Cardinal Müller Denying Reality

On May 25th Raymond Arroyo interviewed on EWTN Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. During the interview Müller praised the ambiguous document Amoris Laetitia explaining that it does not and cannot change the Church teaching on marriage.

Arroyo replied: “Does it trouble you that so many Bishops’ Conferences are at odds in their interpretations of Amoris Laetiita?” Müller replies: “It is not good that the Bishops’ Conferences are making official interpretations of the Pope.”

Reminding Müller that the pope himself approved the interpretation of Argentinian bishops, who allow Communion for adulterers, Arroyo states: “That seems to give credence to the absolute opposite of your interpretation that nothing has changed.”

At this point Müller sidetracks, “Bishops interpret the Pope, the Pope interprets the bishops”, adding that after two synods and a final document the discussion should be "finished".

Picture: Gerhard Ludwig Müller on EWTN, #newsWarjebiobi

LikeShare

jd1961

May 31, 2017

Come completely out of that closet "Cardinal", be brave.

Lisi Sterndorfer

May 29, 2017

ARROYO: And what is your opinion? Did they have Holy Orders, or no?
MÜLLER: No. Not possible.
(equal "not possible" as the adulterer-communion)More

ARROYO: And what is your opinion? Did they have Holy Orders, or no?
MÜLLER: No. Not possible.

(equal "not possible" as the adulterer-communion)

Lionel L. Andrades

May 29, 2017

MULLER'S INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FALSE, IRRATIONAL,NON TRADITIONAL WITH BAD PHILOSOPHY CREATING A NEW THEOLOGY
Cardinal Muller's interpretation of Vatican Council II was false, irrational, a deception and bad philosophy.It is non traditional and heretical.It is the false conclusion made with a false premise.He assumes that there invisible cases of the baptism of desire, for example, so there is known salvation outside the Church for him.We can see and meet people saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), without the baptism of water, for him, and so there is known salvation outside the Church.So every one does not need to enter the Catholic Church as a member is his false conclusion.Outside the the Church there issalvation he told Edward Pentin in the interview for the National Catholic Register when Pentin asked him about the dogma EENS.
No one protested after reading that interview.
No one protested since about every one assumes invisible cases are visible and so there is known salvation outside the Church.
Similarly in March 2016 no one protested when Pope Benedict XVI said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Since for him there was a development with Vatican Council II.No one issued a statement saying there is no development with Vatican Council II since there is no known salvation outside the Church.There are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to EENS ( Feeneyite) in 2016.So Vatican Council II (Feeneyite-invisible cases are only invisible) was not a development of rupture with EENS according to the 16th century magisterium.
NO ONE WILL PROTEST
Similarly no one will protest and correct Cardinal Muller's interview on May 25 when he indicated that the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) has to interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise.
This has to be accepted by all Catholics.

Jungerheld

May 29, 2017

He is right that the conversation "should" be finished and in fact, it could be finished, no doubt for varying reasons leaders wish it were finished, yet it remains unfinished. Why?

Josefine

2May 29, 2017

Cardinal Müller denying reality...