Lionel L. Andrades

DANTE 'S EXPERIENCE OF HELL SIMILAR TO CATHOLIC SAINTS

Dante's description of Hell is similar to that of St. Faustina Kowalski ( Diary) and St.Teresa of Avila ( Life-Autobiography). It is similar to that of Sister Lucia at Fatima. People in the present …More
Dante's description of Hell is similar to that of St. Faustina Kowalski ( Diary) and St.Teresa of Avila ( Life-Autobiography).
It is similar to that of Sister Lucia at Fatima.
People in the present times have seen Hell. They include the visionaries at Medugorje.
There are descriptions of Hell on the Internet by many people who have changed their life after they went to Hell and returned back to earth to tell us about it. There description of Hell is similar to that of Dante and the Catholic saints.One of them is the Catholic doctor, Gloria Polo.
04:11

ITALIAN NEWSPAPERS CONTINUE CAMPAIGN AGAINST CATHOLIC CHURCH DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM …

The Italian newspaper continue to spread confusion on Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Vatican Council II is in harmony with 'the rigorist' interpretation of the dogma …More
The Italian newspaper continue to spread confusion on Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Vatican Council II is in harmony with 'the rigorist' interpretation of the dogma on all needing to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation. All with no known exceptions.Vatican Council II supports the Feeneyite interpretation of no salvation outside the Church.
The Italian newspapers in their interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church, mix up what is hypothetical as being objective, what is invisible as being visible.
In this way, with an irrational premise and conclusion, they produce a non traditional and irrational conclusion.Then they project this error as being the new teaching of the Catholic Church.
If the irrational premise and conclusion is avoided,Vatican Council II supports the old ecclesiology upon which was based the old eccumenism and the doctrine on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
More
06:13

WHAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHES

When I say that I affirm 'the rigorist' interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also Vatican Council II, I am doing so based on the teachings of the Church. I say this based on …More
When I say that I affirm 'the rigorist' interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also Vatican Council II, I am doing so based on the teachings of the Church. I say this based on magisterial documents including Vatican Council II.
I am not a traditionalist or sedevacantist who rejects Vatican Council II.
Secondly when I affirm the Feeneyite intepretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus I also affirm the baptism of desire.I do not reject either.
For me the baptism of desire refers to an invisible case in the present times. So it is not an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
For the traditionalists, sedevacantists and liberals the baptism of desire refers to a visible case. Or at least this is what they imply when they consider it an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This was the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which the whole Church has accepted. So with theology derailed with an irrationality …More
01:17

IL CONCILIO VATICANO II E EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

L'interpretazione Feeneyite del dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus è supportato dal Concilio Vaticano II. Il dogma non è cambiato prima e dopo il Concilio Vaticano II. Lumen Gentium 16 si riferisce a …More
L'interpretazione Feeneyite del dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus è supportato dal Concilio Vaticano II.
Il dogma non è cambiato prima e dopo il Concilio Vaticano II.
Lumen Gentium 16 si riferisce a un caso invisibile e quindi non può essere un'eccezione al dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Mentre Ad Gentes 7 supporta l'interpretazione Feeneyite del dogma, quando afferma tutti bisogno di fede e il battesimo per la salvezza.
La Lettera del Sant'Uffizio 1949 l'arcivescovo di Boston ha fatto un errore quando si presume che il battesimo di desiderio e un caso visibile e conosciuto.
Non c'e alcun caso noto del battesimo di desiderio. Così non è mai stato una eccezione per l'interpretazione Feeneyite del dogma sulla salvezza esclusivo.
Quando la Lettera del Sant'Uffizio 1949 disse che tutti non hanno bisogno di essere incorporati nella Chiesa per la salvezza contraddiceva il dogma che dice al contrario.
Senza questo errore nella Lettera l'interpretazione del dogma extra ecclesiam nulla …
More
03:52

