And Dear and (my) Good Morning @Scapular

Quite frankly, I have never known how to make of this (mis)leading approach i.e., ‘has this or this happened? No? Therefore ...’

It is insidious.

It is simply whether the Collegial Consecration was done and accepted.

I have presented the documents that HEAVEN prompted me to present. The same HEAVEN could have sent me as a visionary, which means, they thought this as sufficient to answer the objections.

As to my opinion, to me, the context of Our Lady’s Motherly solicitude appears to have been the suffering of her children on earth and in eternity brought upon themselves by their sins. The temporal punishment via the horrors of World Wars.

Combining this with the three World Wars the enemy had planned to use to usher in the Luciferian era, Our Lady thwarted their final War that could have used atheistic Communism. We really have to be grateful to our most merciful mother and the Great and Saintly Pontiff who finally carried out her wish because history tells what what could have befallen the world under communism.

We also have to be grateful that she bought the World some time, the period of peace given the World being from the collapse of the Soviet Union and Russia ceasing to be communist, to circa the beginning of Pope Francis’ pontificate. It is clear we are in the Book of Revelation time. Many will have no excuse.

F M Shananguya if Heaven is using you to promote messages you should present yourself to your Bishop for guidance. This reminds me of the old story where a lady went up to Bishop Fulton Sheen in New York during the second World War and said the Blessed Mother appeared to her and stated that Bishop Sheen should go to Germany to meet with Hitler. Bishop Sheen said "Our Lady appeared to me after she appeared to you and said - 'tell that woman I changed my mind'"

@SHJ-IHM In General, did so to my parish priest when the messages first started way back in 2012.

Most of my messages in my blogs addressed to Hierarchy and Leaders and Laity. And have been sent to them when it was called for.

In this case, there is nothing extraordinary here or new, but pointing to already existing material that the objectors would mention were they balanced and fair.

Your response now makes it clear why HEAVEN chose this way. We would be arguing about the validity of the revelations and whether Church approved.

And again, it was a prompting.

Believe anyone else but the visionary herself and the Pope who made the consecration.

And HEAVEN contradicts itself? Just amended my article by adding it was made by the prompting of HEAVEN. In my case, pointed to already existing documents from people intimately connected with the matter.

*****

EWTN used to have this online (links to it now return 404):

Pope John Paul II and the Collegial Consecration of 1984

There is this paragraph:

“On balance then the most important authorities, including the Pope, the local bishop, prominent theologians, and finally Sr. Lucia herself, hold the view that the 1984 act of consecration of Russia was properly carried out. Perhaps it is not surprising that there is such controversy over this point, given the difficulties the various popes have encountered in attempting to make the collegial consecration.”

Endnote:

The earth is now under a suffocating evil despotism and events [like the period when there was no public Mass even at the Vatican] that point to the fact that we are in the Book of Revelation time. As in the days of Noah, people will be overtaken by these events.

Confusion among the faithful? What could be more confusing than claiming the consecration of the "world" equals the consecration of "Russia"? What happened to Lucia's additional requirement that all the Bishops of the world join in the consecration (of Russia) publicly in their cathedrals? Regarding the letter posted here I don't know if it's a high level fraud, which I think it is, or Lucia got tired of the conga line of consecrations and finally threw in the towel and said "yeah, ok, ok that was accepted".