OCTOBER 7, 2017
SSPX canonical recognition is assured : Vatican Council II (premise-free) is no more an issue
They simply have to announce that they affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and all the other doctrinal teachings of the Catholic Church.They do not reject Vatican Council II (premise-free).Instead they reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise.So they are endorsing a premise-free Vatican Council II and demand canonical recognition.The Council is interpreted without assuming invisible people are visible,without claiming unknown people are known examples of salvation outside the Church.This premise-free Vatican Council II is rational and traditional.It is not a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.The SSPX affirms the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as being hypothetical cases.Theoretically they would have to be followed …More

OCTOBER 6, 2017
Vatican should apologize for the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney
The Vatican should apologize for the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney.Since we now know that they both were doctrinally correct.Invisiblefor us baptism of desire,baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance cannot bevisible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no practical exceptions to EENS in 2017.
Similarly Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 etc in Vatican Council II are not known cases of someone saved outside the Church.So Vatican Council II isnot a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.Pre and post Vatican Council II exclusivist ecclesiology is the same.
The popes since Pius …More

OCTOBER 5, 2017
God bless Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for rejecting irrational Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and opposing a magisterium in heresy, in schism with the past magisterium
God bless Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for rejecting irrational Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and opposing a magisterium in heresy and in schism with the past magisterium.
Archbishop Lefebvre had integrity and courage. He is a modern day Athanasius.
We know things now that he did not at that time.
Pope Paul VI made a mistake. A factual and objective mistake.He overlooked what could have been a con job.The work of ecclesiastical Masonry.
With Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) interpreted as being a known and physically visible case saved outside the Church, Vatican Council II had to become a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus itself was changed in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Officewhen invincible ignorance etc was assumed to be a personally …More

October 4, 2017
SSPX must continue to reject Vatican Council II (Cushingite) : do not compromise like Card. Raymond Burke, Michael Voris and others.
The SSPX must continue to reject Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and not accept it as does Cardinal Raymond Burke, Michael Voris and others.
They need to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and ask Cardinal Burke to do the same.Tell him he is in heresy presently.
Do not compromise like them.
Cardinal Burke and Michael Voris do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus without assuming invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions. So for them all do not need to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation since invisible and unknown people are visible and known exceptions to the dogma EENS.They also do not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to known and …More

October 4, 2017
Secret of SSPX General Chapter Statement unknown to bishops : there are no possibile exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II
The secret for the solution of the SSPX Reconciliation lies in the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012, which the Vatican rejected.
The SSPX bishops still do not realize that when the General Chapter Statement affirmed outside the Church there is no salvation with no possible exceptions the Statement was saying that there are no possibile exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in Vatican Council II.
Here it is:
we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation 1
Here lies the SSPX's strong point, nay,clinching point in any negotiations with the Vatican, for canonical status.But the SSPX bishops do not know about this.
Probably only the prayers of the faithful will bring the grace to allow this point to 'sink in'. …More

OCTOBER 3, 2017
Simple way for the SSPX to show Card.Burke that they are not in schism
For Cardinal Raymond Burke not to say that the SSPX is in schism they simply have to 1) affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) 2) along with invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).
Then they have to inform the Vatican that they endorse EENS(with no exceptions) and they also endorse Vatican Council II (with no known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the old ecclesiology).That's all that there is to it.
Upon the old ecclesiology is based the ecumenism of return, non Catholics needing to be incorporated into the Church as members to avoid Hell and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation with the non separation of Church and State.
So then the SSPX cannot be said to be in schism since they accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite),while Cardinal Burke …More

October 3, 2017
A priest cannot really know if a couple in concubinage are living as brother and sister : Obfuscation Principle in Amoris Laetitia overlooked in salvation theology by Cardinal Burke
A priest cannot visit a young unmarried couple living together and assume they are loving as brother and sister- even if they say so.
Neither can he tell them to follow their conscience and continue to do so.
Humanly speaking there is no way that he can know that a particular couple is an exception to the teaching on mortal sin and will not be going to Hell.There cannot physically be an exception to the teaching on mortal sin since finally only Jesus will know the exact state of the soul of an un-married couple living together or that of the case of the divorced and re-married.There can be no known exception for the priest.
If the priest says that a particular couple is an exception then he is saying that what is unknowable is knowable for him.He is mixing up what is only known to God as being …More