BEDA PONTIFICAL COLLEGE : THEY TEACH THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS VISIBLE

AUGUST 26, 2012
PROPAGANDA FIDE IS GIVING OUT THOUSANDS OF EUROS TO THE BEDA PONTIFICAL SEMINARY IN ROME WHICH TEACHES THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS VISIBLE TO US.
Propaganda Fide, Vatican is giving out millions of euros to finance seminarians in the Pontifical colleges who are being taught that we can see the dead (saved) who are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.
The colleges have used this irrationality to say that the Church has changed its teachings after Vatican Council II.
At the Beda Pontifical College, the English seminary in Rome under the bishops of England and Wales for late vocations, they cannot cite any text from Vatican Council II which states that there are known exceptions to the dogma, or that these cases, now dead, are known to us on earth, for them to be exceptions.
The Rector Mons. Roderick Strange will say that Jesus died for all and that salvation is open to all. He cannot say that all need to …More
03:19

Irish Catholic Seminary in Rome : Irrational Philosophy and Theology

NOVEMBER 3, 2016 Irrational premises and conclusions: there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II IRRATIONAL PREMISES The irrational premise is that invisible things or persons are …More
NOVEMBER 3, 2016
Irrational premises and conclusions: there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II
IRRATIONAL PREMISES
The irrational premise is that invisible things or persons are visible.
The irrational premise is that hypothetical cases are objectively visible in 2016.
The irrational premise is that the baptism of desire refers to personally known cases in 2016.
The irrational premise is assuming there are objectively seen and known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in 2016.
The irrational premise is assuming others could see invisible cases in the present and the past.It was assuming that the baptism of desire refers to a known case in the past. _______________________________________ IRRATIONAL CONCLUSIONS So every one does not need to be incorporated into the Catholic Church in 2016 since there are exceptions.There are known people saved without the baptism of water. So every Protestant does not need to formally …More
03:36

THE ORIGIN OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS DIVINE

This is the only Church Jesus founded outside of which there is no salvation.More
This is the only Church Jesus founded outside of which there is no salvation.
01:59
Lionel L. Andrades
626

GESU AL CENTRO PONTE MILVIO 2011

C'era una programma di Gesù al Centro per i giovani della diocesi di Rome.Sarebbe andati per le strade di Roma con la loro musica e la testimonianza di fede e amore per Gesù.Ormai vietati di …More
C'era una programma di Gesù al Centro per i giovani della diocesi di Rome.Sarebbe andati per le strade di Roma con la loro musica e la testimonianza di fede e amore per Gesù.Ormai vietati di autorita civica di Roma. Non hanno il permesso a Roma per parlare sul loro fede cattolica.
Questo programma è organizzato dal Vicariato di Roma ogni anno.
In questo video a Ponte Milvio questi giovani cattolici erano proclamando Gesù senza la necessità della Chiesa per la salvezza.
Loro negavano il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus e anche il Concilio Vaticano II (AG 7, LG 14).Loro negavano Giov.3:5 e Marco 16:16.
Sono considerati i mezzi straordinari di salvezza non solo come possibilità, ma esplicite eccezioni per la necessità per tutti per entrare nella Chiesa nei tempi attuali per la salvezza.

There was a Gesu al Centro program for youth from the diocese of Rome.They would go out on the streets of Rome with their music and testimony of Jesus.The civic authorities have now prohibited it.They …More
07:36
Lionel L. Andrades
599

