Francis: Our Lady Was “Not Co-Redemtrix” – Although Pius X, Pius XI, John Paul II Said It
Our Lady “never introduced herself as a co-redeemer, rather as a disciple,” Francis said in his December 12 homily for Our Lady of Guadalupe, although Our Lady never introduced herself as a "disciple." …More
Our Lady “never introduced herself as a co-redeemer, rather as a disciple,” Francis said in his December 12 homily for Our Lady of Guadalupe, although Our Lady never introduced herself as a "disciple."
He vilified introducing new Marian titles and dogmas a “foolishness.” The Church existing before Francis introduced hundreds of Marian titles (e.g. in Marian litanies) and proclaimed four Marian dogmas (Mother of God, Virginity, Immaculate Conception, Assumption).
Attempts to proclaim the fifth Marian dogma of the Co-Reedemer were strong throughout the 20th century but Pius XII vetoed them although this title has been used and discussed since the 15th century.
Pius X invoked it in a prayer which is part of an official Church document (AAS [6] 1914, 108). The title was also used by Pius XI and John Paul II.
#newsOkskxiyscy
He vilified introducing new Marian titles and dogmas a “foolishness.” The Church existing before Francis introduced hundreds of Marian titles (e.g. in Marian litanies) and proclaimed four Marian dogmas (Mother of God, Virginity, Immaculate Conception, Assumption).
Attempts to proclaim the fifth Marian dogma of the Co-Reedemer were strong throughout the 20th century but Pius XII vetoed them although this title has been used and discussed since the 15th century.
Pius X invoked it in a prayer which is part of an official Church document (AAS [6] 1914, 108). The title was also used by Pius XI and John Paul II.
#newsOkskxiyscy
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
en.news and 2 more users link to this post
Libor Halik
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bergoglio (Francis) is the biggest heretik.
Libor Halik
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
“He vilified introducing new Marian titles and dogmas a “foolishness.””
“Vilified” is much too strong. And he has a point: the Church is not about the BVM, after all. The religion is called Christ-ianity for a reason - not Marianity.
He deserves credit for introducing new Marian feasts:
www.ncregister.com
cruxnow.comMore
“He vilified introducing new Marian titles and dogmas a “foolishness.””
“Vilified” is much too strong. And he has a point: the Church is not about the BVM, after all. The religion is called Christ-ianity for a reason - not Marianity.
He deserves credit for introducing new Marian feasts:
www.ncregister.com
cruxnow.com
“Vilified” is much too strong. And he has a point: the Church is not about the BVM, after all. The religion is called Christ-ianity for a reason - not Marianity.
He deserves credit for introducing new Marian feasts:
www.ncregister.com
cruxnow.com
DEFENSA DE LA FE
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
GTVisrockin
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Did we expect any different from this nut?
johnandannette
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I believe I know who IS a fool.
Jungerheld
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Here is an excellent point and one that shines the light on Francis'... "ways": Our Lady “never introduced herself as a co-redeemer, rather as a disciple,” Francis said in his December 12 homily for Our Lady of Guadalupe, although Our Lady never introduced herself as a "disciple."
prince0357
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
It would be better if Bergoglio aka Franziskus pp hold his mouth shut (NOT VERY POLITE FROM MY SIDE BUT POLITICAL INCORRECT RIGHT) and not serving permanently his PSEUDOLOGORRHEA ET ECHOLALIA PHANTASTICA.
SI TACUISSES PHILOSOPHUS MANSISSES!
SI TACUISSES PHILOSOPHUS MANSISSES!
O Maoleoin
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Should we be surprised.