"Perennial Doctrine" or "Novelty"? "Blessing" Without "Blessing" and "Couple" Without "Couple"

Tucho Fernández has issued a desperate "clarification" of the propaganda piece "Sodoma supplicans" to help the confused public "better understand its meaning and purpose". Here are some of the main …More
Tucho Fernández has issued a desperate "clarification" of the propaganda piece "Sodoma supplicans" to help the confused public "better understand its meaning and purpose". Here are some of the main points he is likely to twist again in a next "clarification". These points, however, do not concern essential principles which Tucho either doesn't understand or doesn't believe in.
- "Fiducia supplicans" announces in number 41 that "no further responses are to be expected". Two weeks later Tucho publishes a long "clarification".
- A confused Tucho calls FS a "perennial doctrine" but also a "real novelty" and "real development" from what had been said before about blessings.
- Tucho offers a sample text for a blessing, while insisting that we cannot have a specific text for his homosexual pseudo-blessings.
Pictured here are two lesbians in a civil concubinage who received a public pseudo-blessing in a church in recent days.
#newsVqmktfoouh
Coenobium
The picture is a Catholic church in Lexington, Kentucky, hosting a “blessing” of a same-sex couple that had been civilly “married” for 22 years, citing the Vatican’s heterodox declaration Fiducia Supplicans.
Adrien
What strikes me on this picture is the stole with LGBT colours. I think it makes the ceremony liturgical if one has a specific garment for the ''blessing''.
Coenobium
The DDF tells us that diocesan bishops can discern for themselves how to apply Fiducia— but they can’t reject the Vatican directive. And if they have already rejected it, their stance “cannot be interpreted as doctrinal opposition.” Even if that’s what the bishops say it is?
Coenobium
Doctrinal opposition is impossible, the DDF tells us, “because the document is clear and definitive about marriage and sexuality.” Which might make you wonder why a clarification is necessary, and why so many bishops around the world have said the document is (at best) unclear.
la verdad prevalece
Saint Alphonsus Maria de Ligorio taught that priests when they are wicked are incorrigible, just as apostate angels sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. That is why the Virgin called these apostate priests in La Salette cesspools of impurity.
la verdad prevalece
St. Robert Bellarmine: "A manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others."
la verdad prevalece
Tucho's heretical anti-Catholic opinions that defy God's Laws and contradict Catholic Morals. He is a man accused of covering up for a predatory homosexual priest and is publicly recognized as a sodomite.
"God tolerates no example of conduct more from others than from priests when He sees those, whom He ordains for the improvement of others, give example of their own depravity." St. Gregory the Great
SonoftheChurch
You haven’t seen anything yet. Wait till you see the Holy Father standing there blessing a sodomite so-called “couple” himself. That’s when the excrement is going to really hit the proverbial fan. Save Thine Church, O Lord. And come quickly to the rescue of the Faithful.
De Profundis
“Thus, beyond the guidance provided above, no further responses should be expected about possible ways to regulate details or practicalities regarding blessings of this type” 17 days later a 2000+ response. What an utter fiasco.
De Profundis
The very fact that Fernandez combines "innovative" and "development" proves he doesn't know what "development" means.