Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò: Bergoglio’s continual actions against the faith reveal ‘defect of …
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's latest response to Bishop Athanasius Schneider. In theory, a Pontiff’s governing action remains valid and effective even where a single act may be questionable; but in …More
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's latest response to Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
In theory, a Pontiff’s governing action remains valid and effective even where a single act may be questionable; but in practice, an unbroken and consistent series of acts blatantly contrary to the purpose for which the Papacy exists demonstrates – not the Pope’s human fallibility in governing decisions (in which he is not infallibly assisted by the Holy Spirit and can therefore err) – but rather the determination to use papal authority and the power that comes with it for subversive purposes: this invalidates the authority itself not only in individual acts, but in their entirety, because it reveals Bergoglio’s mens rea and his incompatibility with the function he holds.
This uninterrupted series of acts, contrary to the purpose of the Munus petrinum, which began from his first appearance on the balcony of the Vatican, confirms his defect of consent in the assumption of the Papacy, which Bergoglio intended …More
In theory, a Pontiff’s governing action remains valid and effective even where a single act may be questionable; but in practice, an unbroken and consistent series of acts blatantly contrary to the purpose for which the Papacy exists demonstrates – not the Pope’s human fallibility in governing decisions (in which he is not infallibly assisted by the Holy Spirit and can therefore err) – but rather the determination to use papal authority and the power that comes with it for subversive purposes: this invalidates the authority itself not only in individual acts, but in their entirety, because it reveals Bergoglio’s mens rea and his incompatibility with the function he holds.
This uninterrupted series of acts, contrary to the purpose of the Munus petrinum, which began from his first appearance on the balcony of the Vatican, confirms his defect of consent in the assumption of the Papacy, which Bergoglio intended …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Rafał_Ovile
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bp. Schneider's reasoning is based on false base premise. That is Francis's pontificate was never challenged by another claimant to the Petrine Office. Well in accordance to visible reality there was pope Benedict XVI, attacked and ousted, who died on 31.12.2022, and unfortunately continuously ignored by Bp. Schneider and many other Churchmen. Will there finally be a man of fortitude to show His …More
Bp. Schneider's reasoning is based on false base premise. That is Francis's pontificate was never challenged by another claimant to the Petrine Office. Well in accordance to visible reality there was pope Benedict XVI, attacked and ousted, who died on 31.12.2022, and unfortunately continuously ignored by Bp. Schneider and many other Churchmen. Will there finally be a man of fortitude to show His Excellency pope BXVI's documents clearly claiming the Office and pictures of him being dressed as pope untill his death ?
Bazsó-Dombi Attila shares this
- Report
Remove share
Bishop Schneider’s arguments in defense of the thesis that it is preferable to leave the Argentine Jesuit on the Throne rather than recognize the invalidity of his election due to a defect of consent, on the grounds that this would create division in the Church (rectius: the ecclesial body, since the Church is one and indivisible) are completely untenable, because the unity of the Mystical Body –…More
Bishop Schneider’s arguments in defense of the thesis that it is preferable to leave the Argentine Jesuit on the Throne rather than recognize the invalidity of his election due to a defect of consent, on the grounds that this would create division in the Church (rectius: the ecclesial body, since the Church is one and indivisible) are completely untenable, because the unity of the Mystical Body – that is, of its members with the Head – is a unity of Charity in Truth, so whoever is not in Truth cannot be in Charity either.
Bazsó-Dombi Attila
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bazsó-Dombi Attila
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment