Sorry Jim Dorchak. The IRS is admitting this group meets its definitions as a tax-exempt religion, nothing more. JTLiuzza America's "error of religious freedom" has worked very well compared to the alternatives seen in history and even in the Middle East today. Never assume your own religious group will always have political supremacy. Better to allow religious error to have rights under law than …More
Sorry Jim Dorchak. The IRS is admitting this group meets its definitions as a tax-exempt religion, nothing more.
JTLiuzza America's "error of religious freedom" has worked very well compared to the alternatives seen in history and even in the Middle East today. Never assume your own religious group will always have political supremacy. Better to allow religious error to have rights under law than to lay the ground-work for having your own rights taken away.
So we make all religions equal in standing before the law and have an equal right to exist, which is a lie because there is only one true religion, simply because we're afraid we will be persecuted when we don't have "political supremacy?" Sorry, ultra. That's not only an error in violation of the first commandment, it's abject cowardice. The Great Commission demands that we baptize all nations in …More
So we make all religions equal in standing before the law and have an equal right to exist, which is a lie because there is only one true religion, simply because we're afraid we will be persecuted when we don't have "political supremacy?"
Sorry, ultra. That's not only an error in violation of the first commandment, it's abject cowardice.
The Great Commission demands that we baptize all nations in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. There will always be error in this vale of tears. Not persecuting followers of heathen religions is one thing. Pretending that they have equal standing with the One True Faith is a blasphemy.
The error of "religious freedom" as understood in the US and by the modernists in Rome laid bare for all to see. All "religions" treated as equal by force of law, elevating error to equal footing with truth. How will the ecumaniacs in Rome openly deal with this "religion?" Firm condemnation? Or "dialogue?"
