@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori please brace yourself. What you have described is not what will happen. BerGOGlio has set in motion the Synod on Synodality. This process will invert the teaching mechanism of the Church. No longer will the teaching come down from God to man through his Holy Vicar (Benedict XVI was the final Pope, as St. Malachy prophesied), but, instead, the new, false teaching of the Counterfeit Church will come from "discerning" God's will by listening to the movement of the "Holy Spirit" (actually the unholy spirit of Satan) in the minds of the participants in the synodal process. The outcome of this synodal process will be the rejection of the objective, eternal Truth taught by Jesus and his One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church for 2000 years and its replacement with the humanistic dogmas of wokism and communism. The only sinners according to this Counterfeit Church will be the "backwardists" who hold unwaveringly to the traditional Truth taught by Jesus as we know them through the dogmas and doctrines of the Catholic Faith. We are near the "consummation of the age" (Matthew 24), prepare spiritually so that you are not deceived. May Our Lord and Our Lady guide you!

Hi Ivan. Yes, BerGOGlio is the prophesied figure "Gog" mentioned in Ezechiel and the Apocalypse, known also as "the Beast." His followers are "Magog," the Harlot of Babylon that "rides the Beast." The Beast is the Counterfeit Catholic Church, which includes its leader, the antipope BerGOGlio, and its members the false brethren. The Counterfeit Church is the mystical body of the Antichrist. The head of the Counterfeit is called the False Prophet/Antichrist/Leader of Magog/Beast/Little Horn/Man of Sin by various prophecies. This will become clearer to more people (but still only about 2 percent of Catholics) over the next few years.

The overwhelming majority of people will not be able to see deception this because, as 2 Thessalonians 2 says, God "will send them the operation of error to believe lying because they have loved sin more than the Truth." So don't get discouraged. Only a very, very tiny number of people "have eyes to see" right now. Those people are "little antichrists" who will apostasize from the True Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church and believe the deception (CCC 675-676).

We have years to go before all of this plays out. The Synod on Synodality is the opening battle. May God continue to shine His light on you!

@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Bergoglio is positioning the Counterfeit Church to be the recipient of enormous sums of money. When he officially inverts the doctrines of the Church, the enemies of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church will flood the Bergoglian Counterfeit Church with too much money to count. Then the Counterfeit Church will be the conduit for solving all of the "problems" of "the world." It will be a super global non-profit backed by every nation and every billionaire on the planet. But the biggest investor in the Anti-Church will be Satan.

This is what is meant in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, section 675, when it says that the Antichrist will propose "a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth." The Counterfeit Church will say that we must put aside our theological and moral differences so that we can tackle the world's problems together. And he will claim it is the Holy Spirit talking through him. He will be a new "Christ" come back to set the world right again.

The people who refuse to go along with him will be "persecuted" as haters and backwardists. But all we need to do is love and follow what Jesus taught and what his true Church has always taught. Keep the Commandments. Watch and pray. Use the "persecution" as an instrument of purification. Learn to hate the things of "the world" and love the things of God. And never forget that the good guys win in the end.

@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori The current law governing the papal election is the key. UDG was that law in 2013 and still is the law today with some minor modifications by Benedict XVI right before he "retired." Historical examples cannot supersede the current law.

We seem to agree that Bergoglio is not a legitimate Pope. This is the most important thing. But people need to understand that Benedict XVI is still the lawful Vicar of Christ. He is simply "retired." In his absence and until a new lawful Pope is elected AFTER Benedict's death, the Cardinal's power is extremely limited. UDG explains what those limits are.

But we mustn't think that Bergoglio has any legitimate power to do anything he has done. He was not appointed to the Curia by Benedict BEFORE the "retirement." Therefore, Bergoglio has no lawful authority to do anything. This is important to keep in mind for those people who are wringing their hands that Bergoglio is "destroying the Church." No, Bergoglio cannot destroy the true Church.

Instead he is erecting the "Counterfeit Church." He will be very successful from a numbers standpoint. The number of souls who will follow Bergoglio to hell will be unbelievable. But you must understand, Bergoglio is the False Prophet at the moment. In the very near future, either he will morph into the Antichrist or his immediate successor in the Counterfeit Church will be the prophesied Antichrist. Yes, we are that close to the consummation of the Age.

