@Ultraviolet See, this is why you should just be quiet. You don't know anything about the case. Not. A. Thing. In fact the "victim" sells nude pics of herself on porno website that are run by her father. The defendant is a man with the intellect of a 7 year old.

I asked for prayers for my friend and her family who are truly suffering. If this were a cut and dry case I never would've asked for that prayer. But that is YOU projecting your hatred on to me.

You are an evil, evil little person who is so consumed with hate for me personally that you'll bear false witness and actually call ME a pedophile and a groomer, which is 100 percent libel and more than that completely Satanic instead of seeing the humanity in this case.

This is how I know you don't take your faith seriously. And this is how I know you don't go to confession. And this is how I know you're a fraud.

And you will never get rid of me. You've called down the thunder, to quote a cowboy movie, a now you've got it.

I will always call you out.

@Ultraviolet this "general definition" is included in the Catholic definition. Cardinal Marx could have sex with another man on the altar and you would defend him. You defend all immoral actions by claiming we have no "authority" to call them immoral. That's all this is.

Your biggest lie is that these accusations are "baseless". Only a coward and/or approver of these actions would say these accusations are "baseless".

If you actually used Catholic sources, Canon Law, scripture and Church teaching, you'd say the same things, or most certainly entertain the notion. But "baseless"?

Are you even Catholic?

Irony: defending Catholic apostates heretics by accusing the accusers of not being Catholic enough.

@michael newman your definition is actually fine, it aligns with Catholic sources.