James Manning
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@V.R.S. - I read the title and realized that the document would more or less be garbage. I still read it over a few times to understand exactly why it's garbage because I knew other people would latch on to the "good stuff" and ignore all the problems. "But it condemns transgenderism", "Yes, but not for the right reasons, and that's going to be a problem down the road."
My wife was one of those …More
@V.R.S. - I read the title and realized that the document would more or less be garbage. I still read it over a few times to understand exactly why it's garbage because I knew other people would latch on to the "good stuff" and ignore all the problems. "But it condemns transgenderism", "Yes, but not for the right reasons, and that's going to be a problem down the road."
My wife was one of those people. She doesn't have any training in philosophy, so I walked her through the foundational problems of the text. She gets it now.
My wife was one of those people. She doesn't have any training in philosophy, so I walked her through the foundational problems of the text. She gets it now.
Now, being 100 % serious: the document is heretical and blasphemous in its very first line (Dignitas infinita...) attributing to man what is God's. What is the purpose of reading and analyzing the rest (instead of putting it where it belongs i.e. to the trash can)?
Ivan Tomas
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Put it on the Index and burn all the hard copies outside on the Vatican square!