It's indisputable: Pope Paul VI was the worst nightmare that the Church has ever experienced in living memory. He was the arsonist that ignited the blazing, all-consuming firestorm we continue to suffer from and fight against to this very day — in every domain of the Church's life, bar none. It was Paul VI who unleashed the monsters from the abyss upon the Spouse of Christ, and watched impotently as the creatures he gave life to seized her in their rabid, ravenous, dagger-toothed, froth-filled maws, seeking to tear her flesh and rend her apart limb from limb, and swallow whole that which was left. Without doubt or question, it was Paul VI who did the most irreparable, unrecoverable and incalculable damage to the Church, the agonizing effects of which have tortured generations of the Faithful from his own Pontificate to the current one. Francis is his scion, who came forth from his ideological and theological loins and carries his spiritual DNA, and is only enacting upon the edicts of destruction Paul VI approved and mandated for the Church, which Francis has embraced and advanced as his own, seeing his task as a continuation of Paul VI's work, and striving mightily to progress it to its ultimate conclusion.

Number #2 on my list would be Pope John XXIII, who, under the auspices of Satan and his collaborating minions, conceived the false need for an Ecumenical Council in the first place, the convoking of which created the incubating environment for the seeds of diabolical madness that was birthed out of the heart of its many and varied sessions; seeds which matured into heresy and apostasy, and brought forth a brimming harvest of iniquity and rebellion. It is clear then, that these 3 Roman Pontiffs have been, and remain, the primary instruments of Lucifer in the fulfillment of his lust to overcome and obliterate the Church, and are the chief ones who have played the preeminent role in the ongoing attempts to coerce the Church onto the Road of Perdition. Therefore, we must conclude that the gaping hole in the center of the hull of Saint Peter's Barque, through which the dark, muddy, unclean waters of evil and abomination now gush explosively, threatening to capsize the ship and jeopardizing the immortal souls of all on board, was created on this wise: John XXIII conceptualized and sketched out the location for the hole, Paul VI supplied the tools to form it, and now Francis has taken up those tools and punched the monstrous hole straight through to the sea.

And so, because of the dire, deadly predicament we find ourselves in today, ONLY the Master of the sea Himself can save us. For ONLY He can calm the sea, heal and seal the ship's breach, and raise up unto us a holy, faithful Captain again, to lead us through clean, clear waters to the Heavenly shores of Salvation. May it please God to make it so.

If you allow me to give my opinion, I believe that both pontificates cannot be compared. Many will say, using logic, that Francis is worse, and will affirm that Paul VI, despite the damage he caused in other aspects such as the liturgical aspect, with his encyclicals "Sacerdotalis caelibatus" and "Humanae vitae" had positive things that cannot be extract from the current pontificate. I, in my ignorance, am not so sure. I ask the question: if Bergoglio had been elected pope in 1963, would he have gone as far as he has today? If Montini had been elected pope in 2013, what would his pontificate have been like? I believe that both pontificates have been disastrous and did a lot of damage to the Church in their own way and in their context. The difference is that Paul VI's successors tried to restore the damage, who knows what will happen to Francis' successors.