I think a clear distinction needs to be made between "actual sex abuse of minors" and "gay sex between adult priests and seminarians."
I don't intend to excuse the sin of sodomy. Personally, I think we should apply St. Pius V's opinion from Horrendum Ilud Scelus.
I do intend to assert that in the overwhelming majority of "abuse" cases between adult clerics and seminarians there are no victims. It's almost always effeminate men having gay sex with other effeminate men who have both found refuge in an effeminate modern Church.
The article states that one accuser is now laicized and a publicly practicing homosexual. The main accuser claims to have been "abused" over and over. How on earth does an average sized priest actually rape another adult man even once? Let alone repeatedly?