OCTOBER 2, 2017
Two popes and cardinals have made an in principle mistake in faith and morals : physically invisible is visible for them
POPES AND CARDINALS HAVE MADE AN IN PRINCIPLE MISTAKE IN FAITH AND MORALS.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Burke have made an in principle mistake in faith and morals since we cannot judge exceptions to the general rule on mortal sin and exclusive salvation.
MORALS/MORTAL SIN
We cannot say that any particular couple who is living in concubinage is living as a brother and sister. This is something only God can know.
We cannot tell a couple who are divorced and remarried that they are not in mortal sin since they are following their conscience.
In principle we cannot physically know of any exception to the general teaching on mortal sin. SALVATION/FAITH Similarly we cannot say that every one in the USA or Italy does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church since there could be exceptions of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible …More

OCTOBER 2, 2017
Cardinal Burke has made an in principle mistake in faith and morals since we cannot judge exceptions to the general rule on mortal sin and exclusive salvation
Pope Francis named Cardinal Raymond Burke on September 30 a member of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura
Lionel:
Cardinal Raymond Burke does not have to refuse the nomination.
He needs to clarify that we cannot use Philosophical Subjectivism in the interpretation of faith and morals. We cannot change Catholic salvation and moral theology with the Obfuscation Principle.
The mistake he and Dr.Joseph Shaw are making is that they assume there are known cases of couples divorced and remarried who are living as brothers and sisters; who are living chaste.If there were - this would not be known to us. So they are not exceptions or relevant to the traditional moral teaching on mortal sin.
Neither can we know the conscience of any particular person in manifest mortal sin, to say that the person is an exception. …More

OCTOBER 2, 2017
The issue is Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and they don't know: Cardinal Burke on SSPX schism
The issue is Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
The SSPX has to simply affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and reject the Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which is accepted by the Vatican and Cardinal Raymond Burke. The SSPX must continue to reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite).
Then it cannot be said that they are in schism.
Instead they should ask the two popes and Cardinal Burke to accept Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) instead of Vatican Council II( Cushingite) otherwise they would be in heresy.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) is in harmony with the old ecclesiology of the Church, so there would be no change for the SSPX on the issue of ecumenism and outside the Church there being no salvation.
With the old ecclesiology intact theologically there would be no basis for the Vatican supporting the new theology and salvation outside the Church.-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 2, 2017
Hugh Hefner is howling in Hell : Fr.Longenecker's Amoris Laetitia morality is not sure
Fr.Dwight Longenecker is not sure if Hugh Hefner is in Hell since a few moments before he died he could have repented he writes.1For me this is the Amoris Laetitia new morality.
For Fr.Longenecker the norm is not Jesus' teaching on adultery,fornication and sexual immorality but a theoretical possibility which is made an exception.An unknown factor is considered a known exception to the Biblical norm.So he cannot outright say that Hefner is in Hell.
For me Hugh Hefner is in Hell and if it would theoretically be assumed that he is not, this would be known only to God.So it is not an exception when I say that Hefner is in Hell based on the teachings of the Catholic Church or morals which cannot be changed.
Hugh Hefner is in Hell. The Catholic Church guided by the Holy Spirit makes me say this.It is not because I can judge.
Fr.Longenecker does not know if Hefner repented while the Bible …More

Pope Francis has supported the Obfuscation Principle in the interpretation of Catholic morals and salvation. The confusion is there in his statement in Columbia on Amoris Laetitia being Thomistic.
The Obfuscation Principle is mixing up what cannot be known as being known, it is a false reasoning. It's subterfuge.It is philophical subterfuge used to change the traditional doctrines of the Catholic Church.
He rejects traditional exclusivist salvation in the Catholic Church by assuming unknown cases of the baptism of desire etc are known and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.So they become examples of salvation outside the Church when there are no such cases.There are no practical exceptions in 2017.
Similarly he rejects traditional teachings of Jesus on morals by assuming there are known exceptions of Catholics living in mortal sin who will not be going to Hell, or, after Amoris Laetitia, who can be given the Eucharist, for example, the divorced and remarried.
In …More

Pope Francis says:
To those who maintain that the morality underlying the document is not “a Catholic morality” or a morality that can be certain or sure, “I want to repeat clearly that the morality of ‘Amoris Laetitia’ is Thomist,” that is, built on the moral philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, he said.
Lionel: False it is not Thomist.Instead it is a negation of the morality of St.Thomas Aquinas and St. Alphonsus Liguouri.The philosophical subjectivism in Amoris Laetitia is not Catholic.It is an innovation in the Church.
The same philosophical subjectivism is used by the two popes to reject exclusivist salvation theology held by St. Thomas Aquinas and St.Alphonsus Liguori.
There are no visible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2017 to contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was taught by St. Thomas Aquinas. Yet for Pope Francis these hypothetical cases can be known and seen in the present times and so they are …More

September 28, 2017
63 scholars do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, interpret Vatican Council with an irrationality and have changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed
They do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
“There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)
“We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)
“The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical …More