PiusX General Superior Confuses Right With Crime
One [false] reason why the Society of PiusX is not against the Covid-"vaccines" is the heterogenous anti-vaccine alliance, the General Superior, Father Pagliarani, explained in a December 11 talk (…More
One [false] reason why the Society of PiusX is not against the Covid-"vaccines" is the heterogenous anti-vaccine alliance, the General Superior, Father Pagliarani, explained in a December 11 talk (FSSPX.news, January 5).
This alliance includes Catholics and people from all political spectrums, including anarchists or ecologists. According to Pagliarani, these people are against the vaccine "in the name of individual freedom, human dignity, human rights."
He reduces this to the slogan "With my body I do whatever I want" and equates it with the abortion cry "My belly belongs to me,” thus indiscriminately comparing a human right to a crime as if children were part of their mothers' "belly."
Vaccine critics follow the same principles like fighters for human rights or freedom, Pagliarani believes, "We find again the same principles of the New Order started 300 years ago in the name of human rights, human dignity.”
These conclusions are preposterous. Criticism on Covid vaccines are not about …More
This alliance includes Catholics and people from all political spectrums, including anarchists or ecologists. According to Pagliarani, these people are against the vaccine "in the name of individual freedom, human dignity, human rights."
He reduces this to the slogan "With my body I do whatever I want" and equates it with the abortion cry "My belly belongs to me,” thus indiscriminately comparing a human right to a crime as if children were part of their mothers' "belly."
Vaccine critics follow the same principles like fighters for human rights or freedom, Pagliarani believes, "We find again the same principles of the New Order started 300 years ago in the name of human rights, human dignity.”
These conclusions are preposterous. Criticism on Covid vaccines are not about …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
So true. If he’s worried to look like a leftist for standing with anti-vaxxers, what does he look like for standing with the other side?
@John A Cassani
He says it in his full speech. However, IMHO, putting aside the abortion question (which in my humble opinion has something to do with a question: is economical/health-care cannibalism sinful?), the main fallacy is:
if Fr.Pagliarani steps aside and distances from the medical question then he is unable to say that it is ( morally ) legitimate to take the vaxx in any case - he is unable …More
@John A Cassani
He says it in his full speech. However, IMHO, putting aside the abortion question (which in my humble opinion has something to do with a question: is economical/health-care cannibalism sinful?), the main fallacy is:
if Fr.Pagliarani steps aside and distances from the medical question then he is unable to say that it is ( morally ) legitimate to take the vaxx in any case - he is unable to judge it.
For example, a father of the family may be afraid of losing his job but losing the job is the lesser evil than losing ability to work as a possible side effect of untested experimental gene therapy.
He says it in his full speech. However, IMHO, putting aside the abortion question (which in my humble opinion has something to do with a question: is economical/health-care cannibalism sinful?), the main fallacy is:
if Fr.Pagliarani steps aside and distances from the medical question then he is unable to say that it is ( morally ) legitimate to take the vaxx in any case - he is unable to judge it.
For example, a father of the family may be afraid of losing his job but losing the job is the lesser evil than losing ability to work as a possible side effect of untested experimental gene therapy.
@John A Cassani
In other words you cannot determine whether it is legitimate to use a thing when you don't know what it is. It would be like saying: it is morally legitimate to take arsenic when you have to travel to earn money not caring and not determining what arsenic really is.
In other words you cannot determine whether it is legitimate to use a thing when you don't know what it is. It would be like saying: it is morally legitimate to take arsenic when you have to travel to earn money not caring and not determining what arsenic really is.
Laura Yunque
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
He is outrageously wrong here.
"Criticism on Covid vaccines are not about slogans but about doubting the morality, safety, and efficacy of the covid "vaccines." Further, the Nuremberg Code - a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation - establish the truism that personal consent is absolutely essential for medical experiments."
---
SSPX seems to know the above:
Religious exemptions for Traditional Catholics …More
"Criticism on Covid vaccines are not about slogans but about doubting the morality, safety, and efficacy of the covid "vaccines." Further, the Nuremberg Code - a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation - establish the truism that personal consent is absolutely essential for medical experiments."
---
SSPX seems to know the above:
Religious exemptions for Traditional Catholics explained to employers
---
SSPX seems to know the above:
Religious exemptions for Traditional Catholics explained to employers
Jeffrey Ade
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bingo!
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
For someone who, presumably, is well trained in logic, to commit the genetic fallacy, as he does here, is very sad. Catholics oppose the jabs because they are unsafe, and because they are derived from immoral means, not because we wish to signify adherence to the French Revolution.
The full speech is here: The Superior General of the SSPX Clarifies the Vaccine Debate
De Profundis
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Worldometer published a report on December 31 showing that abortion was the leading cause of death worldwide in 2021 with 42.6 million deaths. This elevates abortion to the level of genocide.