"Sorry kid, JP2 and B16 never denied Catholic dogma."
Sorry Jimmy, The Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is
Catholic dogma. According to his critics, Benedict XVI denied that.
The necessity of baptism for salvation is
Catholic dogma. According to his critics, JP II denied that."Maybe you've got a different copy of Canon Law, but 751 buttresses everything I've ever said about Bergoglio."
That's why you never quote it
how it "buttresses everything" you ever said. That's what I do
to show you're wrong. I did that two years ago
when you were posting under your (now banned) "Zecharia" account. Like so:
Canon Law 751 states "Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt."
Why is this distinction between an obstinate
act (denial or doubt) and an act per se
"Obstinate" shows a deliberate course of action in the face of correction, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."
Citation (Merriam-Webster dictionary entry: "Obstinate")
denial or an obstinate
doubt shows that:
a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.
Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) He has certainly expressed his views.
b.)-d.) have not.
Who has the temporal authority to represent the Church in correcting the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?
The author fails to say, yet this is vital for establishing even a superficial, much less legally valid, accusation of heresy according to Canon Law 751.
That's me quoting Canon Law. That's me showing how Canon Law applies to this case. You don't do that because you can't do that.
"And more than that, there cannot be an expanded Papal Office to include a "Pope Emeritus"."
Since Benedict resigned it isn't a Papal Office. It's a title and one others forced upon him. Benedict himself said so:Benedict explained that when he initially stepped down he wanted to be called "Father Benedict" rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI, but "I was too weak at that point to enforce it."
"There is one pope, he holds office and ministry, he cannot keep one."
A title others give him is not the office or the ministry. The title others give him "emeritus" shows he is a FORMER pope. That's what any "emeritus" is someone who USED TO BE something."And thus, Benedict 16 never properly resigned..."
Utter garbage Zero support shown as always from you. Just like your endless blather about how Canon Law supports you. Zero support shown. As usual, there's never any evidence backing your claim.Oh boy, Jimmy's using Loads O' Bold! What's "old news" is you've banned more times than anyone else on this site for spouting this kind of garbage."I find it so intriguing that you're rather passive about Bergoglio's many heresies..."
I find it intriguing you keep choosing to make the same fallacies of circular reasoning. It isn't ignorance on your part, it's deliberate wilfull supidity. You're not the arbiter of heresy as The Church uses the term.
You don't get to decide Benedict XVI and JP II weren't "heretics" for their errors but Francis supposedly is. Where on earth did you pick up such an insane delusion YOU speak for The Church?"You'd rather have a demon squatting on the chair of St. Peter, actively destroying the TLM you're so proud to attend..."
The same one you
don't attend. :D
Always cracks me up how you'll raise the very Mass you're just as quick to sneer at. Understandable hypocrisy.
You don't care about the TLM. You care about "Bergoglio". The TLM is just an excuse for you to justify your insane hatred of the Pope."turning the Church into a Lutheran abomination"
If it is, we can thank Vatican Council II for that. Your attitude here is a perfect example of that "Lutheran abomination". Two Popes state error after error, but they're not heretics because YOU say so. The latest pope states error after error but he supposedly a heretic because YOU say so. No, Jimmy. YOU don't get to make that call."Strong cognitive dissonance, strong fear, and an intentional aversion to truth."
Cool story, Dr. Phil. Cognitive dissonance is YOU picking and choosing which Popes are allowed by YOU to spout errors and which are not. You live in Double Standards City, Jimmy.