Francis Is Spying on His Collaborators
Francis has given the green light between 2019 and 2020 to surveillance methods that are incompatible with international law. The investigation of financial crimes was used as a pretext. If such spying …More
Francis has given the green light between 2019 and 2020 to surveillance methods that are incompatible with international law.
The investigation of financial crimes was used as a pretext. If such spying methods are available, they can be used against everybody in the Vatican.
TvSvizzera.it (January 3) quotes from one of the four Rescripts signed by Francis. It says that "technological instruments suitable for intercepting fixed and mobile telephone calls, as well as other communications, including electronic ones, may be used".
In short: in Francis' Vatican, telephone conversations, chats and emails are spied on.
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsKmldjzzfoj
The investigation of financial crimes was used as a pretext. If such spying methods are available, they can be used against everybody in the Vatican.
TvSvizzera.it (January 3) quotes from one of the four Rescripts signed by Francis. It says that "technological instruments suitable for intercepting fixed and mobile telephone calls, as well as other communications, including electronic ones, may be used".
In short: in Francis' Vatican, telephone conversations, chats and emails are spied on.
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsKmldjzzfoj
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Angelo Santelli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
lifesitenews.com/…-for-pope-francis-following-attacks-on-latin-mass/
Forget praying: One cannot be an Occasionalist. This requires a response like Judas Maccabaeus effectuated against Antiochus IV Epiphanes who wanted to outlaw and end all Jewish circumcision. Maccabaeus had the desecrators of Jewish circumcision routed by the faithful followers of Torah.More
lifesitenews.com/…-for-pope-francis-following-attacks-on-latin-mass/
Forget praying: One cannot be an Occasionalist. This requires a response like Judas Maccabaeus effectuated against Antiochus IV Epiphanes who wanted to outlaw and end all Jewish circumcision. Maccabaeus had the desecrators of Jewish circumcision routed by the faithful followers of Torah.
Forget praying: One cannot be an Occasionalist. This requires a response like Judas Maccabaeus effectuated against Antiochus IV Epiphanes who wanted to outlaw and end all Jewish circumcision. Maccabaeus had the desecrators of Jewish circumcision routed by the faithful followers of Torah.
Jan Joseph
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Ja natuurlijk het is paus Franciscus weer die criminele activiteiten uitvoert.
Is er nu niemand in de Rooms Katholieke kerk die zo verstandig is om een schisma uit te roepen en paus Franciscus achter de tralies kan krijgen?
Is er nu niemand in de Rooms Katholieke kerk die zo verstandig is om een schisma uit te roepen en paus Franciscus achter de tralies kan krijgen?
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This guy Francis is SICK! Not just seriously ill physically, but mental. This nutjob should be sacked!
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Excuse me for asking, Kenjiro-san... who in The Church has temporal authority to "sack" The Church's highest temporal authority?
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The College of Cardinals, if enough of them gather and demand his resignation. It's happened several times before, but not since the 12th century. A pope is the guardian of tradition, and the dogma of the Church, the Magesterium which has been passed on from generation to generation. It's also called the Deposit of the Faith (meaning all the accumulated traditions and teachings of the Church from …More
The College of Cardinals, if enough of them gather and demand his resignation. It's happened several times before, but not since the 12th century. A pope is the guardian of tradition, and the dogma of the Church, the Magesterium which has been passed on from generation to generation. It's also called the Deposit of the Faith (meaning all the accumulated traditions and teachings of the Church from Apostolic times. It is bad enough that much of the interpretations of VAtican II both the pastoral (not dogmatic) constitutions , as well as the experimentations/deviations/rupture in liturgy departed from the teachings of the Church, but when a Pope (Bergoglio) has continually taught contrary to, or supported agendas contrary to the teachings of the Church (regarding homosexuality, LGBTQ persons, transgenders/so called transsexuals, etc. among other things, then it is the right of the Cardinals to depose him. IN EFFECT, by deliberatly teaching error, that which is contrary to the Faith, any Pope (Bergoglio) would automatically depose himself for teaching heresy. Saint Thomas Aquinas stated that the Cardinals in that situation have a right to remove a pope, as did other later Church theologians, including Doctors of the Church. A pope can't depart completely from the Faith and support something totally the opposite (Bergoglio and blessing of the Pachamamma statue, 2019). etc. Even Cardinal Burke and others have stated that a Pope who by actions and teachings departs from the Faith and Tradition, he could be deposed.