The big picture is that God is in control. Read the parable of the wheat and the tares. God is allowing everything to happen just as it has because He needs to allow people to choose their god. Will it be the True God, the Holy Trinity of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church or will it be the god of Humanism, Wokism and Fraternity.

Bianchi calls for "Eucharistic peace." The price of this false peace? That we "accept Francis' Petrine office." Do not fall for it. There will be "peace" only when that "peace" is according to the will of God.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is an antipope. He is not lawfully-elected to the papacy, according to the requirements of the Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis. The following site explains it all: Home | Antipope Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

Benedict XVI is still the legitimate Vicar of Christ, although he has stepped aside ordinary governance. In his absence, the Roman Curial officials that he appointed have the legal authority to run the day-to-day affairs of the Church. But nothing substantive can change in the absence of the Pope's signature.

Bergoglio's Curial government is as illegitimate as he is. All of them, including the Cardinals and diocesan bishops that the antipope has appointed have no governing authority in the Church.

But, do not worry, the gates of hell will not prevail, take refuge in Pope Benedict XVI. Pray for him in this time of need. We are in the times of the Apocalypse. Get serious about your Catholic Faith. Go to Confession weekly. Attend the TLM as often as possible. Pray the Rosary daily.

Yes, the interview is from 2016 after Amoris laetitia was published. It has relevance now because "The Year of Amoris Laetitia" just ended in June 2022 at the conclusion of the Tenth World Meeting of Families.

laityfamilylife.va/content/laityfamilylife/en/amoris-laetitia.html

@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Compare your description to that of the JPII Catechism. Note the words I emphasized and underlined in Section 677. The Church will, like Jesus, appear to die, but will be miraculously resurrected. This will come NOT THROUGH a triumph of the Church IN HISTORY, but ONLY BY God's victory. In other words, Jesus is our savior. We cannot save ourselves through our own efforts, our own institutions. This final trial will be a lesson to us that without Him we are nothing. You are setting yourself up for disappointment, if you believe the Church can overcome this final trial without Jesus's miraculous intervention. Instead, trust Jesus and Mary, pray and keep the Commandments. Don't set yourself up for disappointment by expecting something that is not prophesied and taught in the Catechism. May Our Lord bless you.

------------------

The Church's ultimate trial

675 Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers.573 The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth574 will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. the supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh.575

676 The Antichrist's deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgement. the Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism,576 especially the "intrinsically perverse" political form of a secular messianism.577

677 The Church will enter the glory of the kingdom only through this final Passover, when she will follow her Lord in his death and Resurrection.578 The kingdom will be fulfilled, then, not by a historic triumph of the Church through a progressive ascendancy, but only by God's victory over the final unleashing of evil, which will cause his Bride to come down from heaven.579 God's triumph over the revolt of evil will take the form of the Last Judgement after the final cosmic upheaval of this passing world.580

573 Cf. Lk 18:8; Mt 24:12.
574 Cf. Lk 21:12; Jn 15:19-20.
575 Cf. 2 Th 2:4-12; I Th 5:2-3; 2 Jn 7; I Jn 2:1 8, 22.
576 Cf. DS 3839.
577 Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, condemning the "false mysticism" of this "counterfeit of the redemption of the lowly"; cf. GS 20-21.
578 Cf. Rev 19:1-9.
579 Cf Rev 13:8; 20:7-10; 21:2-4.
580 Cf. Rev 20:12 2 Pt 3:12-13.

@porta folio manager Read Matthew 24. The "abomination of desolation" will be "in the holy place." Where do you think "the holy place" is for Jesus? Clearly inside His own Church, no? And how about all of His warnings about "false prophets?" Who do you think he's talking about? It is an antipope (a false papal claimant) who is "the False Prophet" of the Apocalypse. That man is Jorge Bergoglio. Stay tuned and you will be convinced soon enough.

Meanwhile the true Pope is Benedict XVI. His "resignation" was only apparent. He remains the true Vicar of Christ. His actions up to now have been guided by the Holy Spirit. A formal schism will come soon, and the authentic Remnant of the Catholic Church will recognize Benedict XVI as the final Pope and Bergoglio as an antipope.

