Francis says that the protests following the killing of George Floyd had the spirit of the Good Samaritan. “This movement did not pass by on the other side of the road when it saw the injury to human …More
Francis says that the protests following the killing of George Floyd had the spirit of the Good Samaritan. “This movement did not pass by on the other side of the road when it saw the injury to human dignity caused by an abuse of power.”
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Protip to Pope Francis. According to Christ's parable, the Good Samaritan didn't riot, loot, burn buildings, or kill police officers and Caucasians.
Facts Not Lies
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
BLM (Not the original Bureau of land management... but the imposter) is designed to accentuate and fortify the barriers between race under the false flag of its inverse.
By highlighting race in activities they ensure polarity while claiming to be eliminating it.
Imagine this headline:
"Citizen takes steps to protect property during a riot. In doing so, he limited shop access to those who are viewed …More
BLM (Not the original Bureau of land management... but the imposter) is designed to accentuate and fortify the barriers between race under the false flag of its inverse.
By highlighting race in activities they ensure polarity while claiming to be eliminating it.
Imagine this headline:
"Citizen takes steps to protect property during a riot. In doing so, he limited shop access to those who are viewed as retaining civil behavior"
Now we rewrite this to start racism:
"White owner of high end shop refuses access to community members who cannot remain considerate in the shop"
Next step as the above will not ignite prejudice as strongly:
"White owner of high end shop seen chasing off customers of color".
The first headline is correct, succinct, and contains no fallacious addition of racial polarizing terms. The second adds the first polarizer. The last paints a nice equator between the poles.
Of course, the shop owner had chased off misbehaving persons regardless of color (you know a behaviorally motivated decision) ... The misbehavior is incited for their dismissal. This information was omitted as blurs the racially polarizing narrative so... it is removed to "save space" (on the web?).
By highlighting race in activities they ensure polarity while claiming to be eliminating it.
Imagine this headline:
"Citizen takes steps to protect property during a riot. In doing so, he limited shop access to those who are viewed as retaining civil behavior"
Now we rewrite this to start racism:
"White owner of high end shop refuses access to community members who cannot remain considerate in the shop"
Next step as the above will not ignite prejudice as strongly:
"White owner of high end shop seen chasing off customers of color".
The first headline is correct, succinct, and contains no fallacious addition of racial polarizing terms. The second adds the first polarizer. The last paints a nice equator between the poles.
Of course, the shop owner had chased off misbehaving persons regardless of color (you know a behaviorally motivated decision) ... The misbehavior is incited for their dismissal. This information was omitted as blurs the racially polarizing narrative so... it is removed to "save space" (on the web?).
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I think Barabbas and the Zealots would be a much more apt analogy than the Good Samaritan. Jorge Soros would disagree, I guess.