Franciszek: nie można zastąpić aktami „czci religijnej” prawdziwego nawrócenia

"Ojciec Święty upamiętnił pierwszą papieską Mszę odprawioną po włosku, a nie po łacinie. Dokładnie 50 lat od zainaugurowania przez Pawła VI nowych norm liturgicznych Soboru Watykańskiego II w tym samym rzymskim kościele Wszystkich Świętych Papież Franciszek sprawował uroczystą liturgię. W homilii przypomniał, że soborowa konstytucja Sacrosantum Concilium definiuje liturgię jako „pierwsze i niezastąpione źródło, z którego wierni czerpią prawdziwie chrześcijańskiego ducha”. Oznacza to, jak podkreślił Papież, potwierdzenie zasadniczej więzi łączącej życie ucznia Jezusa z kultem liturgicznym. Franciszek przypomniał, że Kościół wzywa do rozwijania autentycznego życia liturgicznego, tak by zaistniała harmonia między tym, co celebruje liturgia, a tym, co przeżywamy w naszej codziennej egzystencji. „Chodzi więc o to, byśmy naszym życiem wyrażali to, co otrzymaliśmy dzięki naszej wierze” – zaznaczył Franciszek.

„Uczeń Jezusa nie chodzi do kościoła jedynie po to, by wypełnić przykazanie, by czuć się w porządku wobec Boga, który potem nie powinien zbytnio «przeszkadzać». Panie Boże chodzę co niedzielę do kościoła, ale Ty nie mieszaj się do mego życia – to jest postawa wielu katolików – mówił Papież. - Uczeń Jezusa chodzi do kościoła po to, by spotkać Pana i znaleźć w Jego łasce działającej w sakramentach siłę do myślenia i działania zgodnie z Ewangelią. Nie możemy więc łudzić się, że wchodząc do domu Pańskiego «przykryjemy» modlitwami i pobożnymi praktykami zachowania sprzeczne z wymogami sprawiedliwości, uczciwości i miłości bliźniego. Nie możemy zastąpić aktami «czci religijnej» tego, co należy się bliźniemu, odwlekając prawdziwe nawrócenie. Kult, celebracje liturgiczne są szczególnym miejscem słuchania głosu Pana, który prowadzi drogami sprawiedliwości i chrześcijańskiej doskonałości. Chodzi o przejście drogi nawrócenia i pokuty, by usunąć z naszego życia śmiecie grzechu, tak jak to zrobił Jezus, oczyszczając świątynię z małostkowych działań”.

Odprawiając pierwszą publiczną Mszę po włosku Paweł VI powiedział w homilii, że z dniem 7 marca 1965 r. zostaje zainaugurowany nowy sposób modlitwy i sprawowania Eucharystii we wszystkich parafiach i kościołach świata. Dzięki wprowadzeniu języków lokalnych każde zdanie i każde słowo liturgii staje się odtąd zrozumiałe."

link: pl.radiovaticana.va/…/1127860

“Today in matters of religion people are much more ignorant then when the Mass was in Latin.”
The Future Has Not Been Flourishing: Michele Brambilla has commented the anniversary of the first Mass partially celebrated in Italian by Paul VI, in a less triumphant way. Quote: “Today in matters of religion people are much more ignorant then when the Mass was in Latin.” He quotes from the homily of Paul VI during his first Italian Mass: "This is a great event which one will remember as the beginning of a flourishing spiritual life.” Brambilla adds: “There were high hopes which have perhaps been disappointed: the future has not been flourishing.”

Pope: Mass in vernacular helps people understand God, live the faith
....
The pope said he hoped that commemorating the first papal Mass in the vernacular rather than Latin would remind people that the house of God is meant to be a source of spiritual strength, where they can hear his word and feel "not like foreigners but as brothers and sisters" who are united in their love for Christ.

▬

According to St John Eudes God permits bad priests as a sign that He is thoroughly angry with the sin of His people.

Bad priests are a sign of God’s anger
‘THE MOST EVIDENT MARK of God’s anger and the most terrible castigation He can inflict upon the world are manifested when He permits His people to fall into the hands of clerics’ who are priests more in name than in deed...."
More Of the Same: The appointment of ultra-liberal and homosexualist Robert McElroy as the new bishop of San Diego turned topsy-turvy the expectations of those who were hoping for some Church stability ....

