Jewish as in Christian. The people who call themselves Jews today are not Jews since Judaism ended over 2000 years ago! You're mistaking our Church with an evil mafia of genocidal racial supremacist antichrist who do everything in their power to destroy Christianity. They are not the same people and never were. The only solution for that antichrist mafia is to reject jewry and accept the Catholic faith.

@frawley It's not a race or ethnicity anymore. They are mix of people. They spread across the world for thousands of years mixing with other nations. Most of them today are descendants of the pagan Khazarian Empire that converted to talmudic jewry in the 9th century. These Khazars spread out to the rest of Europe after their empire fell.
Benjamin H. Freedman speech (UNEDITED VERSION!) 1961
Judaism, plenipotentiary, subversion, world domination

No, Pattfm. The ideological war against anti-Semites like you and Matty and inevitably Elbow when he comes rushing to the defense of his fellow Jew-haters. Matty, in another stunning example of sloppy reasoning, commits two logical fallacies.

1.) a fallacious appeal to authority.
A businessman isn't a expert on anthropology, even if he's ethnically Jewish

2.) a fallacy of incomplete evidence aka "cherry-picking".
Matty won't, for obvious reasons, cite Jewish authors who contradict him or his source.

In an equally embarrassing display of sloppy scholarship, Matty ignored the fact Freedman discredits himself as a reputable, i.e. unbiased source. Freedman despised Judaism, even to the extent of turning into a Holocaust denier and financial backer of other anti-Semites.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman

In this case an ethnically Jewish man, hated followers of the Jewish religion.

The Nazis, however, didn't make the distinction Freedman chose to. To the Nazis, an ethnic Jew who converted to Catholicism was just as "guilty" of being ethnically Jewish as a religious Jew. The SS would have thrown a Catholic convert like Freedman into the same boxcar they did with Catholic nun (and later saint) Edith Stein.

By targeting a Christian of Jewish ethnicity, they further disprove Matty's rather asinine claim "It's not a race or ethnicity anymore." Stein was targeted because she was ethnically Jewish, specifically an ethnic Jew who converted to Catholicism, much like Benjamin Freedman did himself.

More numerous, not to mention infinitely more credible sources, do confirm Jews are a race/ ethnicity in addition to being a religion.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews
www.britannica.com/topic/Jew-people
www.pewforum.org/…/sidebar-who-is-…
www.psychologytoday.com/…/what-are-jews

@Ultraviolet “@Ultraviolet “Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son.
Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son, hath the Father also.”
(1John)
All who say they are Jews today are liars, they are antiChrists. They are therefore sons of satan, enemies of Almighty God.
You false Jew shills are tenacious.

Since you seem to be re-posting the same argumetns and your " I don't want to be contacted" nonsense only muddles things ups, I'll repost this here.

First, it's 1 John 2:22. Get your Scripture straight when you're trying to "Bible-thump" @Joseph a' Christian

Second, in the passage, Jesus was using the term "liar" referring only in cases of those who deny his Divinity.

"Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father and the Son."

Christ said nothing about whether or not non-Christian were universally liars in all things.

Scripture, in fact, shows Jesus disproved your interpretation in His dealings with a very notable non-Christian, Pontius Pilate. As we read in John 18:37

"Pilate therefore said to him: Art thou a king then? Jesus answered: Thou sayest that I am a king. For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth. Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice."

Notice what Christ says: "Thou sayest that I am a king. For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth."

Christ is confirming Pilate's assessment. Therefore Pilate was speaking the truth which, if your interpretation of 1 John 2:22 were correct, he should be incapable of doing.

Pilate, a non-Christian, spoke the truth. Your claim fails.

What you're doing is a common fallacy among many species of bigots, not just anti-Semites: it's a fallacy of composition. i.e. if something is true about one part, then it must be true about all parts.

Denying the divinity of Christ makes a person a liar on that subject. It does not make them a liar about everything. That was probably a better answer than an idiot like you deserved.

"You false Jew shills are tenacious."

That's you bearing false witness against your neighbor, Joe-Joe. Twice in one sentence. Matty does the same thing when he's losing.

You deliberately misread scripture to justify your anti-Semitism and then you accuse me of "twisted deceit." That's rich, @Joseph a' Christian . :D

There's nothing deceitful about what I've said because Scripture does not say what idiots like you and Matty want it to. It never does and it never will.

The best your kind can ever do is what you did here: misapply it to support a logical fallacy.

...and your first comment doesn't "stand" at all. It's been knocked down by a counter-example involving no one less than the Son of God Himself.