FSSPX Distances Itself from Monsignor Viganó

View this video by Fr. Anthony Cekada:
Marcel Lefebvre: Sedevacantist

Archbishop Lefebvre, whom I greatly esteem, certainly flirted with "sede-vacantism."

It is well known that this group of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) betrayed Archbishop Lefebvre in 2012, and that is why there are currently independent priests who have come out of this group and who fight against them because, instead of fighting against the modernist heresy, they tolerate heretical ideas contrary to the Catholic faith. The priests who have become independent accept all the popes of Vatican II but doubt the legitimacy of Bergoglio. All of them are, like Vigano, conditionally ordained. Archbishop Lefebvre himself would not recognize these modernists of Saint Pius X (FSSPX). Among them there is a lust for power rather than zeal for the truth. In fact, this group accepts that Bergoglio violates mainly the First and Second Commandments along with all the others as long as they are recognized by Bergoglio as valid. They have sold themselves to the kingdom of the antichrist and together with Bergoglio they have preferred to betray Christ and the Church.

Bergoglio spreads Gender Ideology, calls homosexual prostitutes transvestites Girls, and perverts young people in complicity with the anti-Catholic industry of Disney by making a Pro Gay documentary where he maliciously attacks the laws of God and the Church and deceives a girl "who believes herself to be some days men and other days women" BINARY' that the Christian faithful who try to correct her using Scripture are "infiltrators", in addition he participates in a secular children's party where a transvestite who perverted children was invited, he has covered up for several homosexual predators, in addition it is known that his apostasy began in Argentina where he supported gay adoptions, surrogacy, sacrilegious communions for homosexual couples, adultery, etc. And yet the Fraternity prefers to continue to recognize the gay activist Jorge Mario Bergoglio as 'pope' and to desecrate the mass by naming a public and contumacious heretic. And the Fraternity prefers to persecute Vigano.

Vigano was not allowed to portray Bergoglio as someone who had committed sexual abuse! If the SSPX had appealed to this, I would understand that. But this one Pope worshiped an idol and is consciously overriding traditional and biblical sexual morality little by little. Anyone who, urged by their conscience, denies the papal office to this one pope out of concern for the salvation of souls does not belong to the group of sedevacantists. The SSPX makes it very, very easy for itself with the term “Sedevacantism”.

"On the other hand, as bad as it was when Mgr Lefebvre rebelled [and Viganó was a happy employee of the Holy See], what is happening now in the Church is at least ten times worse"
---
Really?

The reality check below: [times of Msgr. Lefebvre (PVI/JPII) - nowadays (F)]
NOM revolution: YES - YES
Active fight against the Roman Rite: YES - YES
"Per tutti/4 All "consecration"": YES - YES
Treating Catholics that want to preserve traditional rites of the Holy Roman Church as schismatics: YES - YES
Treating schismatics as "sister Churches": YES - YES
Treating heretical communities as being in "imperfect communion" and "means of salvation": YES - YES
wild ecumenism with Protestants: YES - YES
wild ecumenism with Jews and Muslims (Abraham faith/religions fraternity BS): YES - YES
Spirit of Assisi: YES - YES
"ecological conversion": YES - YES
Developing novelties of Vatican II: YES - YES
collegialism aka synodalism aka sovietism: YES - YES
Promoting the universal brotherhood of men: YES - YES
allowing idols to churches: YES - YES
Supporting globalisation and americanism: YES - YES
Jeffrey Sachs help in writing encyclicals: YES - YES
finding pastoral exceptions for divorced and remarried: YES - YES
and so on...