Gloria.TV News on the 16th of December 2016 Ratzinger Polemics: Paolo Rodari writes in the Italian daily la Repubblica that the writings of the young Joseph Ratzinger anticipated what he calls, “the …More
Gloria.TV News on the 16th of December 2016
Ratzinger Polemics: Paolo Rodari writes in the Italian daily la Repubblica that the writings of the young Joseph Ratzinger anticipated what he calls, “the reforms of Bergoglio.” Rodari refers to text published in the seventh volume of Ratzinger’s collected works. He quotes Ratzinger’s polemics against the liturgy at the Council: “Is it normal that 2,500 bishops, not to mention the many other believers, are condemned to be mute witnesses of a liturgy in which, in addition to the celebrant, only the Sistine Chapel has a word?"
Positive Dialogue? At the time Ratzinger also polemicized against sound doctrine, claiming that preceding councils had tried to close down, to preserve and to show the border while Second Vatican Council had entered into a – quote – “positive dialogue with today’s world.” gloria.tv asks the question how this new positive attitude was able to wipe out 90% of the Church within 50 years.
Pro-Death: According to the Lepanto Institute, Sarah Spengeman, the Director of the Catholic Climate Covenant, is a member of the pro-abortion, by appointment only, online EMILY’s List Linkedin group. The irony: On December 3, Spengeman told the San Diego Union-Tribune, “It’s clear that climate change is a pro-life issue.” The only stated mission of EMILY’s List is to elect pro-abortion Democratic women to office. Spengeman also supports homosex pseudo-marriage.
Leftist Agenda: Recently the names of two Notre Dame professors were added to a new website called, “Professor Watchlist.” It lists the names of professors who advance a, “leftist agenda” in classrooms. Now more than 100 Notre Dame Faculty members have requested their names be added to the website as well. The signatories said the professors on the list are, actually, “the sort of company we wish to keep.”
Ratzinger Polemics: Paolo Rodari writes in the Italian daily la Repubblica that the writings of the young Joseph Ratzinger anticipated what he calls, “the reforms of Bergoglio.” Rodari refers to text published in the seventh volume of Ratzinger’s collected works. He quotes Ratzinger’s polemics against the liturgy at the Council: “Is it normal that 2,500 bishops, not to mention the many other believers, are condemned to be mute witnesses of a liturgy in which, in addition to the celebrant, only the Sistine Chapel has a word?"
Positive Dialogue? At the time Ratzinger also polemicized against sound doctrine, claiming that preceding councils had tried to close down, to preserve and to show the border while Second Vatican Council had entered into a – quote – “positive dialogue with today’s world.” gloria.tv asks the question how this new positive attitude was able to wipe out 90% of the Church within 50 years.
Pro-Death: According to the Lepanto Institute, Sarah Spengeman, the Director of the Catholic Climate Covenant, is a member of the pro-abortion, by appointment only, online EMILY’s List Linkedin group. The irony: On December 3, Spengeman told the San Diego Union-Tribune, “It’s clear that climate change is a pro-life issue.” The only stated mission of EMILY’s List is to elect pro-abortion Democratic women to office. Spengeman also supports homosex pseudo-marriage.
Leftist Agenda: Recently the names of two Notre Dame professors were added to a new website called, “Professor Watchlist.” It lists the names of professors who advance a, “leftist agenda” in classrooms. Now more than 100 Notre Dame Faculty members have requested their names be added to the website as well. The signatories said the professors on the list are, actually, “the sort of company we wish to keep.”
rhemes1582
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
How very fortunate the Catholic Media is to have this web site available on such a large scale.
Catholic News over the years! Reporting the hard things, and the happy.
Alerting the faithful, and giving voice to Millions.
Leading the way in internet news for the faithful, and giving good example in fortitude.
Thank You Gloria.TV The More Catholic The Better.More
How very fortunate the Catholic Media is to have this web site available on such a large scale.
Catholic News over the years! Reporting the hard things, and the happy.
Alerting the faithful, and giving voice to Millions.
Leading the way in internet news for the faithful, and giving good example in fortitude.
Thank You Gloria.TV The More Catholic The Better.
Catholic News over the years! Reporting the hard things, and the happy.
Alerting the faithful, and giving voice to Millions.
Leading the way in internet news for the faithful, and giving good example in fortitude.
Thank You Gloria.TV The More Catholic The Better.
It is no secret that at the time of the Council Joseph Ratzinger, then in his mid 30's, was in favor of vernacular liturgy. His later position was mostly against what became the post Vat II liturgical situation, which included the suppression of Latin and versus populum celebration.
