Homosex: Now Malta Church Goes Down
On social media, the poster is overwhelmingly supported by Novus Ordo Catholics who, as is well-known, cannot distinguish between the wolf and the shepherd.
#newsTjjangxxid
On social media, the poster is overwhelmingly supported by Novus Ordo Catholics who, as is well-known, cannot distinguish between the wolf and the shepherd.
#newsTjjangxxid
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Rafał_Ovile
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Good example of how legitimizing Francis backfires on further destruction of Mother Church and deception of souls. When will finally Catholics come to position of Abp Vigano, unite and successfully resist ? Let us fervently pray !
SonoftheChurch
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
We lost Malta a long time ago. Darkness reigns on those once fair islands.
Malki Tzedek
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Dear Malta, how far you have drifted from your long held Pauline legacy.
Ivan Tomas
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@Malki Tzedek, about Pauline legacy speaking...
Saint Paul had shipwreck on Croatian island of Mljet, and not on Malta. This is the subject of the monumental book written in elite Latin by Ignatio Georgio (Ignjat Đurđevic), 1675-1737, published in Venice in 1730. Ignjat Đurđevic was Croatian Baroque writer from the city of Dubrovnik. The island of Mljet is not far from Dubrovnik.
Ignjat Djurdjevic …More
@Malki Tzedek, about Pauline legacy speaking...
Saint Paul had shipwreck on Croatian island of Mljet, and not on Malta. This is the subject of the monumental book written in elite Latin by Ignatio Georgio (Ignjat Đurđevic), 1675-1737, published in Venice in 1730. Ignjat Đurđevic was Croatian Baroque writer from the city of Dubrovnik. The island of Mljet is not far from Dubrovnik.
Ignjat Djurdjevic: St Paul was on the island of Mljet in the Adriatic for three months
Saint Paul had shipwreck on Croatian island of Mljet, and not on Malta. This is the subject of the monumental book written in elite Latin by Ignatio Georgio (Ignjat Đurđevic), 1675-1737, published in Venice in 1730. Ignjat Đurđevic was Croatian Baroque writer from the city of Dubrovnik. The island of Mljet is not far from Dubrovnik.
Ignjat Djurdjevic: St Paul was on the island of Mljet in the Adriatic for three months
Malki Tzedek
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This is very fascinating; thank you for sharing this @Ivan Tomas. Nonetheless, when I visited Malta many years ago, the legend(?) of St. Paul permeated the island wherever I went, and, myth or not, it appeared to be a bedrock for all of the churches I visited and the faithful I met. I appreciate your adding to my sum of knowledge, as meagre as it is!
Ivan Tomas
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
You're welcome @Malki Tzedek .
Interesting to know is that the island of Mljet (lat. Melita) has always had a lot of men named Paul.
And that the island of Mljet is the only island out of 1,200 Croatian islands in the Adriatic Sea where snakes live.
"1 Et cum evasissemus, tunc cognovimus quia Melita insula vocabatur. Barbari vero praestabant non modicam humanitatem nobis. 2 Accensa enim pyra, …More
You're welcome @Malki Tzedek .
Interesting to know is that the island of Mljet (lat. Melita) has always had a lot of men named Paul.
And that the island of Mljet is the only island out of 1,200 Croatian islands in the Adriatic Sea where snakes live.
"1 Et cum evasissemus, tunc cognovimus quia Melita insula vocabatur. Barbari vero praestabant non modicam humanitatem nobis. 2 Accensa enim pyra, reficiebant nos omnes propter imbrem, qui imminebat, et frigus. 3 Cum congregasset autem Paulus sarmentorum aliquantam multitudinem, et imposuisset super ignem, vipera a calore cum processisset, invasit manum ejus."
(The Acts 28, 1-3)
Interesting to know is that the island of Mljet (lat. Melita) has always had a lot of men named Paul.
And that the island of Mljet is the only island out of 1,200 Croatian islands in the Adriatic Sea where snakes live.
"1 Et cum evasissemus, tunc cognovimus quia Melita insula vocabatur. Barbari vero praestabant non modicam humanitatem nobis. 2 Accensa enim pyra, reficiebant nos omnes propter imbrem, qui imminebat, et frigus. 3 Cum congregasset autem Paulus sarmentorum aliquantam multitudinem, et imposuisset super ignem, vipera a calore cum processisset, invasit manum ejus."
