21 Years After 9/11

The events of September 11, 2001 are a key to understand the course of contemporary history. And to pierce the smokescreen presented by the official …
Miles - Christi
About Building 7: Fires do not make skyscrapers fall down, this was controlled demolition, and this alone suffices to tear down the official version, proving without a shadow of a doubt that it was an inside job, and an awfull crime against humanity: 1. 9/11: There were no planes - Part III - Video of WTC 7 Collapse - See also: 1. 9/11 - There was no … - 2. wtc7report.org/…the-Collapse-of-World …More
About Building 7: Fires do not make skyscrapers fall down, this was controlled demolition, and this alone suffices to tear down the official version, proving without a shadow of a doubt that it was an inside job, and an awfull crime against humanity: 1. 9/11: There were no planes - Part III - Video of WTC 7 Collapse - See also: 1. 9/11 - There was no … - 2. wtc7report.org/…the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf - University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11 - 3. 9/11: THERE WERE NO PLANES - PART VIII - ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS COLLAPSES - See … - 4. 9/11: There were no planes - Part VI - Architects and Engineers Solving the Mystery of Building 7 -… - 5. FIRE DID NOT CAUSE BUILDING 7’S COLLAPSE ON 9/11 - Related: 21 Years After 9/11 - On March 25, …
Laura Yunque
I was there that day and lived through the Tower 2 collapse. There were planes. Real, bona fide planes. However, I do not believe the official narrative.
Miles - Christi
But these two videos prove that there was no plane collision, just an explosion coming from inside the building: 9/11: NO HUBO AVIONES - PARTE II - LAS CONSPIRACIONES SIEMPRE EXISTIERON - Video filmado desde … - 11-S: Otro video prueba que no hubo aviones sino una explosión dentro de la torre - Ver también: 1.… - And the building 7 fell in controlled demolition also, and there was no plane …More
But these two videos prove that there was no plane collision, just an explosion coming from inside the building: 9/11: NO HUBO AVIONES - PARTE II - LAS CONSPIRACIONES SIEMPRE EXISTIERON - Video filmado desde … - 11-S: Otro video prueba que no hubo aviones sino una explosión dentro de la torre - Ver también: 1.… - And the building 7 fell in controlled demolition also, and there was no plane collision neither: 9/11: There were no planes - Part III - Video of WTC 7 Collapse - See also: 1. 9/11 - There was no … - And in the Pentagon there was no plane wreckage, not even the colossal engines that could never have vanished...
Laura Yunque
After the first plane hit, one of my coworkers came running through the office screaming his head off because he saw another plane coming, a low flying plane coming....we all saw it fly right into the building.
Miles - Christi - English
It must have been an holographic projection. The images of the impact of the second plane broadcast by CNN show that at the moment of impact the plane vanishes on contact with the building, instead of ricocheting and shattering before a steel structure that could never have been penetrated by an aircraft which is made of a light metal... AGDmovie Original: THE ANATOMY OF A GREAT DECEPTION - Full …More
It must have been an holographic projection. The images of the impact of the second plane broadcast by CNN show that at the moment of impact the plane vanishes on contact with the building, instead of ricocheting and shattering before a steel structure that could never have been penetrated by an aircraft which is made of a light metal... AGDmovie Original: THE ANATOMY OF A GREAT DECEPTION - Full Movie by DAVID HOOPER - OUR THOUGHTS ON THE EVENTS OF 9/11 - BRO. MICHAEL DIMOND AND BRO. PETER DIMOND (2007)
Laura Yunque
If it was, it was quite remarkable as we heard the plane's engine and felt the vibration of the plane as it flew by. I have no doubt there was controlled demolition in the towers, etc. Let's not forget Building 7. However, I know what I saw and heard and felt that day. If I find out one day, probably at the Last Judgement (then we will be told the truth about everything), that it was a hologram, so …More
If it was, it was quite remarkable as we heard the plane's engine and felt the vibration of the plane as it flew by. I have no doubt there was controlled demolition in the towers, etc. Let's not forget Building 7. However, I know what I saw and heard and felt that day. If I find out one day, probably at the Last Judgement (then we will be told the truth about everything), that it was a hologram, so be it. I want to know the truth. However, this video does not provide the evidence it purports to.
Miles - Christi - English
One day we will know what happened in its smallest details, without a shadow of a doubt...