He well understood the existence of a project, originating in the Vatican, to persecute those who wanted Latin liturgy.More
It is no secret that at the time of the Council Joseph Ratzinger, then in his mid 30's, was in favor of vernacular liturgy. His later position was mostly against what became the post Vat II liturgical situation, which included the suppression of Latin and versus populum celebration.
He well understood the existence of a project, originating in the Vatican, to persecute those who wanted Latin liturgy.
He well understood the existence of a project, originating in the Vatican, to persecute those who wanted Latin liturgy.
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
RATZINGER POLEMICS APPROVED
Where are the supporters of the four cardinals and the dubbia to correct the errors of Cardinal Ratzinger. Why are they not affirming the Catholic Faith on salvation theology? They are presently in line with the two popes, since they also maintain their prudent silence.
December 16, 2016
Supporters of the four cardinals and the dubbia are not affirming the Catholic Faith. …More
RATZINGER POLEMICS APPROVED
Where are the supporters of the four cardinals and the dubbia to correct the errors of Cardinal Ratzinger. Why are they not affirming the Catholic Faith on salvation theology? They are presently in line with the two popes, since they also maintain their prudent silence.
December 16, 2016
Supporters of the four cardinals and the dubbia are not affirming the Catholic Faith.
John Henry Weston Editor of Life Sites news could simply announce that there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Why does he not affirm the dogma EENS, the traditional teaching on salvation ? He expects Pope Francis to affirm moral theology without exceptions; without subjective exceptions but he will not do the same with Catholic salvation theology.
Moral theology is not controversial but salvation theology is .All these years John Henry Weston would not affirm the dogma EENS since it was not politicaly correct. It could be the same with Pope Francis. He is obliged to make changes in Catholic moral theology to be politically correct.
Cardinal Burke, John Henry Weston, the 23 scholars and the others who rightly support the dubbia, like I do, could also support traditional Catholic salvation theology.
1.They could say the obvious,that the baptism of desire is invisible.
So it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Holy Office and the Archdiocese made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.The magisterium made a mistake.
2.Since the baptism of desire is invisible and not relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus it changes our interpretation of Vatican Council II.The Council Fathers made a mistake at Vatican Council II. They assumed that hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not hypothetical.
So Vatican Council II is really in accord with the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century.The magisterium made a mistake.Let's have LifeSites say this.
3.Since the baptism of desire is always implicit for us, it is hypothetical and not visible any personal case in 2016, it is not an exception to the dogma EENS. So we can affirm invisible for us baptism of desire and also 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.They are compatible. They do not conflict. It does not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction.
So the magisterium made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. It assumed that the baptism of desire was an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.
What stops John Henry Weston, the four cardinals and the 23 cardinals affirming this ? Since they care about Catholic doctrine and believe that the magisterium, like that of Pope Francis', can be wrong so why not clarify the error in Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 16, 2016
The popes are not affirming the faith: but neither are John Henry Weston and Joseph Shaw
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-popes-are-n…
Where are the supporters of the four cardinals and the dubbia to correct the errors of Cardinal Ratzinger. Why are they not affirming the Catholic Faith on salvation theology? They are presently in line with the two popes, since they also maintain their prudent silence.
December 16, 2016
Supporters of the four cardinals and the dubbia are not affirming the Catholic Faith.
John Henry Weston Editor of Life Sites news could simply announce that there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Why does he not affirm the dogma EENS, the traditional teaching on salvation ? He expects Pope Francis to affirm moral theology without exceptions; without subjective exceptions but he will not do the same with Catholic salvation theology.
Moral theology is not controversial but salvation theology is .All these years John Henry Weston would not affirm the dogma EENS since it was not politicaly correct. It could be the same with Pope Francis. He is obliged to make changes in Catholic moral theology to be politically correct.
Cardinal Burke, John Henry Weston, the 23 scholars and the others who rightly support the dubbia, like I do, could also support traditional Catholic salvation theology.
1.They could say the obvious,that the baptism of desire is invisible.
So it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Holy Office and the Archdiocese made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.The magisterium made a mistake.
2.Since the baptism of desire is invisible and not relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus it changes our interpretation of Vatican Council II.The Council Fathers made a mistake at Vatican Council II. They assumed that hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not hypothetical.
So Vatican Council II is really in accord with the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century.The magisterium made a mistake.Let's have LifeSites say this.
3.Since the baptism of desire is always implicit for us, it is hypothetical and not visible any personal case in 2016, it is not an exception to the dogma EENS. So we can affirm invisible for us baptism of desire and also 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.They are compatible. They do not conflict. It does not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction.
So the magisterium made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. It assumed that the baptism of desire was an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.