US-Ultraliberaler bekommt Riesendiözese

USA. Franziskus hat den bisherigen Weihbischof Robert McElroy von San Francisco zum Bischof von San Diego ernannt. San Diego ist als Diözese doppelt so groß wie San Francisco. McElroay ist ein ausgesprochener Liberaler. Ende Januar stellt er sich gegen die Unauflöslichkeit der Ehe auf die Seite von Kardinal Kasper. Zudem verteidigt er die Abgabe der Kommunion an Abtreibungspolitiker.
Gloria Global am 4. März 2015

"AVANTI"

The Washing of the Feet by Michael Voris & Francis novelity

Joseph Ratzinger wrote in the preface to the book by Alcuin Reid “Lo sviluppo organico della liturgia,” Cantagalli, Siena, 2013:
“It seems very important to me that the Catechism, in mentioning the limits of the power of the supreme authority of the Church with regard to reform, should call back to mind what is the essence of primacy, as it is emphasized by Vatican Councils I and II: the pope is not an absolute monarch whose will is law, but rather the guardian of the ancient Tradition [one of the two sources of divine revelation – editor’s note], and the first guarantor of obedience. He cannot do whatever he wants, and precisely because of this he can oppose those who intend to do whatever they want. The law to which he must adhere is not that of acting ‘ad libitum,’ but obedience to the faith. Because of this, with regard to the liturgy, he has the task of a gardener and not that of an engineer who builds new machines and throws out the old ones. The ‘rite,’ meaning the form of celebration and prayer that matures in the faith and life of the Church, is a condensed form of the living Tradition, in which the sphere of the rite expresses the whole of its faith and prayer, making it possible at the same time to experience the communion among the generations, the communion among those who pray before us and after us. Thus the rite is like a gift that is given to the Church, a living form of ‘paradosis.'”

«The Horror! A Buenos Aires journalist describes Bergoglio:

Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and moral seem to have been irrelevant to him.

A sworn enemy of the Traditional Mass, he has only allowed imitations of it in the hands of declared enemies of the ancient liturgy. He has persecuted every single priest who made an effort to wear a cassock, preach with firmness, or that was simply interested in Summorum Pontificum.

Famous for his inconsistency (at times, for the unintelligibility of his addresses and homilies), accustomed to the use of coarse, demagogical, and ambiguous expressions, it cannot be said that his magisterium is heterodox, but rather non-existent for how confusing it is.

His entourage in the Buenos Aires Curia, with the exception of a few clerics, has not been characterized by the virtue of their actions. Several are under grave suspicion of moral misbehavior..»
Link

Double sacrilege against Eucharist by Bergoglio in Argentina.

Min 0:12 The Priest should say "The Body of Christ" Corpus Domini nostri Jesu+ Christi custodiat animam tuam in vitam æternam. Amen.

Eucharistic Sacrilege at Bergoglio Mass in Argentina
Eucharistic Sacrilege at Bergoglio Mass in Argentina.
Also Eucharistic Sacrilege at Francisl Mass - Brasil and Manila

Gloria.TV News on the 30th of October 2014

Does Anybody Know the Direction? About Francis Cardinal Marx said: "This pope knows exactly what he is doing, let no one doubt that. Francis wants us to move. His frequent use of the word avanti -- 'get moving' -- is ample proof of that.” Gloria.tv wonders whether the Pope believes that adultery and practiced homosexuality will move the Church forward.

The whole of the Mass is a sacrifice, not an instruction for the people. The Church should be explaining the mysteries and ceremonies of the Mass from the pulpit more frequently, teaching the Catechism, and explaining the Catholic religion. But as a matter of fact, the priests have not, and might as well be speaking Latin from the pulpit, for the people are living in ignorance of the Catholic faith. The use of Latin does not prevent this ignorance but it does add to the element of mystery; it is a dead language, not understood by the people. Latin conveys to the heart and mind of the people that what is going on upon the Altar is past comprehension; a mystery is being enacted. And if all services were conducted in the language of the country, persons of another country, not conversant with other languages, might be led to drop their religion altogether; an evil consequence. The use of a dead language, Latin, is a safeguard against many evils; for languages in daily use undergo a continual process of change.

In Domino

I am getting tired of commenting upon the asinine comments of Pope Francis. In so far as "forward" has a temporal meaning,the Pope's statement is inane and jingle-istic . Temporally we are in our being always going "forward", we do not move (oureoves) forward, it is what we are. Ah, then the Pope mesnt somethng else. Let me reflect. From the point of view of "moving" ourselves about, things have changed from the horse and buggy days of the early 19th Century to the train and car and airplane of the subsequent centuries including today. The 20th Century moved technologically forward as it left behind, i.e., used no more, the previous technology. In that sense, we moved ourselves technologically forward. We gave up the "old" for the "new", relative to technological needs.

