There's some irony in a paedo calling
anyone "fem". Notably a paedo disproven by his own
source. Jews were involved in
0.24% of the total slavery, and mainlyin colonial Brazil. This is how you anti-Semites define "significant":
Zero percent. You need a
decimal point before you can even
start recording the impact of Jews in the African slave trade in only one part of the world.
First some background:
"Be Ye Bigot" (direct quote)
"Talmud Jews were significant merchants, in the African slave trade."(referring to the
entirety of the African slave trade)
"UV" (citing a source)
--"The numbers just aren’t there to support the view," ..."
Jews were involved, but to an insignificant degree. "(referring to the
entirety of the African slave trade)
"Be Ye Bigot" (citing a source)
According to Arnold Wiznitzer's "Jews in Colonial Brazil" ..."The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews."(referring
ONLY to Colonial Brazil)
...and Colonial Brazil is not
the entirey of the African slave trade. MOST of it went elsewhere. Deliberately dishonesty on your part.
Now let's talk numbers, and I'm using just YOUR source. I also linked it up top since you were too busy playing with yourself to bother. Yeah, that's another
"uh oh correction".
--"According to one well-regarded census,
9.6 million Africans arrived alive in the so-called "New World" from the 16th century through the 19th century."--
That isn't the
entirety of the African slave trade. Millions more were bought by Muslim slavers. The Muslim slave trade in Africans didn't stop until around
1969. This is just the
transatlantic slave trade. Also wiki places the number higher.
--"Between 1650 and 1900, 10.2 million enslaved Africans arrived in the Americas"-
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_tradeBritannica supports the higher figure, as well
www.britannica.com/topic/transatlantic-slave-tradeBut let's stick with your source just for consistency.
Your source states: "Nearly
4 million went to Brazil, the largest single devourer of African labor."
So now we're down to less than half the total number of transatlantic African slaves. That number includes ALL slaves, including the ones Jews
didn't have anything to do with.
Your source narrows that number down further: "More than
23,000 Africans were shipped to Brazil between 1636 to 1645, Wiznitzer says,"
So from
9.6 million total transatlantic African slaves you're down to
23,000 with documented Jewish involvement. That's quoting YOUR source and YOUR author.
So (your words)
"Talmud Jews were significant merchants, in the African slave trade." A whoppingly signficiant
0.24% in Brazil which was itself
less than half the transatlantic total.
We're not done.
Your source states: "As Arnold Wiznitzer has pointed out, Jews in Amsterdam owned as much as 10 percent of the stock in the Dutch West India Company, the great slave-shipping enterprise that helped launch the Netherlands to international commercial prominence during the 1600s"
Wow 10% was owned by da joooz! It's a pity we can't get you to play Russian Roulette with a "signficant"
ten percent chance of surviving.
:DSo
90% was
owned by non-Jews. For some perspective, Russian Roulette with five out of six is only 83% .
Your source also states: "The Catholic French, however, ordered
the expulsion of all Jews from these islands in
1685, thus virtually ending their role in the trade. "
Slavery did not end in Martinique until
1848. Slavery was going for another
203 years after the Jews had been expelled
Slavery did not end in Guadeloupe until
1794. Slavery was going for another
109 years after the Jews had been expelled
...and what was the time frame Mr Wiznitzer covered? 1636 to 1645.
9 yearsTL;DR Your own chosen source discredits your claim of "significant" involvement. Anti-Semitism might be a hobby for you, but we both know where your true appetites lie.
;-)
