Revisionist Claim: "The Real Revolution Happened Under John Paul II”

In a brazen move, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, the controversial president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, put the blame for Amoris Laetitia on John Paul II claiming that the "real revolution" for the divorced and remarried happened under him, not under Francis.

Talking to cruxnow.com Paglia claimed that before John Paul II's Familiaris Consortio (1981) “it wasn’t that the divorced and remarried just couldn’t get Communion, it was they were practically excommunicated and expelled.” And: “They were outsiders. After John Paul, everybody was inside the house”. Paglia even calls Francis “the best interpreter of John Paul II”.

In reality, Familiaris Consortio 84 unambiguously reaffirms the Catholic teaching based upon Sacred Scripture that divorced and remarried persons are not admitted to receive Holy Communion. The reason: According to the Gospel, divorced and remarried persons live in mortal sin. Receiving the Eucharist in the state of mortal sin is another mortal sin.

Picture: Vincenzo Paglia, #newsKjbsmjmcbi

LikeShare

Lionel L. Andrades

Oct 2, 2017

When Cardinal Ratzinger in the Catechism of the Catholic Church referred to the three conditions for mortal sin this was part of the Obfuscation Principle which is there also in Amoris Laetitia.Credit for the Catechism's Philosophical Subjectivism should go to Cardinal Ratzinger and not the ailing pontiff.
Possibly Pope John Paul II asked Cardinal Ratzinger to issue Veritatis Splendor which says a mortal sin is always a mortal sin and the outward action indicates the inner thinking.Manifest mortal sin is a mortal sin however you may want to apply the three conditions of mortal sin and pretend you know who is not going to Hell or could receive the Eucharist.
Cardinal Ratzinger supported Philosophical Subjectivism in morals and also in faith(salvation).He not only could judge who in mortal sin was not breaking the moral law but he could judge cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible as being manifest exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The invisible was visible for him. Invisible people were visible to him.
So Mons. Paglia will not say all Jews and Muslims in Italy are on the way to Hell since he knows of people saved outside the Church with the baptism of desire etc, even though he cannot name any one.Neither can he say that Italians in manifest mortal sin, at the time of their death, are on the way to Hell.Since there could be theoretical and speculative exceptions which must be considered by him.Possibilities and theories are objective exceptions to the moral law on mortal sin.Similarly subjective and personally unknown cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, as it was known for example to the missionaries in the 16th century.
They've got it all figured out.

en.news

Revisionist Claim: "The Real Revolution Happened Under John Paul II”

Lionel L. Andrades

mariamargarita

GTVisrockin

aderito