NASA: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus NASA fabricated the earth/moon pictures from space supposedly taken during the 1969 Apollo 11 mission and in 2015 by DSCOVR.More
NASA fabricated the earth/moon pictures from space supposedly taken during the 1969 Apollo 11 mission and in 2015 by DSCOVR.
thewarourtimebitsandpieces.blog
NASA: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
NASA: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus NASA has presented the following two pictures as both being true: Conclusion Clearly, these two pictures cannot both be true …
Ok. Telemetric lenses work with the principle of orthographic projection. Do you agree because the sizes are preserved relatively? A question will follow after you answer...
in the limit of the focal-length goes to infinity, (telemetric) then the projection will go to orthographic. That is correct. Therefore the NASA picture is what it is. It is all correct. Trust me I am an engineer. But I fear at NASA's they are engineers as well.
"if the limit of the focal-length goes to infinity, then the projection will go to orthographic." So you are now trying to say that it is a combination of perspective and orthographic?
It means that if you use a lens with a big focal length, then your projection is automatically always near orthographic. Now the other NASA picture is taken with a lens with a focal length of say 20mm. Then you get what you see in that particular picture.
Image 1- is taken with a telemetric lens with big focal length and thus perspective = near orthometric. image 2- is taken with a lens with a small focal length and thus real perspective.
"Image 2- is taken with a telemetric lens with big focal length and thus perspective = near orthometric. image 1- is taken with a lens with a small focal length and thus real perspective." Then permit me to take the ratio of image2.
If it wasn’t a careless fabrication. If 1 is true 2 can’t be and vice-a-versa. Since both are presented as true, they are both fabricated. Additionally, I assert that 1 on its own is a fabrication. Further, I do believe the circumference of the moon can also be estimated in 1 ... draw the conclusions.
@Pattfm If earth be an NBA standard basketball 9.47 in dia, the moon will be an official ITF tennis ball 2.635 in dia, and the distance between them 24 ft. Any chance to model in blender view of basketball from tennis ball and vice-versa?
If I do, they (NASA supporters) will bring the concept of telecentric cameras which you already disproved by those images you posted (about them saying that image2 is actually how the human eyes would see it).
Not even pseudoscience, Masonic science I might add. For those knowledgeable with the society of the impious numerology, the first image in my post taken July 21, 1969 = 7/21/1969 = 9/11 666. Second picture July 16, 2015 = 7/16/2015 = 22 or 11 11. Bonus: Earth mean orbit velocity, 66,622 mph = 666 22. These figures are arbitrary, just chosen for their numerology significance.More
Not even pseudoscience, Masonic science I might add. For those knowledgeable with the society of the impious numerology, the first image in my post taken July 21, 1969 = 7/21/1969 = 9/11 666. Second picture July 16, 2015 = 7/16/2015 = 22 or 11 11.
Bonus: Earth mean orbit velocity, 66,622 mph = 666 22. These figures are arbitrary, just chosen for their numerology significance.
There is no conflict. The first photo was taken a few dozen miles above the surface of the moon, so the moon looks huge and the earth looks a quarter million miles away, because it is. The second photo is taken a million miles away from either the earth or the moon, it doesn't say, but at that distance the moon appears much closer to its actual relative size with respect to the earth, about 1/4 the …More
There is no conflict. The first photo was taken a few dozen miles above the surface of the moon, so the moon looks huge and the earth looks a quarter million miles away, because it is. The second photo is taken a million miles away from either the earth or the moon, it doesn't say, but at that distance the moon appears much closer to its actual relative size with respect to the earth, about 1/4 the earth's diameter. If you see a full moon and hold your thumb up to cover it, do you conclude that your thumb is bigger than the moon?
We have a free 3d software for simulation www.blender.org Get the presupposed size of the earth, the moon, and their distance apart. Scale down the values above to be within the field of view of the simulator. Make sure you are using perspective projection. Look from the moon... Can you see anything? Look from behind the moon "a million miles away" (with the same ratio of reduction).…More
We have a free 3d software for simulation www.blender.org Get the presupposed size of the earth, the moon, and their distance apart. Scale down the values above to be within the field of view of the simulator. Make sure you are using perspective projection. Look from the moon... Can you see anything? Look from behind the moon "a million miles away" (with the same ratio of reduction)... Can you see anything?
One more comment from mystic
One more comment from F M Shyanguya
One more comment from Pattfm
Get the presupposed size of the earth, the moon, and their distance apart.