according to some critics. For whatever fatuous reason you've just decided to ignore all of those heretical papacies and focus exclusively on Francis. That's the lowest form of hypocristy. It shows a cynical and complete disregard for the Church law and Church teachings. For you, they're just "tools" to use against Pope Francis, and like any tools, you toss them away when you're done using them for that purpose.

What you've shown, time and again here, is you don't in the slightest bit care about any of the Church's laws and teachings. If you did, you'd be every bit as concerned about the previous "heretical" papacies, the way genuine legally-focused Catholics are, even if those popes weren't as aggressively malign as Francis.