What stops John Henry Weston, the four cardinals and the 23 cardinals affirming this ? Since they care about Catholic doctrine and believe that the magisterium, like that of Pope Francis', can be wrong so why not clarify the error in Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 16, 2016
The popes are not affirming the faith: but neither are John Henry Weston and Joseph Shaw
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/the-popes-are-n…
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
We cannot blame only Cardinal Ratzinger for the missing 90%. Where was the clarification from Archbishop Lefebvre, the SSPX bishops or Bishop Donald Sanborn the sedevacantists. What about Cardinal Burke and the 23 scholars?
December 17, 2016
Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedes cannot defend themself theologically and doctrinally
See there is no clarification or denial from Bishop Donald Sanborn or …More
We cannot blame only Cardinal Ratzinger for the missing 90%. Where was the clarification from Archbishop Lefebvre, the SSPX bishops or Bishop Donald Sanborn the sedevacantists. What about Cardinal Burke and the 23 scholars?
December 17, 2016
Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedes cannot defend themself theologically and doctrinally
See there is no clarification or denial from Bishop Donald Sanborn or Fr.Cekada. They are teaching the error since it is politically correct.Fr. Leonard Feeney is the scapegoat.
There position is the same as the liberals and it is useful not be charged with being Anti-Semitic or racist etc. So they maintain their seminary in Florida, while they compromise the Faith and deny it.
I have been writing about this for a long time on my blog.Now even when it appears on Gloria TV they cannot defend themself theologically and doctrinally.
They say that the magisterium of Pope Pius XII condemned Fr. Leonard Feeney and they support the magisterium. Yet they reject the magisterium of Pope Paul VI and Vatican Council II.They also reject the magisterium of Pope Francis and are sedevacantists.
1.I affirm the baptism of desire and for me it is always INVISIBLE.The baptism of desire can only be invisible for us human beings.Why does Bishop Sanborn not affirm this? It is something obvious. Even an uneducated person would tell him that the baptism of desire is always a hypothetical case for us, something speculated.
2.Since the baptism of desire is invisible for us it is NOT an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII made an objective mistake. Why does Bishop Sanborn not affirm this?
3.The same religious who made the mistake in 1949 were active at Vatican Council II. So it was a mistake for Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits to mention the case of the unknown catechumen (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) in Vatican Council II.They were never relevant to the dogma EENS.
So Vatican Council II can be interpreted with LG 16 and LG 14 referring to hypothetical cases. Hypothetical cases cannot be explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2016.So why does Bishop Sanborn not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.?This is how I see Vatican Council II. It is the only rational option possible.
Instead on these three points above the position of Bishop Sanborn is the same as that of the liberals and Masons .So he is not persecuted but tolerated by them.
-Lionel Andrades
December 17, 2016
Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedes cannot defend themself theologically and doctrinally
See there is no clarification or denial from Bishop Donald Sanborn or Fr.Cekada. They are teaching the error since it is politically correct.Fr. Leonard Feeney is the scapegoat.
There position is the same as the liberals and it is useful not be charged with being Anti-Semitic or racist etc. So they maintain their seminary in Florida, while they compromise the Faith and deny it.
I have been writing about this for a long time on my blog.Now even when it appears on Gloria TV they cannot defend themself theologically and doctrinally.
They say that the magisterium of Pope Pius XII condemned Fr. Leonard Feeney and they support the magisterium. Yet they reject the magisterium of Pope Paul VI and Vatican Council II.They also reject the magisterium of Pope Francis and are sedevacantists.
1.I affirm the baptism of desire and for me it is always INVISIBLE.The baptism of desire can only be invisible for us human beings.Why does Bishop Sanborn not affirm this? It is something obvious. Even an uneducated person would tell him that the baptism of desire is always a hypothetical case for us, something speculated.
2.Since the baptism of desire is invisible for us it is NOT an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII made an objective mistake. Why does Bishop Sanborn not affirm this?
3.The same religious who made the mistake in 1949 were active at Vatican Council II. So it was a mistake for Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits to mention the case of the unknown catechumen (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) in Vatican Council II.They were never relevant to the dogma EENS.
So Vatican Council II can be interpreted with LG 16 and LG 14 referring to hypothetical cases. Hypothetical cases cannot be explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2016.So why does Bishop Sanborn not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.?This is how I see Vatican Council II. It is the only rational option possible.
Instead on these three points above the position of Bishop Sanborn is the same as that of the liberals and Masons .So he is not persecuted but tolerated by them.
-Lionel Andrades
Holy Cannoli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Gloria.tv asks the question how this new positive attitude was able to wipe out 90% of the Church within 50 years.