Let us substitute "theological" (i.e., salvational/liturgical/pastoral) for "technological" and we find that "moving forward" means in analogy to technology that we (should) leave behind the "previous", viz., the past theology/liturgy or truth/prayerful practice features of the "previous" Catholic Church as NO longer relevant, metaphorically speaking, to the "spiritual" tranportation needs of today. Whether the Pope is intellectually sharp enough or not to recognize the implication of his "hip-hip-onward-Christian-movers" tirade, I know not. What he said, willy/nillly, is that the theological (truth and correlative ligurgical practice) tradition of the Catholic Church has become as passé (no longer valid re truth and practice) to today's Church as horse-and-buggy transportation is passé relative to modern 21st Century transportation, in the extreme "moving ourselves" even to other planets (one of those "surprises" of the Spirit). For an ever onward self-moving Church the past can and may not possess any valid or normative role and that means that Catholic "tradition" is, to use Pope Francis' word correctly, "wrong". I repeat, I interpret Pope Francis' propagandistically formulated huppla on "always going forward" and that going "back" is "wrong" to imply inexorably two conclusions. 1. Pope Francis holds that the liturgy expressed by the Latin Mass along with the cognitive judgments (truth claims) of its theology are passé, that is WRONG! 2. What then becomes for the Pope the truth/practice criterion for being "right" in the dynamics of "always going forward"? Negatively expressed: What is NOT a criterion for this dynamis is any truth and practice already present from the past that contradictions, frustrates or limits the DIRECTION of "always moving forward". Cardinal Newman in his theory of doctrinal development insisted that the "new" always preserves the "old", i.e., the "new" is not a break with the "old" such that the "old" now becomes "wrong", rather an unfolding of the "old" and hence a more fuller extension of the "old" into the "now" and into the "future". What is it that seems to be driving the Pope? He seems to desire to affirm (post)modernity and adjust any and all truths and practice (dressed up in the clothes of "pastoral care") to the exigencies of modernity. Am I wrong?

I would appreciate any evaluation of my interpretation of what Pope Francis, freed from the orgy of propaganstic rhetoric, really meant, even if he was not fully cognizance of what he really proclaimed. If my interpretation is correct, then I find it very hard to argue with Louie Verrecchio of Harvesting the Fruit of Vatican 2 (or a very similar title to his website), namely that Pope Francis is de facto a "material heretic". Please, someone, anyone, relieve me of my suspicions or confirm them.

Pope (the sailor of Peter's boat?) F speaks very openly: making a distinction between the "Church" and the "People of God". Which people had he in mind? And, not surprisingly, he obviously does not believe, what we have heard from God's own Word: (paenitemini et credite evangelio) Thus: RETURN instead of PROGRESS. But Popeye (the sailor– full of spinach insted of grace–) knows better: one cannot go back, let us go FORWARD, always forward on THIS path. Christ said I AM THE PATH . The Always Forward Path means thus something else: Broadway to hell.

“I do not think there are many among Bishops that will be saved, but many more that perish.”
St. John Chrysostom, Extract from St. John Chrysostom, Homily III on Acts 1:12.2

www.traditionalcatholicpriest.com/…/saints-say-that…

Más de lo mismo:
El nombramiento del ultra-liberal y homosexualista Robert McElroy como el nuevo obispo de San Diego volvió patas arriba las expectativas de aquellos que estaban esperando algo de estabilidad en la Iglesia después que el principiante papa Francisco tuvo la oportunidad de asentarse en su pontificado - de acuerdo con Dexter Duggan en thewandererpress.com. Y añade: “El nombramiento de enormes proporciones de Francisco del “progresista ” Blase Cupich el pasado mes de septiembre para dirigir la importante Arquidiócesis de Chicago anuciaba más de lo mismo.”

El Futuro No Ha estado floreciendo:
Michele Brambilla ha comentado de una manera menos triunfante sobre el aniversario de la primera misa celebrada parcialmente en italiano por Pablo VI. Cito: “Hoy en asuntos de religión las personas son mucho más ignorante que entonces cuando la misa era en latín." El Cita de la homilía de Pablo VI durante su primera misa italiano: “Este es un gran evento que se recordará como el comienzo de una vida espiritual floreciente Brambilla añade: “Habían grandes esperanzas que tal vez han sido decepcionadas: el futuro no ha estado floreciendo.”