Sally Dorman
8477

Bishop Andrew Cozzens' statement re: Fiducia Supplicans

December 18, 2023-Today the Vatican issued a statement, signed by the Holy Father, that spoke about offering blessings to people who currently live outside of the way of life commanded by Jesus. The document especially addresses the question of blessing "same-sex couples." The document from the Vatican, Fiducia Supplicans (FS), is clear that this is not in any way a change in the Church's teaching about marriage. The Church's teaching about marriage, since it is rooted in the Gospel we have received from Jesus Christ, is unchangeable. The Vatican document itself states that marriage is an "exclusive, stable, and indissoluble union between a man and a woman, naturally open to the generation of children" and the document also states that "this conviction is grounded in the perennial Catholic doctrine of marriage, it is only in this context that sexual relations find their natural, proper, and fully human meaning. The Church's doctrine on this point remains firm" (FS, 4).

What is the Vatican saying then? We know that Jesus Christ came to call all peoples to repentance and conversion because he desires that we would share with him the fullness of divine life in his kingdom. All of us are sinners and all of us are at different stages in this path of conversion. We see in the Gospels that whenever anyone comes to Jesus with a heart open to him, a heart seeking his mercy, Jesus always responds with mercy and inviting them to deeper repentance and discipleship. There are many examples of this in the Gospels, for example, the woman caught in adultery. Jesus receives her with mercy, saves her from the penalty of death, yet without condoning her sinful activity. He shows her love and mercy and calls her to a new life when he says, "Neither do I condemn you. Go, [and] from now on do not sin any more" (John 8:11). Jesus does this for all of us.

Today's document emphasizes that people who come to the Church for a blessing, "acknowledge that the life of the Church springs from the womb of God's mercy and helps us to move forward, to live better, and to respond to the Lord's will" (FS, 20). Although it is impossible for us to bless a same-sex union, since any sexual-union outside of the marriage of one man and one woman is contrary to the Gospel, we may bless individuals who are not yet living in full accord with the Gospel, even those in a same-sex union. This is not a marriage blessing and should never be done in a liturgical or ceremonial way which would give the false idea of blessing a union contrary to the Gospel. It is not legitimate to use the Book of Blessings or any official ritual for blessing a union contrary to God's law. This is a blessing for persons who "recognizing themselves to be destitute and in need of his help do not claim a legitimation of their own status, but who beg that all that is true, good, and humanly valid in their lives and their relationships be enriched, healed, and elevated by the presence of the Holy Spirit" (FS, 31).

This blessing is not for people seeking a legitimation of same sex union but for those seeking to live better: "there is no intention to legitimize anything, but rather to open one's life to God, to ask for his help to live better, and also to invoke the Holy Spirit so that the values of the Gospel may be lived with greater faithfulness" (FS 40).

The truth is we are all sinners and all of us need God's blessing to come to repentance and conversion. Often at Holy Mass we tell people who are not able to receive Holy Communion because they are living in a situation that is objectively outside of Jesus commandments that they should come for a blessing. This reception of the blessing expresses a humble desire to grow in conversion, to seek his help to overcome sin, to seek holiness which is the goal of every Christian life.
SonoftheChurch
Sorry, Your Excellency. You can add all the sugar and cream you like to this cup….but it’s STILL a cup of steaming, stinking excrement. Drink it at your own peril.
petrus100452
I met Bishop Cozzens personally when he had to wait a day in Amsterdam for a flight to America. He was staying with me at the time. He had just given a retreat to the Missionaries of Charity (Sisters of Mother Teresa) with whom he maintains a good relationship. Bishop Cozzens is - in my opinion - a pious man trying to be a sincere follower of Christ. When he stayed with me - I think in 2016, just …More
I met Bishop Cozzens personally when he had to wait a day in Amsterdam for a flight to America. He was staying with me at the time. He had just given a retreat to the Missionaries of Charity (Sisters of Mother Teresa) with whom he maintains a good relationship. Bishop Cozzens is - in my opinion - a pious man trying to be a sincere follower of Christ. When he stayed with me - I think in 2016, just after the publication of Amoris Leatitia - I spoke with him about this encyclical. He shifted color when I told him I felt betrayed by Pope Francis, and he did not respond. The problem with him, and many bishops who are like him, is that deep in their hearts they see the truth, but they dare not acknowledge it because the consequences are too terrible. They are blinded by a certain form of papolatry that forbids them from ever thinking of the pope as erring or spreading heresy. Even though this is so obvious. Then they prefer to do - as in Bishop Cozzens' commentary - all kinds of brain gymnastics to defend the indefensible, to talk the lie straight. In fact, these are the greatest victims of Francis' deceptions. Their piety makes them, for the sake of their "obedience" to the pope, deny the truth to themselves.
V.R.S.
As far as I remember people in "same-sex couples" i.e. public sodomites used to be excommunicated by the Church, cf. Councils of Elvira (305/306), Ancyra (314), Third Lateran Ecumenical Council (1179) - canon XI:
Quicumque autem in incontinentia illa, quae contra naturam est, propter quam ira Dei venit in filios diffidentiae et quinque civitates igne consumpsit, deprehensi fuerint laborare, si …More
As far as I remember people in "same-sex couples" i.e. public sodomites used to be excommunicated by the Church, cf. Councils of Elvira (305/306), Ancyra (314), Third Lateran Ecumenical Council (1179) - canon XI:

Quicumque autem in incontinentia illa, quae contra naturam est, propter quam ira Dei venit in filios diffidentiae et quinque civitates igne consumpsit, deprehensi fuerint laborare, si clerici fuerint, eiciantur a clero et ad agendam poenitentiam in monasteriis retrudantur; si laici, excommunicationi subdantur et a coetu fidelium fiant penitus alieni.

But whoever is in that incontinence, which is contrary to nature, because of which the wrath of God came upon the sons of unbelief and consumed five cities with fire, they must be caught working, if they were clerics, they should be expelled from the clergy and sent back to do penance in monasteries. if they are laymen, they are subject to excommunication and become completely alienated from the group of the faithful.

Why His Excellency is not able to say: Yes, yes - no, no but engages in a not-subtle-at-all but rather grotesque trap of blessings that are not blessings and acceptance of couples contra naturam that gives no acceptance.
Denis Efimov
Who are they trying to fool? In the eyes of the whole world, this means only one thing: Francis allowed the marriages of sodomites to be blessed. And in practice, these rituals will look (and already look) equivalent to marriage
V.R.S.
"Francis allowed the marriages of sodomites to be blessed..."
---
But only "spontaneously".
V.R.S.
"But" is a favorite modernist word e.g.:
Credo in unum Deum but let us enjoy the "values" of pagan Hinduism (Nostra Aetate). And so on.
Denis Efimov
This is true
SHJ-IHM
Yeah thanks Bishop Cozzens. Be careful not to rock the boat (pun intended). I'm sure your clarification will result in retractions of the recent headlines all over the world. And I'm sure we won't see same-sex marriages coming soon to a parish near you.