Confused Vatican: “We Baptize You” Was "Valid" In 2003 And Invalid In 2020

Who the heck is I.
Jesus said: "I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. Jesus makes a clear distinction between Him and the reader. Therefore use pluralis majestatis. Include the king of kings. If not you are alone and without Jesus you can do nothing. Well that is a clear definition of: What you do without me is void. Or a definition of --baptism using "I" is nothing.

Briefly - 'Ecclesia supplet ' applies only to jurisdictional matters lacking and not sacramental defects.
From the learned Father.

8. Of the seven sacraments, two were instituted In specie. In
specie in this context means that Christ gave us the form, i.e. what to
say, as well as the matter, i.e. the material things to be used. The two
instituted In specie are Baptism and Holy
Eucharist. Change the meaning, and therefore the signification, of either
of those two, and you wreck the sacrament.

9. St Thomas has, in this connection, the following cautionary
word:

'The other point to be considered is the meaning of the words. For since in the sacraments, the words produce an effect according to the sense which they convey, as stated above, we must see whether the change of words destroys the essential sense of the words: because then the sacrament is clearly rendered invalid.' (Summa Th. III, Q.60, Art.8).
Fr Meuli's argument lays waste to the general concept that the "short form" of consecration is sufficient to confect the Sacrament.http://promultis.blogspot.com/2006...