Dante Alighieri
I am a going to take the bait and enter into this discussion, for one comment only. I've seen my share of documentaries and read my share of analyses, like the next person. I was at ground zero shortly after the attacks and used to regularly take the PATH train to NYC to the World Trade Center. I do not have anybody's resume to check their credentials, but lots of people with degrees have spoken …More
I am a going to take the bait and enter into this discussion, for one comment only. I've seen my share of documentaries and read my share of analyses, like the next person. I was at ground zero shortly after the attacks and used to regularly take the PATH train to NYC to the World Trade Center. I do not have anybody's resume to check their credentials, but lots of people with degrees have spoken about this. But the most convincing arguments to me are the following. (Some) engineers have said the heat could not melt steel. However, this was not a fire started by putting a cigarette out in a waste paper basket. It was a jet just took off from an airport with I do not know how many thousands of gallons of jet fuel which ignited and exploded upon impact. It was a major MISSILE aimed directly at a building (x2), a big one, but thin in proportion to its height. I just read today a skeptical article mentioning sprinkler systems against fires, my eyes just glossed over on this, sprinklers were part of the (engineers!!!!) report. That should have put out the fires. Yeah, that was gonna help. Multiple floors were disintegrated by the impact and people were stranded above that point. And then the fires from thousands of gallons of jet fuel which exploded--we saw it, didn't we? Oh, I forgot, some are now arguing (and I saw the video, it was amazing!) that CGI made us THINK that planes hit the building, but it was a computer illusion we are seeing, but didn't the pedestrians on the street ALL SEE, after they HEARD the planes, smack into the buildings? They looked up, they heard and saw a jet not where it was supposed to be flying going really really fast. OK, so why was there a conspiracy to blow up the buildings? Bush did it? Why? Because he wanted to go to war? And who cooperated with him? Guilani? Guilani blew up the buildings for Bush? Maybe, but why did he not move the NYC emergency command center, which was located AT the WTC, until AFTER they were hit? I remember this vividly. I remember when they said, We gotta go! Now! He must have known what was coming? OK, so they did it behind the mayor's back. Silverstein? They guy who owned the buildings, blew them up, for Bush? Nobody saw the work being done? And they still had to have the cooperation of the suicidal hijackers too? No? They are illusory too? All 11 or 12 of them. And what about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind, the one that got his Biden-deal today, is he for real? What exactly was the motive and who is responsible? Bin Laden working WITH Bush? But such good friends, Bin Laden never spilled the beans and ratted out Bush. All I hear is fire cannot melt steel at those alleged temperatures, alleged because they were obviously hotter than (some) engineers say they were.
Miles - Christi
Look at the videos that I put in the main article (20 Years After 9/11) , you will see that there was no plane, the official images are digitally made, and the collapse of the three buildings, controlled demolition...
Miles - Christi
"but didn't the pedestrians on the street ALL SEE, after they HEARD the planes, smack into the buildings?" - NO, WATCH THIS: 9/11: WITNESSES SAY THERE WERE NO AIRPLANES - With Spanish Subtitles - See also: 20 Years After 9/…
Dante Alighieri
@Chat Chartreux And why exactly did they destroy Bldg 7? Why that one in addition to the two towers? I do not know why. Why not 3,4,5,6? And the hotel? Maybe not big enough? But then why bother with 7? I am supposing that the debris came down on top of it. What really is the significance of taking down 7? What was in it? Why take a chance of being discovered wiring that building for demolition when …More
@Chat Chartreux And why exactly did they destroy Bldg 7? Why that one in addition to the two towers? I do not know why. Why not 3,4,5,6? And the hotel? Maybe not big enough? But then why bother with 7? I am supposing that the debris came down on top of it. What really is the significance of taking down 7? What was in it? Why take a chance of being discovered wiring that building for demolition when it was absolutely mind-boggling unimportant to do so. Even now (even me) we all forgot about that building. Why bother with it? That is a distraction to the twin towers. If they did BURN down, then 7 crumbled down or burned down too from the spillage.
Dante Alighieri
@Miles - Christi Listen to the reporter talk about the two planes and the guy saying there was no second plane (he admits to the first?). There were multiple witnesses to the planes. Where did the reporter get this? I worked with somebody who saw one of the planes. Many were already outside watching, the second plane was even live on TV! Don't even go there. It is absolutely insane. We can still …More
@Miles - Christi Listen to the reporter talk about the two planes and the guy saying there was no second plane (he admits to the first?). There were multiple witnesses to the planes. Where did the reporter get this? I worked with somebody who saw one of the planes. Many were already outside watching, the second plane was even live on TV! Don't even go there. It is absolutely insane. We can still see them on film. This is why I said I would only give one comment. It is like a bizarro world.
