It comes as no surprise that in one of the most moronic articles ever to disgrace the pages of the Guardian (already a thoroughly disgraced leftist rag), Kristina Keneally said some utterly incredible garbage, beginning with these words of wisdom:
"Every Muslim who speaks out is expected to own, explain and condemn any act carried out by Muslims worldwide.”
This comment is demonstrably false. When was the last time any of us heard a disciple of Muhammad condemn even the most barbaric acts of their fellow Muslims that occur with regularity in the Middle East and now even in Europe and the States?

As Egyptian-American human rights activist Nonie Darwish once rightly put it:
Western civilization has no idea that it is entrusted with the enormous responsibility of saving humanity. This is much more important than saving endangered species and more essential than stopping climate change, because if Islam wins, all such Western efforts will cease, because they are not Islamic values. The West must never be tolerant of an intolerant ideology that seeks to destroy it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Setting the Muslim question aside, Kristina's got much bigger problems.
Kristina Keneally claims “I’m still a Catholic and a feminist" (feminist = a witch with male genitalia). From her writing there is little doubt that she is indeed a “feminist” but the Catholic part... not so much. To wit:

Kristina's view on Homosexuality
Our church condemns homosexual people as sinful – and defines them as disordered – if they act on their sexual orientation, even in mutually loving, monogamous relationships.
The truth:
The Church doesn't condemn anyone (Just ask il Papa) but believes in and defends marriage as the unique life-long sexual relationship between one man and one woman. Any of us — homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual or whatever — condemn ourselves if we knowingly act on sexual orientations outside the sanctity of marriage. Christianity in all of its forms has always upheld the biblical truth that marriage is between a man and a woman. So there is absolutely nothing to change here. Indeed, any change is nothing other than the destruction of historical Christian moral teaching.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kristina's view on Divorce
Our church tells divorced people they have failed as Christians – even if the marriage was abusive or if their spouse was cheating on them – and denies them access to the sacraments.
The truth:
The Church recognizes that it may be necessary for married couples to separate, particularly if the marriage was abusive. Also that marriage can be examined to see whether it was a valid sacrament or not. The sin occurs if you “marry” someone else while you’re still married to your spouse. Commonly called Adultery.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Regrettably today many people (including some in the Church hierarchy) agree with poor Kristina. They see the Church’s teachings on human sexuality and the dignity of marriage as intolerable burdens. We need a reformation, not to change what the Church teaches, but to teach it better.

Bergoglio: I was very friendly with Bishop Gregory Venables, very friendly. But there’s another experience: In the north of Argentina there are the Anglican missions with the aborigines, and the Anglican Bishop and the Catholic Bishop there work together and teach. And when people can’t go on Sunday to the Catholic celebration they go to the Anglican, and the Anglicans go to the Catholic, because they don’t want to spend Sunday without a celebration; and they work together. And here, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith knows this. And they engage in charity together. And the two Bishops are friends and the two communities are friends.
Pope Leo XIII
– It breaks away from the Apostolic succession

Ordinations enacted according to the Anglican rite are invalid and entirely void

And so, assenting entirely to the decrees of all the Pontiffs, our predecessors, in this case, and confirming them most fully and, as it were, renewing them by Our authority, of Our own initiative and certain knowledge We pronounce and declare that ordinations enacted according to the Anglican rite have hitherto been and are invalid and entirely void. (Denzinger-Hünermann 3319. Leo XIII, Apostolic Letter Curae et Caritatis, September 13, 1896)