The "New York Times" wants to censor pro-life websites on Facebook as "fake news". The pretense is "science" (which tells us, by the way, that human life begins at conception).
nytimes.com
Opinion | Facebook Is Ignoring Anti-Abortion Fake News
Photo Colin Stretch, general counsel for Facebook, testifying on Capitol Hill last week. Credit Eric Thayer for The New York Times Last year, just …
Not only the New York Times wants to censor so called "fake news" (what's not in main stream) but all European "scientific" societies censor abstracts submitted by researchers dealing e.g. with a possible link between breast cancer and abortion or the pill or other hormone active birth control devices like e.g. hormone IUD. A couple of years ago in Austria the two biggest studies regarding Hormone …More
Not only the New York Times wants to censor so called "fake news" (what's not in main stream) but all European "scientific" societies censor abstracts submitted by researchers dealing e.g. with a possible link between breast cancer and abortion or the pill or other hormone active birth control devices like e.g. hormone IUD. A couple of years ago in Austria the two biggest studies regarding Hormone Replacement Therapy dealing with postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US "Woman Health Initiative" and the British one "One Million Women Study" were stopped by the then Minister Gehrer because of negative affects like thrombosis (significant + 111%) and Breast Cancer (not significant +26%). One important question was raised in a Vienna Senology congress (around 2002-2006) "Why does Estrogen know producing cancer in HRT but not in the Pill?" The astonishing effect was SILENCE. After a too long rhetorical pause the chairman answered "We should that discuss during the coffee break!" Within moments the whole audience had disappeared.
