In qualunque stato di diritto, Austria, Italia o Francia, non si è mai visto un Procuratore della Repubblica fare sceneggiate in aula perchè viene presentata una istanza di ricusazione.
Anzi, nei Paesi civili il magistrato che è consapevole che questo possa accadere si astiene lui stesso.
Come mai Alessandro Diddi, Promotore di Giustizia dello Stato della Città del Vaticano, addirittura dice agli avvocati: "Grazie per aver presentato questa istanza" e poi, prendendola chiaramente sul personale, si lancia in invettive ed elucubrazioni?
Forse qualcuno non ha ben capito qual è il ruolo del Promotore di Giustizia in questo Stato.
Testo e foto da pagina facebook di SilereNonPossum
"In any rule-of-law state—Austria, Italy, or France—one has never seen a Public Prosecutor put on a show in court simply because a motion for recusal has been filed.
On the contrary, in civilized countries, a magistrate who is aware that such a situation may arise will recuse himself voluntarily.
So why does Alessandro Diddi, Promoter of Justice of the Vatican City State, even go so far as to tell the lawyers: “Thank you for having filed this motion”—and then, clearly taking it personally, launch into invectives and rambling speculations?
Perhaps someone has not quite understood what the actual role of the Promoter of Justice is in this State."
In any rule-of-law state—Austria, Italy, or France—one has never seen a Public Prosecutor put on a show in court simply because a motion for recusal has been filed.
On the contrary, in civilized countries, a magistrate who is aware that such a situation may arise will recuse himself voluntarily.
So why does Alessandro Diddi, Promoter of Justice of the Vatican City State, even go so far as to tell the lawyers: “Thank you for having filed this motion”—and then, clearly taking it personally, launch into invectives and rambling speculations?
Perhaps someone has not quite understood what the actual role of the Promoter of Justice is in this State.