3
4
1
2
On the supposed invalidity of the Novus Ordo of episcopale consecrations due to its Spirit Christology. We have dealt in the past with six different reasons for which this new rite must be invalid. Of …More
On the supposed invalidity of the Novus Ordo of episcopale consecrations due to its Spirit Christology.

We have dealt in the past with six different reasons for which this new rite must be invalid. Of these, not a single one has been disproved to our satisfaction. In this relatively short booklet we are almost exclusively concerned with the question of how invalidity is related to the “spiritus principalis”. In fact, we are encountering a seventh reason for invalidity: the “conciliar sect” makes no distinction between the formal cause of the high-priesthood in Christ Himself and the formal cause of the consecration of the apostles. It may astonish traditional Catholics to hear that the difference is an infinite one. It is the difference between the infinite and non-created existence of God who became Man on the one hand, an existence which is that of the Eternal Word Incarnate; and, on the other hand, the finite, created power of the priestly character, which confers only a limited participation in the priesthood of the Redeemer.
The above-mentioned fact is denied by the new form of consecration, which puts something else in its place. It sees the formal cause of the priestly ordination of the Redeemer on one hand, and that of the apostles and their successors on the other , in one and the same thing: in the “spiritus principalis”! This “spiritus principalis” would then have to be the real priest, but not Jesus of Nazareth, for Christ’s dependence on the “spiritus principalis” would be the same as that of the apostles. The ordained priest could then not act, in virtue of the consecrationed priestly character, “in the Person of Christ”; on the contrary according to the Novus Ordo form, both Christ and the apostles work in an identical way through the “spiritus principalis”. A direct relationship of the Catholic priesthood to Christ thus could not exist because both, He and the ordained priests, would have a parallel relationship with the “spiritus principalis”.
This alone satisfies the requirements of blasphemy! The new rite of episcopal consecration acts as if the true God-Man Jesus Christ was in need of an alien power for the purpose of his redemptive work. This is a, ecclesiastical crime of the first order, the abomination of desolation in the holy place, of which the Saviour warned us. The doctrines of the great ecumenical councils are overthrown as if they were not worth the paper they were written on. Particularly noteworthy here is the great Council of Ephesus, but also the Second Council of Constantinople, where already the first controversy regarding the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Father and the Son (filioque) was held and decided, although few historians understood its significance. The new rite of “episcopal consecration” is a Luciferian rite of initiation which denies the Divinity of Christ by pretending to bestow the plenitude of the priesthood of the New Covenant at the precise moment of this so-called consecration.
Dr Bobus
Why do you consider yourself qualified to judge whether or not it's valid?
mattsixteen24
I'm unable to download booklet. Please allow.
Maximos101 and 2 more users link to this post