Read the prophecies of St. Malachy, LaSalette, Fatima, Garabandal, etc. Read the original St. Michael prayer of Leo XIII. Read 2 Thessalonians 2, which speaks of an apostasy that must happen right before the Man of Sin (aka the Antichrist) reveals himself. Spoiler alert: the "man of sin" is Bergoglio.

The word "sacrifice" is used 6 times in this document. In each case, it refers either to the historical sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross or to the believer's sacrifice of praise during the "celebration." What is left out is the Catholic Dogma that in the authentic Holy Sacrifice of the Mass we find the same Sacrifice that Christ accomplished on the cross is made truly present in an unbloody manner on the altar. The Mass is not only about producing the Sacrament (the Eucharist) but requires the performance of the perpetual Sacrifice in order to be pleasing to God.

This true Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is primarily for the atonement of the ongoing sins of the world. By the priests performing the Holy Sacrifice, God's wrath is held back. When this perpetual Sacrifice of the Mass ends (Book of Daniel), we will experience "the Day of the Lord." Bergoglio makes it clear in this document that the Novus Ordo is not concerned with performing the perpetual propitiatory Sacrifice. He preaches a "new Gospel."

Instead, the Novus Ordo is only about a Supper (and a re-enactment of "the Paschal Mystery") that all of the baptized (stained by mortal sin or not) should participate, culminating in the taking of Holy Communion. Nowhere does Bergoglio repeat St. Paul's warning (and unchanging Church teaching) about the danger of receiving Communion in a state of mortal sin. As the Novus Ordosong says "All are welcome."

To all of you "Catholics" on the fence, you must decide. Do you want to actually be Catholic or not? If you want to be Catholic and follow Jesus, then attend the traditional Mass exclusively and abide by the consistent, traditional, pre-Vatican II teaching of the Church. If you want to follow Anti-pope Bergoglio into error, then attend the Novus Ordo "celebration" instead. In the process, the Wheat will be separated from the Chaff. But remember that the Wheat is harvested and the Chaff gets burned up.

The word "sacrifice" is used 6 times in this document. In each case, it refers either to the historical sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross or to the believer's sacrifice of praise during the "celebration." What is left out is the Catholic Dogma that in the authentic Holy Sacrifice of the Mass we find the same Sacrifice that Christ accomplished on the cross is made truly present in an unbloody manner on the altar. The Mass is not only about producing the Sacrament (the Eucharist) but requires the performance of the perpetual Sacrifice in order to be pleasing to God.

This true Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is primarily for the atonement of the ongoing sins of the world. By the priests performing the Holy Sacrifice, God's wrath is held back. When this perpetual Sacrifice of the Mass ends (Book of Daniel), we will experience "the Day of the Lord." Bergoglio makes it clear in this document that the Novus Ordo is not concerned with performing the perpetual propitiatory Sacrifice. He preaches a "new Gospel."

Instead, the Novus Ordo is only about a Supper (and a re-enactment of "the Paschal Mystery") that all of the baptized (stained by mortal sin or not) should participate, culminating in the taking of Holy Communion. Nowhere does Bergoglio repeat St. Paul's warning (and unchanging Church teaching) about the danger of receiving Communion in a state of mortal sin. As the Novus Ordo song says "All are welcome."

To all of you "Catholics" on the fence, you must decide. Do you want to actually be Catholic or not? If you want to be Catholic and follow Jesus, then attend the traditional Mass exclusively and abide by the consistent, traditional, pre-Vatican II teaching of the Church. If you want to follow Anti-pope Bergoglio into error, then attend the Novus Ordo "celebration" instead. In the process, the Wheat will be separated from the Chaff. But remember that the Wheat is harvested and the Chaff gets burned up.

@Tony M For more confirmation of "His stamp," look at the message from 18 March 2011 and Google "Iceland eruption 2021." Then look at the message from 22 May 2011 and then Google "Iceland eruption 2011." Two different and very massive eruptions, ten years apart. It would appear that God is hinting that we must add ten years to those prophecies to understand some of them. To me, there seems to be a mixture events that happened back then and events that are happening now. Difficult sometimes to sort out which is which.