Now, none of these VAtican II Cardinals will do that....they are all weaklings cowering under the shadow Bergoglio has cast over the Church, especially with his "Traditiones Custodes" rampage. But they could...........and should.
Now, none of these VAtican II Cardinals will do that....they are all weaklings cowering under the shadow Bergoglio has cast over the Church, especially with his "Traditiones Custodes" rampage. But they could...........and should.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Nope. A Pope doesn't have blanket permission to do as he pleases. Of course, in this VAtican II Church, none of the CArdinals will stand up to Bergoglio, and he will do as he pleases. But that in itself is sick, for the faithful to allow for him to do so.
It sounds like a ridiculous comparison, but as a history teacher, (even though I'm only 28), I know that the the Middle Ages, there were several …More
Nope. A Pope doesn't have blanket permission to do as he pleases. Of course, in this VAtican II Church, none of the CArdinals will stand up to Bergoglio, and he will do as he pleases. But that in itself is sick, for the faithful to allow for him to do so.
It sounds like a ridiculous comparison, but as a history teacher, (even though I'm only 28), I know that the the Middle Ages, there were several bad popes (8th and 9th centuries) who did whatever they pleased- had mistresses, illegit children, multiple wives taught heresy, etc- but were elected because they belonged to a certain powerful family who had the militia to back themselves up. It's like in Japan a daimyo (local governor) in the times of the Tokugawa Shogunate having his own small army of samurai to defend his territory and his honor and to enforce his laws in the name of the Shogun. But eventually, these bad early Medieval popes (before celibacy was mandatory, etc), were eventually deposed by the cardinals and electors. Cardinals didn't become the full electors of popes till the 11th century. Before that, the local people did, as well as powerful families. The guy from the strongest family won. Later that was seen as corrupt, so the College of Cardinals was instituted.
But no, just because Bergoglio is the highest authority in the Church doesn't mean he is unimpeachable. If he goes against Church teaching, teaches heresy, or repudiates time honored traditions of the Church and tries to invent something new and force it on people....but especially if he blatantly departs from the Faith and teaches heresy...not only can he be forces to resign/be impeached by the Cardinals, but he by his heretical teachings and actions has deposed himself, and therefore the faithful are not bound to obey him, or respect him as the legit Pope. By his teachings and actions against the Faith, he has forfeited that right.
It sounds like a ridiculous comparison, but as a history teacher, (even though I'm only 28), I know that the the Middle Ages, there were several bad popes (8th and 9th centuries) who did whatever they pleased- had mistresses, illegit children, multiple wives taught heresy, etc- but were elected because they belonged to a certain powerful family who had the militia to back themselves up. It's like in Japan a daimyo (local governor) in the times of the Tokugawa Shogunate having his own small army of samurai to defend his territory and his honor and to enforce his laws in the name of the Shogun. But eventually, these bad early Medieval popes (before celibacy was mandatory, etc), were eventually deposed by the cardinals and electors. Cardinals didn't become the full electors of popes till the 11th century. Before that, the local people did, as well as powerful families. The guy from the strongest family won. Later that was seen as corrupt, so the College of Cardinals was instituted.
But no, just because Bergoglio is the highest authority in the Church doesn't mean he is unimpeachable. If he goes against Church teaching, teaches heresy, or repudiates time honored traditions of the Church and tries to invent something new and force it on people....but especially if he blatantly departs from the Faith and teaches heresy...not only can he be forces to resign/be impeached by the Cardinals, but he by his heretical teachings and actions has deposed himself, and therefore the faithful are not bound to obey him, or respect him as the legit Pope. By his teachings and actions against the Faith, he has forfeited that right.
Chad jeremy roberts
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
A real Judas in the culprit.
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"The investigation of financial crimes was used as a pretext..." ...no word about the money wired to Australia before Cdl. Pell was falsely accused.