@j da silva I think that the Imprimatur, Bishop (later Archbishop) William Bernard Ullathorne, O.S.B., of the Diocese of Birmingham, England would be sufficient for any good Catholic as his source of moral credibility for the publication in question.
The word "imprimatur" is Latin for "let it be printed." An imprimatur is a bishop's permission to print a religious book. The 1983 Catholic Code of Canon Law, (Can. 823 §1, Can. 827 §4), requires pastors to help guide the faithful in their use of social communication and particularly books or other writings. The imprimatur is one way that charge is carried out.
Code of Canon Law - Book III - The teaching function of the Church (Cann. 822-833)The current Code of Canon Law explains that “Books or other writings dealing with questions of religion or morals cannot be exhibited, sold, or distributed in churches or oratories unless they have been published with the permission of competent ecclesiastical authority or approved by it subsequently.” A book with an imprimatur has been officially approved by a local bishop or religious superior prior to publication. It is technically not an “endorsement” of a book, but it is a declaration that the book is “free” from theological errors to the best of the authority’s knowledge.
Bearing that in mind, can you provide us with an imprimatur for the article you posted?
Can you provide any proof, whatsoever, that the article which you shared is not an elaborate fabrication authored in part by Luciferian Freemasons or other servants of the prince of this world in order to subvert the credibility of a book which has already received the official approval for publication by the Bishop of the Diocese of Birmingham?