This site (PDF file from Georgetown University ) titled Global Catholicism: Trends & Forecasts gives a detailed picture of Catholic demographic changes. Basically Africa and Asia are doing very well. Everywhere else (especially Europe) not so much.More
Gloria.tv asks the question how this new positive attitude was able to wipe out 90% of the Church within 50 years.
This site (PDF file from Georgetown University ) titled Global Catholicism: Trends & Forecasts gives a detailed picture of Catholic demographic changes. Basically Africa and Asia are doing very well. Everywhere else (especially Europe) not so much.
This site (PDF file from Georgetown University ) titled Global Catholicism: Trends & Forecasts gives a detailed picture of Catholic demographic changes. Basically Africa and Asia are doing very well. Everywhere else (especially Europe) not so much.
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Ratzinger's foundation for Amoris Laetitita
Yesterday evening I was reading some of the announcements for the students on one of the Notice Boards of the Ateno Pontificio Regina Apostolurum (APRA),the Legion of Christ university in Rome.There was a course on morals which mentions there were exceptions. This was there in the title of the course.Morals with exceptions!.This was a semester course …More
Ratzinger's foundation for Amoris Laetitita
Yesterday evening I was reading some of the announcements for the students on one of the Notice Boards of the Ateno Pontificio Regina Apostolurum (APRA),the Legion of Christ university in Rome.There was a course on morals which mentions there were exceptions. This was there in the title of the course.Morals with exceptions!.This was a semester course offered for the ISSR(Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose) students .This is for those who want to be qualified teachers of catechism or religion in schools or parishes.They get the degree Laurea Magiseteriale in Scienze religiose.
On the same ISSR Notice Board there was another course announced on salvation theology.It was titled Teologia fondamentale del pluralismo religioso by Prof. Bravo Pereira (Fundamental Theology of Religious Pluralism).It contradicts the Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican(2001) during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II.
Bravo Pereira is forced to teach that there are exceptions to traditional salvation theology. So for him there are subjectively known cases of the baptism of desire, being saved in invincible ignorance,seeds of the Word, imperfect communion with the Church etc.All without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
So the students of the ISSR when they get their degree from the APRA university will go to their parishes and teach the new theology. They will say that not all mortal sins are mortal sins and there can be exceptions (as if we can know) and not every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation, since there are known exceptions of the baptism of desire (as if we can know)etc.
All this is approved by the four cardinals and the 23 scholars since it was approved by Pope Benedict XVI all these years.
Both these courses are teaching the new theology in morals and faith based on the exceptions making the rule.This is expressed directly in Amorits Laetitia.
Pope Francis like the Masons rejects the traditional teachings on morals and calls it legalism. He even rejects
the traditional teachings on salvation and calls its triumphalism. Legalism and triumphalism these are the buzz words I would come across all these years.It has now been made official by Pope Francis.
Yesterday evening I was reading some of the announcements for the students on one of the Notice Boards of the Ateno Pontificio Regina Apostolurum (APRA),the Legion of Christ university in Rome.There was a course on morals which mentions there were exceptions. This was there in the title of the course.Morals with exceptions!.This was a semester course offered for the ISSR(Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose) students .This is for those who want to be qualified teachers of catechism or religion in schools or parishes.They get the degree Laurea Magiseteriale in Scienze religiose.
On the same ISSR Notice Board there was another course announced on salvation theology.It was titled Teologia fondamentale del pluralismo religioso by Prof. Bravo Pereira (Fundamental Theology of Religious Pluralism).It contradicts the Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican(2001) during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II.
Bravo Pereira is forced to teach that there are exceptions to traditional salvation theology. So for him there are subjectively known cases of the baptism of desire, being saved in invincible ignorance,seeds of the Word, imperfect communion with the Church etc.All without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
So the students of the ISSR when they get their degree from the APRA university will go to their parishes and teach the new theology. They will say that not all mortal sins are mortal sins and there can be exceptions (as if we can know) and not every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation, since there are known exceptions of the baptism of desire (as if we can know)etc.
All this is approved by the four cardinals and the 23 scholars since it was approved by Pope Benedict XVI all these years.
Both these courses are teaching the new theology in morals and faith based on the exceptions making the rule.This is expressed directly in Amorits Laetitia.
Pope Francis like the Masons rejects the traditional teachings on morals and calls it legalism. He even rejects
the traditional teachings on salvation and calls its triumphalism. Legalism and triumphalism these are the buzz words I would come across all these years.It has now been made official by Pope Francis.
AveMaria44
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"gloria.tv asks the question how this new positive attitude was able to wipe out 90% of the Church within 50 years." C'est une bonne question. L'ouverture au monde, la "luthérianisation" de l’Église cela pourrait s’appeler aussi l'apostasie.