(The Acts 28, 1-3)
Boanerges Boanerges
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Are sacraments valid by those priests who are not Catholic any more (they are only wearing Catholic robes but they preach satan’s religion of sodomy)?
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
They are valid, with proper form/matter, and the intention to do what the Church does. Bad priests should be avoided, as far as possible, but, if they are truly priests, even their most horrible sins can not erase what God has done in them. God can still sanctify through them, even if they are unholy.
Boanerges Boanerges
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
But they are not just unholy priests - they are not Catholic any more. Can sacraments be administered by Non-Catholics?
Jeffrey Ade
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@Boanerges Boanerges You are right! They are apostates and can not confect the Sacraments. Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!
Novena - Oremus
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Here is Westminster Cardinal Vincent Nichols celebrating a Homosex Eucharist last Sunday.
English Catholic
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
It's not the first time he's done it - and he knows - because some of them are publicly and blatantly open about the fact that they are sexually active and not a group that accepts Church teaching on homosexual activity. This flies in the face of the 1986 Vatican document on the pastoral care of homosexuals:
14. With this in mind, this Congregation wishes to ask the Bishops to be especially cautious …More
It's not the first time he's done it - and he knows - because some of them are publicly and blatantly open about the fact that they are sexually active and not a group that accepts Church teaching on homosexual activity. This flies in the face of the 1986 Vatican document on the pastoral care of homosexuals:
14. With this in mind, this Congregation wishes to ask the Bishops to be especially cautious of any programmes which may seek to pressure the Church to change her teaching, even while claiming not to do so. A careful examination of their public statements and the activities they promote reveals a studied ambiguity by which they attempt to mislead the pastors and the faithful. For example, they may present the teaching of the Magisterium, but only as if it were an optional source for the formation of one's conscience. Its specific authority is not recognized. Some of these groups will use the word "Catholic" to describe either the organization or its intended members, yet they do not defend and promote the teaching of the Magisterium; indeed, they even openly attack it. While their members may claim a desire to conform their lives to the teaching of Jesus, in fact they abandon the teaching of his Church. This contradictory action should not have the support of the Bishops in any way.
15. We encourage the Bishops, then, to provide pastoral care in full accord with the teaching of the Church for homosexual persons of their dioceses. No authentic pastoral programme will include organizations in which homosexual persons associate with each other without clearly stating that homosexual activity is immoral. A truly pastoral approach will appreciate the need for homosexual persons to avoid the near occasions of sin. We would heartily encourage programmes where these dangers are avoided. But we wish to make it clear that departure from the Church's teaching, or silence about it, in an effort to provide pastoral care is neither caring nor pastoral. Only what is true can ultimately be pastoral. The neglect of the Church's position prevents homosexual men and women from receiving the care they need and deserve.
vatican.va/…con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html
14. With this in mind, this Congregation wishes to ask the Bishops to be especially cautious of any programmes which may seek to pressure the Church to change her teaching, even while claiming not to do so. A careful examination of their public statements and the activities they promote reveals a studied ambiguity by which they attempt to mislead the pastors and the faithful. For example, they may present the teaching of the Magisterium, but only as if it were an optional source for the formation of one's conscience. Its specific authority is not recognized. Some of these groups will use the word "Catholic" to describe either the organization or its intended members, yet they do not defend and promote the teaching of the Magisterium; indeed, they even openly attack it. While their members may claim a desire to conform their lives to the teaching of Jesus, in fact they abandon the teaching of his Church. This contradictory action should not have the support of the Bishops in any way.
15. We encourage the Bishops, then, to provide pastoral care in full accord with the teaching of the Church for homosexual persons of their dioceses. No authentic pastoral programme will include organizations in which homosexual persons associate with each other without clearly stating that homosexual activity is immoral. A truly pastoral approach will appreciate the need for homosexual persons to avoid the near occasions of sin. We would heartily encourage programmes where these dangers are avoided. But we wish to make it clear that departure from the Church's teaching, or silence about it, in an effort to provide pastoral care is neither caring nor pastoral. Only what is true can ultimately be pastoral. The neglect of the Church's position prevents homosexual men and women from receiving the care they need and deserve.
vatican.va/…con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html