@Ultraviolet
You are a Pharisee filled with inward hatred toward anything that departs from your medievalist narrowminded conception of catholicism and ignorant to the last that the mass you cling to was itself invented nearly 500 years ago.
ALL THAT MATTERS TO WHITED SEPULCHRES LIKE YOU AND YOUR ILK ARE OUTWARD EXTERNAL APPEARENCES
I have sadly met your type many times hissing and spitting at catholics who attend the NO mass.
TRULY REVOLTING PEOPLE LIKE REPEL ANY REAL OR POSSIBLE INTEREST ANYBODY WOULD EVER DESIRE TO HAVE IN ATTENDING OR BEING INVOLVED WITH TRADITIONAL LATIN MASSES OR ANYBODY CONNECTED WITH THEM.
I have attended many traditional latin masses and most of the people who used go to such masses were actually kind hearted catholics.
Hard cold haters like you poster Ultraviolet are the very very opposite of everything catholicism stands for.

@Ultraviolet
Pharisees like yourself attach more importence to the outward manner in which people receive Holy Communion than whether they receive it at all.
You then adopt some spiritually superior manner that only your method is permissable.
The foul and anti Christian anti catholic so called Latin mass Society of England and Wales then refuse Holy Communion to people who desire to receive in the hand.
Go away the lot of you.
You are all haters of Christ and everything He stands for

@Ultraviolet

Oh dear .
Again time after time you fail to see the issue here.
Obviously you don’t know what the word accidentally means.
Then you confuse my secular description of feeding someone with the act of receiving communion.
Objectively it is the same thing in terms of the purely physical actions involved.
And fwiw I have received on the tongue where the Host was jammed into my mouth by a clumsy priest.
You want to live in some cloud cuckoo world of perfect priests who administer the sacraments without the slightest error.
Then you vomit bile at anybody who might point out that errors do occur when communion is administered orally.
Religious mania is clearly just part of your problem.

Well Christ Himself approved of St. Peter who was married.
It is also suggested that some of the other apostles were also married.
Indeed the ban on priests getting married was not in existence for around the first millennium of the catholic church’s history.
So yeah, maybe the AntiChrist approves of married clergy but so what when we know that Christ Himself selected a married man to be His first Vicar on Earth.

@Ultraviolet
It is obvious to the most obtuse but not to .you
indeed the sheer ignorance you spout would suggest that you have never received the Host on your tongue in your entire life.
When the priest holds the host in his fingers he must place it on the tongue of the communicant.
At all times his fingers are in very close proximity to the communicants tongue and lips.
Only people who have never received on the tongue like you would make the profoundly idiotic claim that the priests fingers never accidentally touch the communicants tongue or lip.
All Catholics who receive on the tongue know this can happen.
But you Ultraviolet are not a catholic and the levels of hatred and abuse you vomit at those who disagree with you support that conviction.

@Ultraviolet denies that saliva is transferred by clumsy priests when giving communion orally.
Then she admits it happens and claims that Christ will kill any viruses in that saliva.
Then she claims against all logic that Communion in the hand is also as unhygienic.
The poor wretch is all over the place and left without an argument resorts to the usual foul abuse of everybody who disagrees with her religious hysteria .

@Ultraviolet

There are indeed some clumsy priests whose fingers transfer saliva from other communicants when giving communion orally.
I have personally experienced this ugly phenomenon
Your view is that Christ in the Eucharist will kill any viruses in that saliva.
You then the seek to force that view on everybody.
I say why take the risk when it’s obviously safer to receive on the hand.
Many catholic bishops agree with me.
You are contemptuous of normal hygiene and health safety precautions.
This is clearly connected to your religious fanaticism which rejects all God given reason and logic.

The clown poster @Ultraviolet fails totally to understand that airborne respiratory viruses are airborne in tiny microscopic droplets of fluid.
The fluid resides in the oral and nasal cavities of persons suffering an infection they are,e expelled when that person coughs sneezes and sometimes even when they breath.
Anybody receiving communion on the tongue needs their head examined as the possibility of saliva transference from communicants to communicants via a clumsy priests fingers is high.
Communion in the hand is the most hygienic method.
Many bishops now understand this but sadly. It all.
Poster @Ultraviolet is fanatically opposed to communion in the hand and therefore must want everybody to be infected.