THE SSPX AND CANCELLED PRIESTS CAN DEMAND RECOGNITION SINCE VATICAN COUNCIL II NOW SUPPORTS THE CONSERVATIVES
28.10.2025
THE SSPX AND CANCELLED PRIESTS CAN DEMAND RECOGNITION SINCE VATICAN COUNCIL II NOW SUPPORTS THE CONSERVATIVES : 100 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED )
100. Can the SSPX and Cancelled Priests demand canonical recognition?
Yes. Since Vatican Council II is no more an issue for the conservatives. The Council can only be interpreted rationally. This is the only ethical option available. It is the liberals who are in schism i.e. Cardinals Farrell, Cupich, Fernandez and Roche. The Council is no more a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. The Catechism of Pope John Paul II is in harmony with all the catechisms interpreted rationally.
99. What about Cardinal Cupich’s new appointment?
He does not accept Vatican Council II. He is a modernist. He does not interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. This is public schism. It is a type of apostasy. He is a modernist. Why must I …More
CARDINAL CUPICH DOES NOT ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II. HE DOES NOT INTERPRET THE CREEDS RATIONALLY. THIS IS SCHISM
28.10.2025
CARDINAL CUPICH DOES NOT ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II. HE DOES NOT INTERPRET THE CREEDS RATIONALLY. THIS IS SCHISM : 99 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
99. What about Cardinal Cupich’s new appointment?
He does not accept Vatican Council II. He is a modernist. He does not interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. This is public schism. It is a type of apostasy. He is a modernist. Why must I attend his Holy Mass in Rome when he does not end this scandal. - Lionel Andrades
27.10.2025
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYITE EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION : 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
If there is a table before me and I see a chair then my observation is wrong. If I mistake a window for a door then this is an error of observation. It is an objective mistake. This is not philosophy or theology. It is a physically observable mistake. It is a wrong way of physically looking at something. So …More
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYIT EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION.
27.10.2025
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYITE EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION : 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
If there is a table before me and I see a chair then my observation is wrong. If I mistake a window for a door then this is an error of observation. It is an objective mistake. This is not philosophy or theology. It is a physically observable mistake. It is a wrong way of physically looking at something. So if 10 people see a table and the 11th sees a chair instead, then his reality is different. It is an empirical mistake. It is a mistake in space and time.
In general people do not make this mistake. They call a chair a chair and a table a table. Observation is normal.
But in 1949 a Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston was issued from Rome. It wrongly suggested that we humans can see someone saved with the baptism of desire. But today we know that we cannot physically see …More
Yes only Vatican Council II rational can be affirmed rationally.
Vatican II is irrational so cannot be affirmed rationally.
THE INSTITUTE FOR ECUMENICAL STUDIES AT THE ANGELICUM IN ROME INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
25.10.2025
THE INSTITUTE FOR ECUMENICAL STUDIES AT THE ANGELICUM IN ROME INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY ? : 97 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
97. The Institute for Ecumenical Studies in Rome at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally?
The Institute for Ecumenical Studies at the Angelicam is based upon irrational and heretical, Vatican Council II irrational instead of Vatican Council II rational. The Council interpreted rationally is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), of the Council of Florence 1442.The Institute was originally founded by a Jewish Left rabbi who interpreted the Council liberally and politically.
The Dominican priest-professors know that Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally. But they continue with the error to avoid the Anti Semitic charge and so not be able to teach anymore.
There is big money being put into the Catholic Church to prop …More
With Vatican Council II irrational liberal bishops are on the offensive but with the Council rational they are on the defensive
25.10.2025
With Vatican Council II irrational liberal bishops are on the offensive but with the Council rational they are on the defensive: 96 Questions and Answers ( Updated)
96. With Vatican Council II irrational bishops are on the offensive and with Vatican Council II rational they are on the defensive?
If you get the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano theology out of the way sparks would fly in the dioceses. Cardinal Arthur Roche could no more put down the Traditional Latin Mass. The TLM could not be closed in the name of the Lefebvre’s Vatican Council II. It is the New Theology of the bisbhops, cardinals and the pope.
Now the New Theology has been identified .We simply avoid it.
Orthodoxy dominates in Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Morally, there is no other choice for Cardinal Roche.
With Vatican Council II irrational the New Missal is schismatic.
With Vatican Council II rational, the Council is aligned with the Roman Missal, and Vatican Council II, liberal and the bishop …More
The diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II
24.10.2025
THE BISHOP MUST USE THE L.A INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IN CHARLOTTE : 95 QUESTIONS ANS ANSWERS (UPDATED)
95. The diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
Yes the diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Latin Mass groups in Charlotte must continue to affirm Tradition of the Roman Missal but they must avoid the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the bishop and Lefebvre-Kwasniewski and Vigano.
