Confused Cardinal Replaced Liturgy with "Loyalty"
![](https://seedus0275.gloriatv.net/storage1/jbp772k58pphx79x9x822j2ok039pihpwsik6s5.webp?scale=on&secure=VdWmidANALoE6M2f5oyvMw&expires=1724037735)
In July 1965, Heenan wrote, “I much prefer the Latin. But we must face facts. The wish of the Church expressed by the almost unanimous vote in the Council is for permission to e given for the use of the mother tongue.” In reality, Vatican II allowed the vernacular only for small parts of the liturgy.
In March 1966, Heenan spoke of an “experimental stage” and of “no fear that the treasures of the Latin sung liturgy will be sacrificed.”
In April 1967, he found it “hard to get used to the new liturgy.” But, “You must try to be humble and accept what the Church has decided,” he moralised.
In February 1969, Heenan observed that “it is impossible to feel at home amid all the changes in the liturgy”. He called the liturgical turmoil "a great test of loyalty to the Holy See" adding that "we have to obey.“
Heenan wondered about “the extent to which we are committed to make changes – including the removal of the tabernacle from the high altar.”
Picture: John Heenan © wikicommons, CC BY-SA, #newsFzisjaobwr
![](https://seedus3932.gloriatv.net/storage1/3mvvg9xyn23orlu79btn45lifvtzhz8s0xhjw3g.webp?crop=2849.1761&scale=on&secure=FiAWcb3uB9GfrizfAixNcw&expires=1724004869)
![](https://seedus6826.gloriatv.net/storage1/reo8qdxz494e937gvxfft1vdltbcqluesmdtr9e.webp?crop=2354.1455.0.570&scale=on&secure=qU3X8kz-CIFeRB7Tj8hOKA&expires=1724063121)
![](https://seedus0275.gloriatv.net/storage1/73pugx92xjefrgb0bpw142pddioga1mvexenr13.webp?crop=3335.2061.0.62&scale=on&secure=awSuBwExstmRAuUF2rkNGg&expires=1723991755)
![](https://seedus0275.gloriatv.net/storage1/5x7dnvek3fja9b4rllwbn54106j91bivogh2for.webp?crop=3093.1912&scale=on&secure=bgAi7gCPtY2ivc8yhVCjrw&expires=1724041956)
![](https://seedus3932.gloriatv.net/storage1/9erhjatl06ql9ehthpnt4ob2t6mm37mm6x09ghr.webp?crop=2593.1603.0.589&scale=on&secure=SuD2vI3K0Dw1Zja2Vc1VTg&expires=1724003400)