Tucho Defends Himself Against "Some Groups on the Internet Who Create Doubt"
Soft porn author Tucho Fernández is "very attentive to what is published on the internet", journalist Delia Gallagher wrote on X.com.
During his press conference on 4 November, in which he rejected the title 'Co-Redemptrix' for Our Lady, Tucho mentioned several times that "some groups on the web create doubt instead of harmony".
He criticized that "someone" had obtained and published the document 'Mater Populi Fidelis' (Mother of the Faithful People) opposing Catholic Marian titles in advance. These unnamed websites were MessaInLatina.it and SilereNonPossum.com.
Fernàndez lamented that these early news reports reprinting his document did "not provide a full picture", causing upset among commenters.
Why anyone would even care what "Kissy" has to say about doctrine, and much less about the Immaculata, is beyond me - he is not even Catholic and he is a porn-author.
What groups are creating doubts? There is no doubt that the Blessed Virgin Mary is the Co-Redemptrix of the human race, just as there is no doubt that Tucho is a complete heretic and has no connection whatsoever to the Catholic Church. His vile document is not worthy of being printed even on toilet paper, because it might stain your butt.
The homosexual Tucho and the gay activist Robert Prevost deny in practice that Jesus Christ is the only Redeemer because this truth would dismantle the apostate ecumenical movement with which they wage war against the Redemption of Christ and his Universal Reign.
"The new false pope is already scheming, even before he ascends to the Throne of the Seat of Peter, to denounce the Teachings of my Son. Then he will denounce me, the Blessed Mother of God and ridicule my role as Co-Redemptrix..." Book of Truth, Apr 10, 2012 Mother of Salvation: The time for me to crush …
OUR LADY CO-REDEMPTRIX ‘ DEVELOPS’ Over the centuries we know that Our Lady has been described as Co-Redemptrix and Dispenser of all Graces, she existed with the Divine Will, it was always within Her. Her Heart was joined to Jesus. Graces from Jesus flow through Her, in her role as Mediatrix of all Graces, born without sin. She is the Mother of God. This cannot be contradicted. She has been given a Special Role for these end times, a warrior’s role, ‘who is she who cometh fair as the moon bright as the sun, terrible as an army in battle array’. Neither can Cardinal Fernandez correct what is common knowledge - that LG 8, 14, and 16 are hypothetical and invisible always.Even King Edward and the Protestants who have a problem with Our Lady, would tell Fernandez that they cannot see or meet someone saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) in London in 2025-2026. So Ad Gentes 7 is not contradicted by LG 16. The Athanasius Creed is not contradicted by LG 14.AG 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and LG 8, 14, 16 , UR 3, NA 2 are not exceptions for AG 7, EENS or the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass. So Pope Leo and the cardinals agree with that layman in Rome who has no academic degree in philosophy and theology. LG 14 and 16 are always hypothetical .I may not be a theologian but of one thing I am dead-sure - LG 14 and LG 16 are always hypothetical-24 hours a day. It means the New Ecumenism is false .UR 3 refers to a hypothetical case. So it does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church only. There cannot be a development of doctrine by confusing what is implicit (LG 14, LG 16) as being explicit in 1965-2025. This is being dishonest. John Henry Newman a doctor of the Church said doctrines develop until they become dogma. Then there is no development. EENS cannot develop by projecting invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS and then claiming that it is not always necessary to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation (1949 LOHO). This is a rejection of the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils which did not mention any exceptions.This is CDF /DDF/ Holy Office heresy and schism. We do not know of any exceptions in real life. So the DDF /CDF/ Holy Office made an objective mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO). They repeated the mistake at Vatican Council II when the 1949 LOHO was referenced in Lumen Gentium 16.It was placed in the Denzinger with the mistake. It was repeated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church by Morandi and Di Noia of the CDF. In a public communication they wanted Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, NH to accept invisible cases of CCC 847-848 as being visible exceptions for CCC 845-846 ( outside the Church no salvation).The same mistake was repeated by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria in two papers of the International Theological Commission. So a New Theology was brought into the Church. It says outside the Church there is salvation, known salvation in particular cases. This was irrational, dishonest and non traditional. It was schism with the founders of the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. So when Cardinal Fernandez issued a statement on Our Lady Co-Redemptrix, it is part of ‘the Church seeking a deeper understanding’ of this issue. A ‘development of doctrine ‘. It could change in future just like Pope Leo's understanding of Vatican Council II. The Council is rational for Paulo Ruffini, Fr. Antonio Spadero and Andrea Monda. – Lionel Andrades L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE … L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE WITH AI ON ‘X’ : POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL. L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE … A.I ON ‘X’ INDICATES POPE LEO IS IN PUBLIC SCHISM WHICH WAS AN IMPEDIMENT IN HIS ELECTION BY THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS ALSO IN SCHISM. A.I ON ‘X’ INDICATES POPE LEO IS IN PUBLIC … A.I ON ‘X’ CONFIRMS : A SCHISM FROM THE LEFT IS EXPECTED IF THE POPE CLARIFIES THAT LG 14,16 ETC IN VATICAN COUNCIL II REFER TO HYPOTHETICAL A.I ON ‘X’ CONFIRMS : A SCHISM FROM THE LEFT IS … A. I SEES SCHISM OVER VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL : THE CATHOLIC CHURCH RETURNS TO THE MIDDLE AGES A. I SEES SCHISM OVER VATICAN COUNCIL II … WILL VATICAN COUNCIL RATIONAL CHANGE DONORS ?: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BECOMES CONSERVATIVE. WILL VATICAN COUNCIL RATIONAL CHANGE DONORS ?: …