Without this common interpretation the bishop cannot demand an end of the Latin Mass. The bishop will know that the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal is contradicted by Vatican Council II as interpreted by Lefebvre and the sedevacantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas.
Canonically and legally to remain a bishop, he must affirm Vatican Council II rationally like me and also affirm the ecclesiology of …More
MUSLIM CLERICS THROUGH THE FSCIRE ISLAMIC CENTER IN PALERMO, ITALY CALL FOR CONVERSION TO ISLAM
22.10.2025
MUSLIM CLERICS THROUGH THE FSCIRE ISLAMIC CENTER IN PALERMO, ITALY CALL FOR CONVERSION TO ISLAM : 97 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
94. Muslim imams and professors at European secular and pontifical universities?
Bishop Hermann Glettler of Innsbruck, Austria, rejoices in the training of Muslim Imams at the Catholic university, says the head line on Gloria TV. Muslims are allowed to study at the pontifical universities. They also can study philosophy and theology and then teach it to Catholics and others The condition is that they must interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents irrationally. In this way they produce a fake break with Catholic Tradition, which is approved by the political-left.
On the other hand I am not allowed to study philosophy or theology at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas and the Pontifical Regina Apostolorum University, Rome. I affirm Vatican Council II, rational which is in harmony with the traditional strict interpretation of …More
Deuteronomy 30, 17-18
"But if your heart strays, if you refuse to listen, if you let yourself be drawn into
worshiping other gods and serving them, I tell you today, you will most certainly
perish".
Qual è l'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II? Perché è diversa?
L'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II
1.Qual è l'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II?
È un modo diverso di leggere LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, ecc., del Concilio Vaticano II.
2.Perché è diversa?
Considera LG 8, 14, 15, 16, ecc., come casi ipotetici. Si riferiscono a persone invisibili nel periodo 1965-2023. Pertanto, non sono esempi oggettivi di salvezza nei tempi attuali e non rappresentano eccezioni all'ecclesiocentrismo passato della Chiesa. Non contraddicono il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus del Concilio di Firenze (1442) e del Quarto Concilio Lateranense (1215). Non possiamo vedere nessuno salvato in comunione imperfetta con la Chiesa (UR 3) o dove la Chiesa cattolica sussiste al di fuori dei suoi confini visibili (LG 8). Se qualcuno fosse salvato al di fuori della Chiesa, ciò sarebbe noto solo a Dio.
3.E allora? Perché è importante?
Attualmente, i papi, i cardinali e i vescovi interpretano il Concilio Vaticano II come …More
Questi ragazzi nella foto, tutti uomini in maggior parte , ce li ritroveremo al 90 % a lavorare nei nostri campi a fare un duro lavoro che nessun italiano vuole oramai piu fare. Chi con permesso regolare e chi senza permesso regolare . Sena luce , senza acqua , in masserie fatiscenti ,denutriti ,ammalati . Li vedi lavorare in mezzo alle pezze dal mattino alle 7,00 alla sera alle 16,00 per un pezzo di pane come schiavi ,sotto il sole e sotto il freddo. In maggioranza sono sposati e il loro salario va a finire tutto alle loro famiglie in africa dove matengono famiglie intere e fanno studiare i loro figli . I cattolici della domencica e della" tradizione "( alla meloni e salvini ) li considerano delinquenti allineandosi a quei quattro gay direttori dei nostri telegiornali . Oggi senza questi ragazzi non ci sarebbe agricoltura in italia e non ci sarebbero esportazioni .... e non avranno mai la pensione pur se verranno vesarati i contributi ...... Derubati fino all ultimo ! I neri in particolare …More
(dal num. 2): "Se qualcuno fosse salvato al di fuori della Chiesa, ciò sarebbe noto solo a Dio".
----------
(dal num. 3): "Attualmente, i papi, i cardinali e i vescovi interpretano il Concilio Vaticano II come una rottura con la Tradizione. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, ecc., sono considerati eccezioni al dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Il Credo di Atanasio e il Sillabo degli Errori di Papa Pio IX risultano obsoleti per loro. Implicano che questi passaggi siano esempi oggettivi di salvezza nei tempi attuali, non casi invisibili. Questo è irrazionale".
Il neretto è mio
-----------
(dal num. 4): "La Chiesa torna alla fede e alla morale tradizionali basate sulla salvezza esclusiva nella Chiesa cattolica, come era apostolico. È un ritorno ai Padri della Chiesa e ai missionari del XVI secolo.
