The COVID vaccines were designed to fail
In this 10-minute video, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi discusses the fundamental reason for the current wave of “breakthrough infections:” the failure of the COVID vaccines had to be expected, because fundamental principles of immunology were ignored in their design.
The first mistake was to focus on antibodies rather than cellular immunity (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes) in assessing vaccine efficacy, even though cellular immunity is far more important to antiviral immunity than are antibodies.
The second mistake was to neglect the functional distinction between the two major categories of antibodies, which the body produces in order to protect itself from pathogenic microbes:
1. The first category (secretory IgA) is produced by immune cells (lymphocytes) that are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract. The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are ejected through and to the surface of the linings. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.
2. The second category of antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.
Does this insight not have major implications for flu and pneumonia jabs as well? If the systems of defence are independent then the respiratory and gastrointestinal surfaces will still be vulnerable after the jabs.
Physics cannot be changed by any antivirus.
a) When a carrier expresses respiratory fluids (spit, phlegm, ...) in an aerosol form, this can remain in the air for many hours depending on airflow and such.
b) When a person inhales this fluid, there is a small chance they will inhale the virus.
c) When a person who inhales the virus, there is an even smaller chance they may 'catch' the cold.
d) When a person 'catches' the cold (yes COVID 19 too) there is nearly no chance they will have adverse effects ("Mild Symptoms"). - These are the asymptomatic people.
e) When a person gets adverse effects, they will most likely have minor symptoms for a few weeks (you know... like a cold aka Corona virus). These are the 'cases' (if reported).
f) If a person who presents very adverse symptoms from a corona virus there is a small they will need extensive care unless they have pre-existing conditions which are exacerbated by the cold. These are those with cardio, respiratory, ... and other conditions who are already battling something else.
g) If a person does need extensive care, it is nearly 99% chance it is because of the pre-existing conditions.
h) If these pre-existing conditions are fatal, then they can pass away. Yep, we sadly lost a loved one to pneumonia or another condition which was already creeping up on them before they caught a corona virus.
All that to show:
- Only way to stop infection from respiratory infection from an airborne virus is to prevent breathing air from a previously passing person or until it is 'disinfected' - really
- Of all those who start at 'a', only 0.03% reach 'h'
- Of those who reach 'h', most are already highly sensitive prior to catching the corona virus.
I expect some black suited (jack booted) thugs at my door now.
In diesem englischen Video erklärt Bhakdi, warum der "Impfstoff" gar nicht vor Ansteckung schützen kann. Und er bittet Augenärzte, nach sichtbaren Thrombosen in der Netzhaut der Geimpften zu suchen.