"You miss the forest again for the trees."This isn't a forestry class, Thor. This is you falsifying history for your own ends.
"My point is the attack by antipope Francis on the concept of contemplative prayer as a vocation in itself."A "point" you were reduced to supporting by inventing a blatantly false claim about how the last words of an English king were
"always interpreted as.".They
weren't "always interpreted" that way
at all. In fact, the very historian who serves as the primary source of this attribution to the king interpreted them entirely differently. Further, the historian's description of the king's behavior directly contradicts
your interpretation.
King Henry VIII wasn't praying and that isn't how his last words were
"always interpreted as".The
point is you routinely fabricate claims of support for your own interpretations where none exists.
This is a recurring theme with
all your claims on GTV, regardless of the subject.
The
point is you're a habitual liar, maybe even a pathological one.
"But you are fine with such anti catholic agendas since you continue to accept a proven public formal heretic as the Vicar of Christ."Case in point: I have no
"anti-catholic agenda". This is you telling another lie. Again.
It's a particularly ugly lie since you're telling it with the intent to defame my reputation and vilify my character to other Catholic readers.
Unlike you, I'm consistent in applying Canon Law and Church Magesterium uniformly to
all Popes.
You don't.
It's funny to watch you tack on your usual qualifications to bolster your claim. A "proven" heretic? By whom?
You?
I can readily find at least one staunchly Catholic traditionalist Cardinal, highly esteemed here on GTV, who claims just the opposite.
novusordowatch.org/…/burke-francis-n…...and suppose Francis is, which is possible, something I've never disputed.
If he is, then you have a problem. The
Church has a problem.
Others have also "proven" the last four Popes are formal heretics as well. There are a number of "proven" heresies in Benedict XVI's writings going all the way back to when he was Cardinal Ratzinger.
You resort to every fast-talking demagogue's trick to avoid answering and disproving that long, long list of "proven" heresies against Francis' predecessors..
You know the ones. The ones you recoil from. The ones you demand I re-write hoping to find some new "point" to attack because you
can't disprove them the way they're
already presented
right now.
Those heresies.
"Clearly the Christ you believe in must also be a deceiver"The only demonstrable "deceiver" on this comments thread is
you.
Next time you tell a lie on GTV, pick a better subject. History, particularly English history, has little if any room for your fabrications..