Miles - Christi - English
I have never seen footage of the supposed first plane, only the second. And these two home videos prove that there was no collision of any kind, just an explosion inside the building: 9/11: NO HUBO AVIONES - PARTE II - LAS CONSPIRACIONES SIEMPRE EXISTIERON - Video filmado desde … - 11-S: Otro video prueba que no hubo aviones sino una explosión dentro de la torre - Ver también: 1.…
Rafał_Ovile
Miles - Christi - English Although not of highest rank the provided scientific evidence is trustworthy on account of possible pre-planned demolition of building seven and other. However how should one dismiss evidence on hijacking Flight 11 with onboard passengers missing to support the claim of virtual hologram planes hitting the buildings? Flight 11 didn't occur or what?
Miles - Christi
Much detail of this criminal farce remains to be clarified. To this day, everything leads me to believe that there were no planes and that the "official" videos present a hologram. And it has its logic: the attacks had to happen, as well as the three controlled demolitions, perfectly prepared since months probably, and they could not depend on something as random as the succes of a crazy attempt of …More
Much detail of this criminal farce remains to be clarified. To this day, everything leads me to believe that there were no planes and that the "official" videos present a hologram. And it has its logic: the attacks had to happen, as well as the three controlled demolitions, perfectly prepared since months probably, and they could not depend on something as random as the succes of a crazy attempt of some bearded muslims armed with cutters who barely knew how to fly a small plane. For example, there are expert pilots who say that it is not possible to descend a boeing to crash against the Pentagon below the ground for a novice, and extremely difficult for a seasoned professional. In any case, assuming that the two main towers have been hit by planes, the undeniable thing remains that neither Building 7 nor the Pentagon were. And that the twin towers would never have collapsed at a dizzying and uniform speed. According to many engineers, they should not even have collapsed at all, the structure being so solid that a plane crash would have caused minor damage to it. The problem here is analogous to that of the "plandemic" and the "covid vaccines": there are plenty of elements to know for sure that the official story is a huge and criminal hoax, but, on this side of the stage, it is very difficult for us to unravel all the ins and outs of the diabolical imposture...
Rafał_Ovile
Miles - Christi would you exclude possibility of trained islamic terrorists and explosives being engaged by the same suspect of 9/11 crime ?
To reiterate my point both plane crashes and demolitions could have been executed simultaneously. If you dig deeper into facts then dismissing existence of such captain as John Ogonowski on board flight 11, without support of logical argumentation, contradicts …More
Miles - Christi would you exclude possibility of trained islamic terrorists and explosives being engaged by the same suspect of 9/11 crime ?
To reiterate my point both plane crashes and demolitions could have been executed simultaneously. If you dig deeper into facts then dismissing existence of such captain as John Ogonowski on board flight 11, without support of logical argumentation, contradicts the scientific method. Don't you agree?
Miles - Christi - English
No, of course, I do not exclude the participation of Islamic terrorists, recruited and trained by the CIA. But there are several amateur films of the alleged second impact against the twin towers that seem to show that there was nothing but an internal explosion. From which it could be inferred that the official videos in which an airplane is seen would be digital confections, or else the filming …More
No, of course, I do not exclude the participation of Islamic terrorists, recruited and trained by the CIA. But there are several amateur films of the alleged second impact against the twin towers that seem to show that there was nothing but an internal explosion. From which it could be inferred that the official videos in which an airplane is seen would be digital confections, or else the filming of a holographic projection. I reiterate what I said in my previous comment: there are many decisive indications concerning the misleading nature of the official version, but for us, mere spectators on the other side of the stage, it is impossible, at least until now, to unravel all the details of this gigantic mental manipulation maneuver and criminal work of social engineering that are these supposed "Islamic attacks" of 9/11...
mccallansteve
That was a key part of the great reset. The three thousand lives lost means nothing to the elite. They also applaud the deaths of 6o million innocent children in the womb in America alone.
Miles - Christi
These people lack any moral scruples. They are psychopaths and act under the guidance of Satan. Nor did they care about the hundreds of thousands of dead and disabled caused by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, under the pretext of the "war on terror." They are the true terrorists. Just as they are not affected at all by the countless victims of the plandemic, the lockdowns and the criminal covid …More
These people lack any moral scruples. They are psychopaths and act under the guidance of Satan. Nor did they care about the hundreds of thousands of dead and disabled caused by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, under the pretext of the "war on terror." They are the true terrorists. Just as they are not affected at all by the countless victims of the plandemic, the lockdowns and the criminal covid vaccines...
Steve Thomas
I'm a structural engineer and people had better wake up to the fact that this evil was an inside job via controlled demolition -- Engineering is the only exact science on the planet and we know what we are talking about!
Miles - Christi
Of course. The evidence is multiple and irrefutable. Just seeing what happened to building 7 is more than enough to understand it... 9/11: There were no planes - Part III - Video of WTC 7 Collapse - See also: 1. 9/11 - There was no …