I cattolici possono nuovamente proclamare il Regno Sociale di Cristo Re in tutta la politica, poiché il Concilio Vaticano II è in armonia con la Tradizione. È importante che …More
What is the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ? Why is it different it is being asked.
What is the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
1. What is the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
It is a different way of looking at LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II.
2.Why is it different?
It sees LG 8,14, 15,16 etc as being only hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible people in 1965-2023. So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times . They are not exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. They do not contradict the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
We cannot see any one saved in imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3) or where the Catholic Church subsists outside its visible boundaries (LG 8). If any one was saved outside the Church it could only be known to God.
3.So what ? Why is this important ?
Presently the popes, cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. LG 8, …More
MUSLIMS WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY ONLY ARE ALLOWED TO STUDY AT CATHOLIC PONTIIFICAL UNIVERSITIES : 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
21.10.2025
MUSLIMS WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY ONLY ARE ALLOWED TO STUDY AT CATHOLIC PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITIES : 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
94. Muslim imams and professors at European secular and pontifical universities?
Bishop Hermann Glettler of Innsbruck, Austria, rejoices in the training of Muslim Imams at the Catholic university, says the head line on Gloria TV. Muslims are allowed to study at the pontifical universities. They also can study philosophy and theology and then teach it to Catholics and others The condition is that they must interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents irrationally. In this way they produce a fake break with Catholic Tradition, which is approved by the political-left.
On the other hand I am not allowed to study philosophy or theology at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas and the Pontifical Regina Apostolorum University, Rome. I affirm Vatican Council II, rational which is in harmony with the traditional strict …More
CARDINAL VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM WITH THE FAKE INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II : 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
21.10.2025
CARDINAL VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM WITH THE FAKE INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II : 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
93. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez is in schism with the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
Yes. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez is in public schism when he does not accept Vatican Council II. The Council can only be interpreted rationally.
‘The red is not an exception for the blue’ for me but for him ‘the red is an exception for the blue’. So he does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), as I do. He is a Cushingite (invisible people are visible in 2025) and I am a Feeneyite (invisible cases are just invisible in the present times).
Fernandez declared Archbishop Vigano to be in schism since Vigano would not accept Vatican Council II interpreted ir-rationally.So the Council emerges as a break with Tradition.
But Fernandez does not affirm a Vatican Council II which has a continuity with Tradition. He is in schism …More
OBLIGATION FOR CARDINALS GRECH, AND HOLLERICH AND BISHOPS BATZING AND BODE TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II : CANONICAL ISSUE
20.10.2025
OBLIGATION FOR CARDINALS GRECH, AND HOLLERICH AND BISHOPS BATZING AND BODE TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II : CANONICAL ISSUE : 92 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
This is the discovery …More
LA CHIESA CATTOLICA È SEMPRE STATA FEENEYITA MA IL NUOVO MESSALE DI PAPA PAOLO VI È CUSHINGITA
19.10.2025
LA CHIESA CATTOLICA È SEMPRE STATA FEENEYITA MA IL NUOVO MESSALE DI PAPA PAOLO VI È CUSHINGITA : 91 DOMANDE E RISPOSTE (AGGIORNATO)
1.Qual è la scoperta?
La scoperta è che il Concilio Vaticano II è ecclesiocentrico e ha una continuità con il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Concilio di Firenze 1442), il Credo di Sant’Atanasio e il resto della Tradizione. C’è continuità con tutti i catechismi su “fuori dalla Chiesa non c’è salvezza”.
2.Puoi essere specifico?
Ad Gentes 7 dice che tutti hanno bisogno di fede e battesimo per la salvezza. Tutti. AG 7 è incluso nel Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica sotto il titolo “Fuori dalla Chiesa non c’è salvezza” (846). Nel frattempo, LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 ecc. nel Concilio Vaticano II si riferiscono a casi invisibili nel 2025. Sono sempre ipotetici.
Quindi non sono esempi oggettivi di salvezza nei tempi presenti. Non sono eccezioni esplicite per AG 7 o il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Questa è la scoperta. …More
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS ALWAYS BEEN FEENEYITE BUT THE NEW MISSAL OF POPE PAUL VI IS CUSHINGITE
19.10.2025
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS ALWAYS BEEN FEENEYITE BUT THE NEW MISSAL OF POPE PAUL VI IS CUSHINGITE : 91 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
This is the discovery. LG 16 refers to an …More
PADRI MINIMI ALLA BASILICA DI SANT'ANDREA DELLE FRATTE, ROMA, DEVONO ESSERE AUTORIZZATI A INTERPRETARE IL CONCILIO VATICANO II IN ARMONIA CON L'ECCLESIOLOGIA DI ALFONSO RATISBONNE
16.10.2025
I
PADRI MINIMI ALLA BASILICA DI SANT'ANDREA DELLE FRATTE, ROMA, DEVONO ESSERE AUTORIZZATI A INTERPRETARE IL CONCILIO VATICANO II IN ARMONIA CON L'ECCLESIOLOGIA DI ALFONSO RATISBONNE: 90 DOMANDE E RISPOSTE (AGGIORNATO)
Qual è la scoperta?
