@chris griffin I have seen the interview. Sister Amapola doesn't refer to anything that was discussed or revealed in her conversation with God the Father, the Holy Spirit, Jesus or His Mother (or, in rare cases, with saints). So isn't it a bit premature to conclude that abortion was never discussed? Sister said that the power of evil is very strong in society and in the Church, so it is even more likely that abortion is mentioned in the messages, although it probably won't be the central message. That is - as I understand it - the reconquering by God of all that Satan has taken and the way God is pointing out to be His collaborators in this battle.

@English Catholic I think you yourself are not very knowledgeable about the teachings of the Church. I am giving as an example a little quote from John Henry Newman (canonized) about the role of conscience. Conscience always remains authoritative even if it is not perfect.
"Conscience is subject to man's existence. The divine nature of the conscience does not mean that moral action according to conscience is always right. Conscience goes"through man" and is thus "broken" Conscience binds itself to the concrete living conditions of the human being. These circumstances include the relationships that man enters into. For this reason, moral action is not a direct consequence of conscience. Man must come to a judgment of conscience in his created-ness. Conscience is and remains authoritative, despite man's limitations. In his
definition, Newman strongly emphasizes that conscience is authoritative. After all, the conscience is nothing more or less than God himself. The connection of the conscience with man's concrete circumstances does not detract from this. The conscience remains the supreme authority. Human relationality should not be given primacy be given over conscience."
(J.H. Newman, “Letter to the Duke of Norfolk).

And I have never retracted my "claim" that I have a license in theology. I do indeed have a license in theology, though I'm not going to tell you which university I got it from. I want to avoid a pointless discussion about your "judgment" of this university, nor do I believe I am accountable to you. My responses to your comments are pure benevolence on my part but (like previous times) it does end now because it is becoming more and more pointless.

@English Catholic I am too simple to argue with you. I only know that God has given me the authority of my conscience. And while that conscience is not infallible, I still have a duty to follow it. Ultimately, God judges consciences. And my conscience says that the messages of the missionofdivinemercy are credible. You have the right to a different opinion, but you do not have the right to deny others their conscience.

@English Catholic well, I hope the church is not going to approve these messages because everything that the church approves these days (blessing of gay couples, communion for adulterers, worship of pagan idols like pachamama, change of the teachings of the church on capital punishment and many other things) is definitely not from God. So better that the bishop and "Rome" say nothing. The sheep do recognize the voice of the Shepherd themselves (and they don't recognize His voice in the statement of the local ordinary, who has more enormities on his conscience in persecuting simple believers...).