@Mathathias Maccabeus you're being disingenuous. I provided you with the relevant citation in an earlier attempt to stop you from being a Satanist. And even so, he doesn't believe in hell by his actions and other statements (like the communion of saints rubbish). You keep telling me to read, but I think you're one of the most ignorant (intentionally maybe) Catholics around. I feel sorrier and sorrier for you with each post you make.

So the antipope says there is no hell, and his PR team in the Vatican says that's false. Bergoglio said nothing. He just decided to plant that seed of confusion. He does it all the time. He goes to his communist friends, says what he believes, then gets an official denial.

And yet we know he doesn't believe in hell because he says things like in Amoris that no one suffers eternal damnation, and then recently that awful human beings, sinners and apostates are in the communion of saints.

@Mathathias Maccabeus is defending the indefensible. Because he's totally Cathlic.

Keep in mind, Bergoglio is not a Catholic. He doesn't believe in hell. He probably doesn't believe in Heaven, either.

His entire reason for being here is to deceive and confuse and DESTROY. Look at what he's done to @Mathathias Maccabeus and @Ultraviolet .

Hold to Catholic faith.

@Mathathias Maccabeus someday you'll need to write a post explaining how a person loving the papacy and the Catholic church so much that he hates to see an antipope destroy it is "Lutheran". And then please ask why a Lutheran would make such an argument based on Catholic dogma and Canon Law. Or ask why a Lutheran would want Bergoglio to step down, considering Bergie's love of Luther.

Take some time off. Ponder. Smoke some cigars. Ask people in your larping guild. Whatever.

@Mathathias Maccabeus “ Indeed, anytime any speaks something true, it's "infallible". ” isn't an inability to understand or write English, though. It's just a mistake which doesn't actually change the meaning of the sentence. Indeed, most people know what "person" was supposed to be there. But I missed it.

But reading something and then completely inverting the meaning is a comprehension problem.

Also, I'm not so concerned with spelling or common errors that everyone makes. Including you. That's a clown move, a troll 101 move. Errors of comprehension , such as your in regards to infallibility, heresy, and the papacy, which results in your zealous defense of a man who worships demons, is the issue.

Also, we judge daily. We live our lives according to Christian ethics and dogma. Do I want to accept a demon worshipping, Jesus hating sodomite as pope? No. Do I have to. NO.

Your entire existence is based on defending a man who is ruining the same Church you pretend to love.

Tough break, Bergoglian.

@Dr Bobus nobody says "God protects the 'supernaturality' of popes". Learn English better. @Mathathias Maccabeus I didn't say he was say he was speaking infallibly. Indeed, anytime any speaks something true, it's "infallible". So if this demon spouted something infallible, it doesn't take away the fact that he's a demon. Even Satan agrees that God is real.

Right here, your holiness is being his usual heretical self. Go smoke your cigar and leave big thinking to others.

I didn't imply people were shocked. I said people were shocked. Maybe you weren't shocked. In that case, even more shame on you for defending an antipope. But then, you've defended his recent "not a dictate" dictate which the bishops are dutifully following, the same bishops that conveniently won't declare him an antipope and a heretic. You should write PR for Bergoglio. You seem to share the same clever insincerity and duplicity. And you're just as Catholic!

Update 2: @Mathathias Maccabeus Bergoglio has said and demonstrated everything I said. I've demonstrated it with links, with the formal delict of heresy, and with common sense using the Catholic dogma we were taught as children.

Your only defense of Bergoglio is that I'm a Protestant/Satanist, I "lie", and you say I have no right to judge the pope. But of course, I do. I have a right to defend Catholic dogma, something every Catholic has the right to do. When anyone, including Bergoglio, goes against it, I call him or her on it.

What is clear for all to see is how you care more about defending Bergoglio than defending Jesus Christ.

Would Jesus Christ approve of worshipping a demon from South America? Mmm, probably not. But here we are: so called Catholics defending Satanic worship.

And that time he had a bust of Luther in the Vatican? LUTHER?

This @Mathathias Maccabeus character and his equally pedantic and childish cohort claim that they're against this, but their most passionate and hate filled vitriol on this site is directed to anyone who has a problem with his heretical actions.

That's a tell. These minions care more about the unity of the Church, even if that church is the anti-Church, than they do about it actually being Catholic.

You guys are almost completely in the hands of the devil. I implore you simply to examine your consciences.