The Church Was Already Rotten Before The Council - Father Weinandy Sharply Contradicts John XXIII
Capuchin Father Thomas Weinandy is “uncomfortable" with the conclusion that Vatican II is "the direct source and cause of the present disheartening state of the Church.” A critic of Francis, Weinandy …More
Capuchin Father Thomas Weinandy is “uncomfortable" with the conclusion that Vatican II is "the direct source and cause of the present disheartening state of the Church.”
A critic of Francis, Weinandy doesn't deny the huge damage done to the Church in the last decades (InsideTheVatican.com, July 27).
However, for him it's naïve to think that so many priests and faithful were people of deep faith, and then, overnight, were corrupted by the Council and its spirit, and left.
Therefore, he argues that the Council only provided the occasion for the already existing difficulties to come to light, "they were already there, deeply embedded within the Church, prior to the Council.”
Weinandy's thesis sharply contradicts John XXIII who admitted in his Opening Speech for Vatican II (October 11, 1962) that there was no lack of false doctrines, opinions, or dangerous concepts, but then explained that "these things so openly conflict with the right norms of honesty, and have borne such lethal fruits …More
A critic of Francis, Weinandy doesn't deny the huge damage done to the Church in the last decades (InsideTheVatican.com, July 27).
However, for him it's naïve to think that so many priests and faithful were people of deep faith, and then, overnight, were corrupted by the Council and its spirit, and left.
Therefore, he argues that the Council only provided the occasion for the already existing difficulties to come to light, "they were already there, deeply embedded within the Church, prior to the Council.”
Weinandy's thesis sharply contradicts John XXIII who admitted in his Opening Speech for Vatican II (October 11, 1962) that there was no lack of false doctrines, opinions, or dangerous concepts, but then explained that "these things so openly conflict with the right norms of honesty, and have borne such lethal fruits …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
The problems in the Church existed more among certain theologians than among the laity. It was, however, evident that 1, 2, 3 By the Numbers Church, with its over emphasis on method, was running out of steam.
Unfortunately, the Ecu-maniacs were the only ones with an agenda on reform.More
The problems in the Church existed more among certain theologians than among the laity. It was, however, evident that 1, 2, 3 By the Numbers Church, with its over emphasis on method, was running out of steam.
Unfortunately, the Ecu-maniacs were the only ones with an agenda on reform.
Unfortunately, the Ecu-maniacs were the only ones with an agenda on reform.
HerzMariae
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This is John Paul II
Ecumenism, in 1986 Assisi, also in 1986 JP2 speaks of a New World Order at Ghandi’s tomb, 1999: kisses the Qu’ran and in 2000: JP2 sits on a throne (with the ambiguous Inverted Cross) at Korazin.More
This is John Paul II
Ecumenism, in 1986 Assisi, also in 1986 JP2 speaks of a New World Order at Ghandi’s tomb, 1999: kisses the Qu’ran and in 2000: JP2 sits on a throne (with the ambiguous Inverted Cross) at Korazin.
Ecumenism, in 1986 Assisi, also in 1986 JP2 speaks of a New World Order at Ghandi’s tomb, 1999: kisses the Qu’ran and in 2000: JP2 sits on a throne (with the ambiguous Inverted Cross) at Korazin.
Be Ye Separate
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Jp2, he led pagans: Voodoo believers, Hindus, American Indians... in the prayer ceremony at Assisi.
The Vatican 2 revolt, produced Nostra Aetate, in which the subversive bishops praised Muhammadans, and wrote favorably of pagans.
Previous to the unfaithful modernist V2 popes, for 1,900 years our Church never endorsed praying with demonic pagans or False Francis' worship of mother earth.
St. Paul, …More
Jp2, he led pagans: Voodoo believers, Hindus, American Indians... in the prayer ceremony at Assisi.
The Vatican 2 revolt, produced Nostra Aetate, in which the subversive bishops praised Muhammadans, and wrote favorably of pagans.
Previous to the unfaithful modernist V2 popes, for 1,900 years our Church never endorsed praying with demonic pagans or False Francis' worship of mother earth.
St. Paul, "Bear not the yoke with unbelievers."
The Vatican 2 revolt, produced Nostra Aetate, in which the subversive bishops praised Muhammadans, and wrote favorably of pagans.
Previous to the unfaithful modernist V2 popes, for 1,900 years our Church never endorsed praying with demonic pagans or False Francis' worship of mother earth.
St. Paul, "Bear not the yoke with unbelievers."
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"The Vatican 2 revolt, produced Nostra Aetate, in which the subversive bishops praised Muhammadans, and wrote favorably of pagans..."
Was Christ "subversive" as well? :P Matthew 5: 44-47 "But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you:
That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise …More
"The Vatican 2 revolt, produced Nostra Aetate, in which the subversive bishops praised Muhammadans, and wrote favorably of pagans..."
Was Christ "subversive" as well? :P Matthew 5: 44-47 "But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you:
That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.
For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this?
And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this?"
Showing charity to your enemies is the first step to opening their hearts and their minds to the Good News. @Be Ye Stupid .
Of course, you know nothing of that. You're too busy misinterpreting St. Paul. Paul himself explains how we should treat the enemies of The Church in Romans 12: 20.
"But if thy enemy be hungry, give him to eat; if he thirst, give him to drink. For, doing this, thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head."
So Jesus contradicted your opinion of the Council and Paul contradicted your misinterpretation his writing. Two for two, you blew it.
Was Christ "subversive" as well? :P Matthew 5: 44-47 "But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you:
That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.
For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this?
And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this?"
Showing charity to your enemies is the first step to opening their hearts and their minds to the Good News. @Be Ye Stupid .
Of course, you know nothing of that. You're too busy misinterpreting St. Paul. Paul himself explains how we should treat the enemies of The Church in Romans 12: 20.
"But if thy enemy be hungry, give him to eat; if he thirst, give him to drink. For, doing this, thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head."
So Jesus contradicted your opinion of the Council and Paul contradicted your misinterpretation his writing. Two for two, you blew it.
Be Ye Separate
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Writing favorably of demonic religions, and praying with their followers as JP2 did in Assisi, is not love of neighbor, it is destructive to them.
Preaching the Holy Word, that Christ Is King, is love of neighbor.
Preaching the Holy Word, that Christ Is King, is love of neighbor.
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
...that moment when you realize Christ prayed with non-believers every time he prayed in the Jewish Temple. :D Yeah, you really don't know your Scripture. Spend more time with Jesus, not with Jones.
Wichita Knight
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Fr. Weinady is spot on. Councils do not sprout up on a spontaneous whim. They are called to deal with forces already on the move.