Charlie Kirk: “Mr. Prevost, the new pope, was retweeting George Floyd propaganda”
MAGA melts down over ‘WOKE MARXIST POPE’
“I do think one of the dark horses — and unfortunately one of the most progressive — is Cardinal Prevost... he's certainly on the shortlist,” Bannon told Piers Morgan last week about the prospect of the first American pope.
The evil Catholics who supported Bergoglio's rebellion against God are like the apostate angels who joined Lucifer in rebelling against God. A mere angel of a minor rank bravely dared to defy Lucifer and defend God's rights. May Saint Michael the Archangel defend us in this fight against the rebellion against God, which Bergoglio's disciple, Robert Prevost, continues.
Prevost supports sinful same-sex civil unions and gay adoption
Apostate nun Lucía Caram knew that Prevost would …
Prevost condone homosexual behavior and promotes apostate gay activists
Prevost is calling the Church to accept homosexual behavior
Martin Luther's thinking was not exactly the same because the heresiarch Luther, whom Bergoglio called a witness of the faith, attacked a legitimate pope and the legitimate Church. The Church has anathematized those who support heretics. Bergoglio's heresy has been classified as the greatest blasphemy because he equated false religions invented by men with the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ and challenged the Holy Trinity.
Bergoglio's apostasy has reached such a low point that he can no longer even be considered a Christian.
And let us remember that Bergoglio's apostasy began in Argentina. And the Magisterium of the Church has decreed that the election of a heretic who has previously strayed from the faith as pope is invalid and null.
The Horror!
A Buenos Aires journalist …
Ironically, those (liberal) Catholics who use Martin Luther's argument to defend the apostate Jorge Bergoglio should remember precisely what Bergoglio himself called those who persecuted the (heretical) Protestants (which includes themselves) "possessed by the devil."
Francis asks for Pentecostals Forgiveness: …
One more comment from la verdad prevalece
They use (liberal Catholics) a false rhetorical question, since it's not about "judging a pope," but rather a heretic invalidly elected pope. And that authority resides in the Magisterium of the Church, which has decreed in perpetuity that the elevation of a heretic is invalid and null. If all those who occupied the chair of Peter had been recognized as popes, we wouldn't have had a list of antipopes. And we would have had the names of several popes reigning at the same time, as happened in the Western Schism, when Catholic faithful did not know who the legitimate pope was for almost forty years.
“If my pastor starts saying crazy things I find a new pastor. So if your pope starts saying crazy things, maybe he’s not the Pope.” Martin Luther's thought exacly, "find or start another church." I understand Charlie saying this because he was apparently on an honest journey from the world of the protestant revolution. But there is no excuse for any faithful Catholic to hold this wicked position.
Sorry, I should have said, “can a Pope teach heresy?”. Obviously not. Now please don’t tell me we cannot decide what blatant heresy is. If it were so what is the point of the Ten Commandments? (Since we would not be able to discern right from wrong, false from true none of God’s covenants would bind).
"You can shout from the rooftops the truth of a definitive doctrine, but not the judgment of a particular person"
---
Showing that ones teaches heresy or favors heresy is not "the judgement of a particular person". For example, he may be not compos mentis but it does not change the fact of heresy/favoring heresy.
A very logical and well researched piece on the papacy. I hope all Catholics will read and digest the wisdom that Charlie Kirk presented to us, even though he was not a Catholic.