@credo-Sorry, but I know many people who would agree with me. If I had a choice as to who was a legit Bishop, one appointed by the SSPX or Williamson- someone they pick who is a scholar and a holy person in the Faith and who loves the Church and tradition, OR a theologically illiterate buffoon who has "the smell of the sheep" and the poor, who disregards any and all Catholic teachings that don't suit the times regardless what they are, who hates Catholic piety and tradition including the Roman Latin Mass, who preaches heresy and is an apostate, who is open to blessings for sodomy, who welcomes homosexuals and TRANS into the Church and applaudes their lifestyle....then I'd support the SSPX and/or sede-vacantist newly appointed bishops because I know they will lead me and other faithful to Heaven, not to Hell.

It is you Yoshimori who are deciding that the behavior of Williamson is legitimate, not Almighty God.

The reality is they have placed themselves OUTSIDE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF THE CHURCH. Therefore they cannot be receiving the fruits and graces of THE CHURCH.

What you have said may be true for the short term, however the whole exercise of Williamson and his clique will prove to be disastrous.
It follows that your support for them is doomed to the same fate.

Credo is right. The devil always plays both sides of the street. Bishop Williamson is willy nilly making secret bishops without any proof that they have been correctly done or whether the candidates are fit for purpose. Yoshimori - you speak of h0mo-loving bishops - well check out Bishop Williamson's past: Carlos Urrutigoity is one of the biggest scandals in the church and it was Bishop Williamson who pushed for and defended his ordination despite prior and official warnings of Urrutigoity being a dangerous predator. Bishop Williamson also sent a priest, who had been formally taken off the circuit for two accounts of child abuse, back into circulation to stay with a family full of young boys. What guarantees can you give me that His Lordship will not make the same grave mistakes again? What makes him different from all those other bishops who have allowed this stuff near our children? Becareful - sometimes when we are so focused on what we are backing away from, we neglect to check what we are backing into. T

@Carol H -I didn't know about Williamson's failures regarding the homo priests he allowed back into service or ordination. That was wrong. But the bottom line is that regardless of his misjudgements, Williamson represents a true line of bishops, and upholds true Catholic belief and tradition, especially in the traditonal Roman Mass....not the fabricated, make -it-up as you wish Vatican II trash I, and so many other Catholics were unfortunate enough to grow up with. I found my Catholic Faith at 23, (I'm only 28), after going to the Latin Mass with my Aunt, after spending the previous 15+ years in the worthless Novus Ordo and seeing more abuses than I can count ( like a priest giving a dog Holy Communion).
So regardless of Williamson's errors, he's a real Bishop, and so are his appointees. Not the heretics and homo-lovers appointed by "pope" Francis.

Actions speak louder than words. Many of the priests that Bishop williamson has ordained or mentored are problem priests/ex-priests today. By way of example, I provided two dangerous errors of judgement commited by His Lordship; I could provide dozens more. As you will agree, its not enough to talk the talk - its how one puts that talk into action. Spouting dogmas and appearing to up hold certain Catholic traditions is pointless if one regularly commits actions that undermine the very foundation of the Church and place children in danger. Introducing unworthy and even dangerous candidates into the priesthood is just as bad as anything else you have accused modernist clergy of. Naturally I and others are concerned. Especially now that Bishop Williamson is ordaining bishops in secret.