IL CONCILIO VATICANO II DICE FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA NON CE SALVEZZA

IL CONCILIO VATICANO II DICE FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA NON CE SALVEZZA Il Concilio Vaticano II dice che fuori della chiesa cattolica non ce salvezza. Extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Sorpreso? …More
IL CONCILIO VATICANO II DICE FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA NON CE SALVEZZA
Il Concilio Vaticano II dice che fuori della chiesa cattolica non ce salvezza. Extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Sorpreso?
La Chiesa Cattolica insegna dopo Concilio Vaticano II (1965) che tutta la gente ha bisogno entrare nella Chiesa Cattolica per andare a cielo ( Ad Gentes 7, Concilio Vaticano II).
La Fede Cattolica con il battesimo dell'acqua è la via normale, senso ordinario di salvezza per tutta la gente (Lumen Gentium 14, Concilio Vaticano II).
La Chiesa Cattolica è il senso ordinario di salvezza per tutta la gente (Lumen Gentium 14). Tuttavia i non cattolici possono essere salvi con i mezzi straordinari di salvezza (Lumen Gentium 16).
Soltanto il Dio conosce chi sono le non-Cattolici salve con i mezzi straordinari di salvezza; le eccezioni. Noi non conosciamo chi sono le eccezioni.
Noi non possiamo giudicare. Gesù, la Chiesa, la Sacra Scrittura e il Concilio Vaticano II indicano che la priorità è la …
More
03:13
Lionel L. Andrades
991

MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGIS TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION USES A MANTRA LINKED TO LUCIFER

Wednesday, December 28, 2011 MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGIS TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION USES A MANTRA LINKED TO LUCIFER Hirim is a word known to Freemasonary and is associated with Satan accordi…More
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGIS TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION USES A MANTRA LINKED TO LUCIFER
Hirim is a word known to Freemasonary and is associated with Satan according to Fr. Paolo Siano F.I in the recent issue of the weekly Il Settimanale di Padre Pio. Hirim is mentioned in the official list of mantras of Transcendental Meditation.
I was reading an article on Freemasonary in the magazine Il Settimanale di Padre Pio of the Franciscans of the Immaculate. It mentions a name for Lucifer. This article is one of a series on the same subject. The word 'hiram' is connected with Satan. The word seemed familiar to me.I was wondering if it was the same word used as a mantra in Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's Transcendental Meditation.
I was a teacher of Transcendental Meditation(TM) and completed a five months course for teachers at Pattaya, Thailand. We had to sign a document saying that we would keep the mantras secret . The mantras are given out according to a …More
03:53

BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON MAKES A DOCTRINAL ERROR -2

Bishops Williamson, Pirvanus,Dolan and Sanborn are under no compulsion to say B is an exception to A Bishop Richard Williamson, Bishop Mark Piravanus, Bishop Daniel Dolan and Bishop Donald Sanborn …More
Bishops Williamson, Pirvanus,Dolan and Sanborn are under no compulsion to say B is an exception to A
Bishop Richard Williamson, Bishop Mark Piravanus, Bishop Daniel Dolan and Bishop Donald Sanborn are interpreting LG 14 and AG 7 with B being an exception to A.1
Bishop Willlaimson when he was a priest is reported to have placed information on Feeneyism, on the website of the SSPX. It is probably still there. It considers B an exception to A and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The bishop supported the Letter of the Holy Office and was not aware of the mistake made by the Holy Office 1949.
The same error can be read on the website of the sedevacantists CMRI(
Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI). There is an article on the baptism of desire which has been approved by Bishop Mark Piravanus.
The sedevacantists at St. Gertrude the Great Church, USA also use the Marchetti premise and inference. This can be read on line in articles written by Bishop Donald Sanborn. It …
More
01:45
Lionel L. Andrades
Like the other bishops of the SSPX and many SSPX priests, Bishop Richard Williamson refers to the 'extraordinary way' of salvation. This is Rahneria…More
Like the other bishops of the SSPX and many SSPX priests, Bishop Richard Williamson refers to the 'extraordinary way' of salvation. This is Rahnerian theology.
For us human beings there cannot be an extra ordinary means of salvation, since we cannot see or know any one saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. There is only the ordinary means of salvation which is faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.All need to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation.
This was not so with Fr.Karl Rahner s.j.For him and Cardinal Ratzinger there was known salvation outside the Church, there were known cases of non Catholics saved without the baptism of water and Catholic faith.So for them there were exceptions to the old ecclesiology.There was an extra ordinary means of salvation.
Bishop Williamson repeats the same error.This is bad philosophy.
He is in accord with the two popes and the liberal theologians whom he otherwise considers modernist.
It is when he …
More

BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON MAKES A DOCTRINAL ERROR -1

A case of bad philosophy creating a bad theology.Then the same irrationality is used to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.…More
A case of bad philosophy creating a bad theology.Then the same irrationality is used to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.He was not aware of the error in the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston 1949. The Letter assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc were visible. It wrongly assumed hypothetical cases were not hypothetical but objectively visible.
The good Bishop uses this reasoning. So for him Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) would refer to visible cases of persons saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. For me LG 16 refers to an invisible case. So it is not relevant or an exception to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
For me Vatican Council II does not contradict with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
Bishop Williamson's reasoning however is the same as the liberals and the Vatican Curia.
02:22
Lionel L. Andrades
Bishop Richard Williamson will consecrate a new bishop not knowing all this Bishop Richard Williamson and the SSPX (Resistance) still do not know …More
Bishop Richard Williamson will consecrate a new bishop not knowing all this
Bishop Richard Williamson and the SSPX (Resistance) still do not know the following.
The Good Thief on the Cross or St.Emerentiana cannot be exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma. Since they existed centuries back. Exceptions must exist in the present times. Something or someone can only be an exception today. A possibility cannot be an exception to the dogma today.
Every exception to all needing the baptism of water for salvation has to happen today.Otherwise it will not be an exception today.
An exception to the dogma on salvation must happen in the present times, today,living memory, existing time, visible and concrete, March 19,2015, Feast of St.Joseph.
Something in the past cannot be an exception to the dogma on March 19.Something that will happen in the future cannot be an exception to the dogma on outside the church there is no salvation.This is elementary. Something that happens …More

CAN ECONE CHANGE ITS FORMATION

Irrationality is being taught officially by the SSPX at Econe, Switzerland.
02:01
Lionel L. Andrades
Archbishop Gerhard Muller says that the SSPX needs to distinguish the true teaching of the Second Vatican Council: but he will not correct Reuters.More
Archbishop Gerhard Muller says that the SSPX needs to distinguish the true teaching of the Second Vatican Council: but he will not correct Reuters.
December 20, 2012
Reuters keeps repeating that Vatican Council II has changed the Church's teachings on other religions.(1) Is this is the true teaching of the Second Vatican Council II which the SSPX must accept?
Does the SSPX have to accept the Reuters theological understanding of Vatican Council II?
Reuters has made an objective error. It is a factual mistake, which is influencing their theology.They have used an irrational premise and so have a non traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.
When Archbishop Muller says that the SSPX needs to distinguish the true teaching of the Second Vatican Council II he is not implying that the Reuters version is the correct one?
Unfortunately neither has the SSPX issued a clarification over the Reuters report which was picked up by many newspapers.
The clarification could have simply said …More
Lionel L. Andrades
SSPX WILL AGAIN LET ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER GO UNANSWERED ? December 19, 2012 Once again in the interview with The Catholic Herald U.K…More
SSPX WILL AGAIN LET ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER GO UNANSWERED ?
December 19, 2012
Once again in the interview with The Catholic Herald U.K and on the blog The Path Less Taken Archbishop Gerhard Muller is drawing on theology and doctrine to criticize the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) and the SSPX is not saying that Vatican Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are traditional if you do not use the premise of the dead who are saved being visible to us.
Both Archbishop Gerhard Muller and the SSPX use this false premise and so we have a modernist innterpretation of the Council, approved by the left.
If there are any SSPX priests who understand what I am saying here, probably they have to be quiet out of obedience and let the propaganda continue against the SSPX on the issue of doctrine when the Council really supports the SSPX.
-Lionel Andrades
SSPX LETS ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER GO UNANSWERED
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/sspx-lets-archb…
View 2 more comments