"it's not a fake photo." @JamesMichaelYerianMore of Jimmy's Big Mouth, boldly claimed and unsupported.
Protip:
I only just pointed out where the signature got "fudged" in the photo. ."I wouldn't know how."Sure, Jimmy. You're one of the few people stupid enough to claim incompetence as a defense for an incompetently photo-shopped photo.
;-)"And sorry, the pope is not in error, since he promotes those beliefs. He is a heretic."According to Canon Law? No. These are more "Jimmies". Artificially Flavored and scattered all over your posts.
Time to sweep 'em up with some Copy Pasta.
Heresy and error are two different things. A Pope may err, everything a Pope states is not automatically infallible. Heresy, as the Church defines it in Canon Law 751, is "an obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; "
Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."
In this context, the term shows that
a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.
Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) has happened.
b.)-d.) have not.
You aren't qualified to represent The Church in doing b.-d., not in law or in fact. Neither is some blogger.
Your opinion that the Pope doubts or denies a truth taught by the Church to be divine is not an objective fact. Likewise, your opinion that his supposed doubt or denial is maintained in an obstinate manner is also an opinion. You haven't shown The Church has attempted to correct it and failed. So your claim has no support.
A more relevant question in light of a charge of heresy is this: who has the temporal authority to represent the Church when attempting to correct the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?