La scoperta è che il Concilio Vaticano II è ecclesiocentrico e ha continuità con il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Concilio di Firenze 1442), il Credo di Sant'Atanasio e il resto della Tradizione. C'è continuità con tutti i catechismi su "fuori dalla Chiesa non c'è salvezza".
Puoi essere più specifico?
Ad Gentes 7 afferma che tutti hanno bisogno di fede e battesimo per la salvezza. Tutti. AG 7 è incluso nel Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica sotto il titolo "Fuori dalla Chiesa non c'è salvezza" (846). Nel frattempo, LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 ecc. nel Concilio Vaticano II si riferiscono a casi invisibili nel 2025. Sono sempre ipotetici.
Quindi non sono esempi oggettivi di salvezza nei tempi presenti. Non sono eccezioni …More
Potremmo avere qualche minima notizia su Lionel Leslie Andrades? essenzialmente, se è un laico o un Ministro Ordinato?
Nel frattempo, vorrei ringraziarlo per il suo lavoro
SCOPERTA RIVOLUZIONARIA. "IL ROSSO NON FA ECCEZIONE PER IL BLU" NEL CONCILIO VATICANO II, CATECHISMO DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA, DOMINUS IESUS, 1949 LOHO…: 73 DOMANDE E RISPOSTE (AGGIORNATO)
SCOPERTA RIVOLUZIONARIA. "IL ROSSO NON FA …
I PADRI MINIMI ALLA BASILICA DI SANT'ANDREA DELLE FRATTE, ROMA, DEVONO ESSERE AUTORIZZATI A INTERPRETARE IL CONCILIO VATICANO II IN ARMONIA CON L'ECCLESIOLOGIA DI ALFONSO RATISBONNE: 90 DOMANDE E RISPOSTE (AGGIORNATO)
x.com/i/grok?conversation=1979545078751248779
THE MINIM FATHERS AT THE BASILICA OF SANT ANDREA DELLE FRATTE , ROME MUST BE ALLOWED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF ALPHONSE RATISBONNE : 90 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
16.10.2025
THE MINIM FATHERS AT THE BASILICA OF SANT ANDREA DELLE FRATTE , ROME MUST BE ALLOWED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF ALPHONSE RATISBONNE : 90 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma …More
PRESIDENT TRUMP AND BRIAN BURCH MUST ASK THE USCCB TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II NON POLITICALLY. CATHOLICS DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THE DECEPTION : 89 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
15.10.2025
PRESIDENT TRUMP AND BRIAN BURCH MUST ASK THE USCCB TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II NON POLITICALLY. CATHOLICS DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THE DECEPTION : 89 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). …More
I enjoy reading your content! I am glad you have cleared up the misconception regarding V2 in light of Tradition and Father Feeny's position! Excellent!
THE THOMAS MORE COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE, USA INTERPRET THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS IRRATIONALLY AND THE STUDENTS DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS
14.10.2025
THE THOMAS MORE COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE, USA INTERPRET THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS IRRATIONALLY AND THE STUDENTS DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS : 88 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam …More
Pretty awesome!
EDWARD SCHAEFER AND THE COLLEGIUM ARE MODERNIST WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL. THEIR OATH AGAINST MODERNISM IS MEANINGLESS
13.10.2025
EDWARD SCHAEFER AND THE COLLEGIUM ARE MODERNIST WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL. THEIR OATH AGAINST MODERNISM IS MEANINGLESS : 87 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
This is the …More
POPE LEO, THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS AND TRADITIONALIST BISHOPS CONFUSED IMPLICIT BAPTISM OF DESIRE AS BEING EXPLICIT EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EENS : 77 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
12.10.2025
POPE LEO, THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS AND TRADITIONALIST BISHOPS CONFUSED IMPLICIT BAPTISM OF DESIRE AS BEING EXPLICIT EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EENS : 77 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
1. What is the discovery?
The discovery is that Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and has a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. There is continuity with all the catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.
2. Could you be specific?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. AG 7 is included in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846). Meanwhile LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2025. They are always hypothetical.
So they are not objective examples of salvation in the present times. They are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (…More