I am a Catholic person just like you, now instead of looking excuses about attacking you should consider that you have a slight problem with the English language, because that is the only explanation why you are writing such a dangerous thing, THE HOLY SPIRIT IS NOT THE POPE and pointing out his errors is NOT a sin, I just told you what happened with the first pope peter how he was rebuked, whoever rebuked him has also committed a sin? there has been MANY anti-popes in the past... so before you write things without no biblical backing and no knowledge of history please think twice, before saying something which is NOT true, pointing out errors from the pope is NOT talking against the Holy Spirit. Did you know that Benedict XVI was asked if the pope was elected by the Holy Spirit... in thet case he said: NO! He said no because there has been MANY ANTIPOPES. May Jesus gives you tons of His Mercy.

We are on the same side Ivik - on God's side.
What we have to do is keep our Faith pure for Jesus.
In Poland we have still a lot of good priest but in Germany there many schismatics and heretics among the priests - especially Bishops are far away from Catholic Faith.

As to MDM, England was just after Jesus was 12 years old.
3 Kings countries visiting (as Emmich wrote) was during the Jesus teaching after Jesus was 30 years old.
Egypt was in childhood.
Just wanted to say that England is not contrary to the Bible - and nothing more.

"to be against pope Francis (or any pope before ) is sin against the Holly Spirit"
Of Course not.
So show where is this written in the Canon Law.
I will obey Francis till his teaching will be OK to the Bible.

Francis: I hope that he will be a rock of the Church, but till now
there is as long what he should do as the pope and he did not.
He is also breaking our tradition, also the Canon Law - in The Great Thursday.
Well in internet you will find a lot of examples
and do not want to start discussion about him.

I'll be happy if he will be a good pope.
If he will be turning into heresy then you cannot go after him.
Pls have your eyes open - that's all I am asking.

If yo didn't agree with what Jesus said to Peter and the rebuke of apostol Paul then the problem is you ivic I'm sorry I'm done discussing this since you don't have ANY biblical back up to solidify your claims, I'll pray that one day you understand the clear error you are embracing saying that talking agaisnt the pppe is talking against the Holy Spirit, that statement if it were true then Paul clearly made a mistake and Jesus as well, which IS NOT THE CASE, I guess your problem is the language barrier, maybe that's it because it is a grave mistake saying something that is NOT in the bible. Blessings.

A ty kos chłopino skądżeś się tu nam przyplątał?

Akurat nam brakowało następnego nawiedzonego.

Redakcyja weźmie i uprzątnie to to!

Dear Ivik,
Catherine Emmerich the saint, told that the Jesus during His teaching years travelled to the countries of 3 Kings and felt down more then 3 times during the way to Calvary.
Is she from the devil? No just told something more then we knew before.
Do you know exactly where was the Jesus after He was 12 years old - I don't and nobody knows. England is not contrary to the Bible - He could be there, why not? - it is possible.
Was Jesus all the 20 years (about) in one place only? This looks impossible.

If Francis teaching will be the same as the Bible, he can be called the pope for sure if not, then you know the answer.
The pope Benedict was sentenced for 25y by the Court in Brussels and have to resign not to be arrested. It was the conspiracy and the Benedict was ousted in an illegal way.
So who is the pope in the eyes of our God? I am not sure - but after some time we will know this for sure.
In our history there were a few anti popes - you should know this. To obey any anti pope before was not good.
Canon Law:
First to Obey is the God, second the Bible, the third to obey is the pope.
If the pope will be against the Bible you cannot obey the pope.
Pls have your eyes open.

The unknown years of Jesus (also called his silent years, lost years, or missing years) generally refers to the period between Jesus's childhood and the beginning of his ministry, a period not described in the New Testament.
The phrases "lost years of Jesus" is usually encountered in esoteric literature, (where it at times also refers to his possible post-crucifixion activities) but is not commonly used in scholarly literature since it is assumed that Jesus was probably working as a carpenter in Galilee from the age of twelve till thirty, so the years were not "lost years", and that he died in Calvary.In the late medieval period, Arthurian legends appeared that the young Jesus had been in Britain. In the 19th and 20th centuries theories began to emerge that between the ages of 12 and 30 Jesus had visited India, or had studied with the Essenes in the Judeadesert.Modern mainstream Christian scholarship has generally rejected these theories and holds that nothing is known about this time period in the life of Jesus.
The story of Jesus visiting Britain as a boy is a late medieval development based on legends connected with Joseph of Arimathea. During the late 12th century, Joseph of Arimathea became connected with the Arthurian cycle, appearing in them as the first keeper of the Holy Grail. This idea first appears in Robert de Boron's Joseph d'Arimathie, in which Joseph receives the Grail from an apparition of Jesus and sends it with his followers to Britain. This theme is elaborated upon in Boron's sequels and in subsequent Arthurian works penned by others.
Some Arthurian legends hold that Jesus traveled to Britain as a boy, lived at Priddy in the Mendips, and built the first wattle cabin at Glastonbury. William Blake's early 19th century poem And did those feet in ancient time was inspired by the story of Jesus traveling to Britain.