@mccallansteve This is no longer the 11th hour, this is the 13th hour - wow that worked out well, 13 their number e.g., rebellion - no excuse for not knowing.
FM is our brother in Christ. Jesus prayed that we Catholics live in unity. Putting a nation before a brother in Christ, goes against Jesus' Teachings, is anti-Catholic. @Still_I_Rise
@Be Ye Separate And the revelations are increasingly clearer that it is a pagan nation. And your Be Ye Separate and your posts reminds us we ALL are urged to come out her, that is, wherever Babylon is.
@Still_I_Rise When i was studying Muhammad, in part because of all the articles being written that his followers could not act civil when they invaded European nations, I was astonished at the enormous amount of brutality he and his gang has inflicted against many peoples. When i commented online about Muhammad's cruelty and blasphemy, numerous people wrote that i was an "Islamaphobe." Now that i …More
@Still_I_Rise When i was studying Muhammad, in part because of all the articles being written that his followers could not act civil when they invaded European nations, I was astonished at the enormous amount of brutality he and his gang has inflicted against many peoples. When i commented online about Muhammad's cruelty and blasphemy, numerous people wrote that i was an "Islamaphobe." Now that i write about the evils and hatred of the Talmud Jews, that i have learned, i am called a "Jew hater." . Our Christ Is The Truth.
@Be Ye Separate Soldier on boldly but to be effective: Veritas in Caritate God bless you and yours and his work at your hands and I really appreciate the support.More
You've never studied Mohammed beyond what E. Michael Jones spoon-fed you, you fraud. Be Ye Separate "When i commented online about Muhammad's cruelty and blasphemy, numerous people wrote that i was an "Islamaphobe."" Probably untrue, given your track-record of exaggerations and falsehoods. Even allowing you the claim, it's still a Fallacy of Anecdotal Evidence. "Now that i write about the evils …More
You've never studied Mohammed beyond what E. Michael Jones spoon-fed you, you fraud. Be Ye Separate
"When i commented online about Muhammad's cruelty and blasphemy, numerous people wrote that i was an "Islamaphobe.""
Probably untrue, given your track-record of exaggerations and falsehoods. Even allowing you the claim, it's still a Fallacy of Anecdotal Evidence.
"Now that i write about the evils and hatred of the Talmud Jews, that i have learned, i am called a "Jew hater."
"that I have learned" :D :D
All dropped into your open little mouth like feeding a baby-bird by E. Michael Jones.
Jones routinely shifts between a racial and religious definition of "Jew" when it suits him. He blames either/ or for purely political ideologies that have nothing to do with Judaism.
As such, the term "Jew hater" is an accurate description. He criticizes people's politics linking them to being "Jewish by birth" as he put it. You do the same, so "Jew hater" applies to you as well.
Wrong again slanderer, I strongly disagree with EMJ on Muhammad, he is too easy on Mo for me. You seem unable to shut up, you even lie regularly, when your point is indefensible. As another Catholic stated when debating you, "you are not of good will." Go Pray.
"Wrong again slanderer, I strongly disagree with EMJ on Muhammad, he is too easy on Mo for me." The source of your "education" has no bearing on the opinion you derived from it. So, no, I'm not wrong nor have I slandered you. Jones' intellectual failings are yours. You even unconsciously paraphrase passages from Jones, even down to the syntax and his style of argument. "You seem unable to shut …More
"Wrong again slanderer, I strongly disagree with EMJ on Muhammad, he is too easy on Mo for me."
The source of your "education" has no bearing on the opinion you derived from it. So, no, I'm not wrong nor have I slandered you.
Jones' intellectual failings are yours. You even unconsciously paraphrase passages from Jones, even down to the syntax and his style of argument.
"You seem unable to shut up, you even lie regularly, when your point is indefensible."
Oh look, the fabrications are appearing now. Always a good sign. My points are always defensible. They're designed to be.
Funny how you're never able to show any of these lies even when I challenge you to do so. You just do what your buddy EMJ taught you: 1.) make a claim, 2.) state the claim is fact, 3.) don't show proof, 4.) repeat 1-3.
Then you wander off and repeat the whole silly business elsewhere.
"As another Catholic stated when debating you, "you are not of good will."