Fr. Hesse explains what a proper "consecration of Russia" will look like:

The Conditions of the Consecration of Russia | The Fatima Center

The words "Russia and Ukraine" are mentioned within a "dependent clause." So, grammatically, the words "Russian and Ukraine" refer back to the word "humanity" in the preceding independent clause. Therefore, the "consecration" is of the "humanity" in "especially Russia and Ukraine." Our Lady did not request that "the people of Russia" be consecrated. She requested that "Russia" be consecrated.

Not that any of the above matters, since the consecration must be done by "the Pope." Bergoglio was not canonically-elected because Benedict did not resign the office to begin with.

By praying Bergoglio’s prayer, you are supporting the idea that Our Lady didn’t have the words or instructions right and now Bergoglio (who is definitely not Pope) has finally come up with the correct formula. He is intentionally ignoring her precise request. Choose Mary over Bergoglio. Ignore him instead of ignoring her.

The words "Russia and Ukraine" are mentioned within a "dependent clause." So, grammatically, the words "Russian and Ukraine" refer back to the word "humanity" in the preceding independent clause. Therefore, the "consecration" is of the "humanity" in "especially Russia and Ukraine." Our Lady did not request that "the people of Russia" be consecrated. She requested that "Russia" be consecrated.

Not that any of the above matters, since the consecration must be done by "the Pope." Bergoglio was not canonically-elected because Benedict did not resign the office to begin with.

By praying Bergoglio’s prayer, you are supporting the idea that Our Lady didn’t have the words or instructions right and now Bergoglio (who is definitely not Pope) has finally come up with the correct formula. He is intentionally ignoring her precise request. Choose Mary over Bergoglio. Ignore him instead of ignoring her.

Yes, "communion in the hand" is a sacrilege. In Prummer's Handbook of Moral Theology, a common Pre-Vatican II textbook for priests, here's what it says:

449. 3. REAL SACRILEGE is the use of something sacred for an unworthy purpose. Such sacred things can be reduced to three categories:

I. the Sacraments and the sacramentals, 2. sacred vessels and church decorations, 3. ecclesiastical property.

I. The abuse of the Sacraments is the chief form of real sacrilege, such as the invalid reception of the Sacraments, the commission of grave irreverence towards the Blessed Eucharist, etc.
...

@Adrien. Pfleger's consecration was definitely invalid.

In the video that you cited above, Pfleger says: "the lasting covenant" (instead of "eternal covenant") and "for you and for all people" (instead of "for you and for many"). These are huge differences in the theological meaning of the words.

St. Pius V said the following in his Papal Bull De Defectibus:

"If the priest were to shorten or change the form of the consecration of the Body and the Blood, so that in the change of wording the words did not mean the same thing, he would not be achieving a valid Sacrament."

@thomasvalle Please research the pagan Pachamama ritual that took place under the watchful eye "Pope Francis" on October 4, 2019. Then research the Abu Dhabi Document and the Abrahamic Family House that is being promoted by "Pope Francis."

Then read the Catechism of the Catholic Church that states the following:

"Outside the Church there is no salvation"

846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

After you have done this, tell me how "Pope Francis" is not, at the very least, failing in his mission to warn poor souls who persist in religious error that they will not be saved. Rather than call those "outside the Church" to "enter it and remain in it," by word and example, "Pope Francis" encourages those in error to remain in that error. And remember, that we sin not only by what we "do" but what we "fail to do."

@SonoftheChurch. Why don't you stop telling an esteemed Prelate to be silent? Who do you think you are? Take your own advice. Then, spend some time reading Canon Law, specifically Canon 212, which states the following:

Canon 212

§1. Conscious of their own responsibility, the Christian faithful are bound to follow with Christian obedience those things which the sacred pastors, inasmuch as they represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith or establish as rulers of the Church.

§2. The Christian faithful are free to make known to the pastors of the Church their needs, especially spiritual ones, and their desires.

§3. According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they possess, they have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful, without prejudice to the integrity of faith and morals, with reverence toward their pastors, and attentive to common advantage and the dignity of persons.

I'd say Vigano has more "competence" to challenge Bergoglio than you do to challenge Vigano. Read the words above carefully. Vigano has "the duty" to correct false teaching and scandal. We all have that duty.