The only "red herrings" you know about are the ones you eat Rafał_Ovile
The "Sovereign Pontiff" is Francis
, not Benedict XVI
. Benedict XVI quit
. He's said so repeatedly
. He said it before his resignation went into effect, he said it during in his resignation, he said it after his resignation.
Your yammering about "defmormed conscience" doesn't change that. No, I don't have "blind obedience" to the Pope, either. I have said so dozens of times and idiots like you just keep repeating that same old lie.
I recognize Francis is
the Pope. So do many other people who dislike the man and what he does and what he stands for. Cardinal Sarah, Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Zen, Cardinal Pell, Archbishop Vigano. All these men make the same things clear, the same things I
do. 1.) Francis is the Pope 2.) Francis is a bad Pope 3.) Francis has bad ideas as Pope..
There is nothing erronious about my philosophy. While I have not spoken to those Cardinals and Archbishops, they share the same philosophy I do. Accepting who the Pope IS does not require accepting what the Pope DOES."For example, Nuremberg trials condemned and sentenced such criminals who obediently participated in evil."
Hello Godwin's Law. :P
Since you mentioned "Nuremberg" I will use that era as an example of my position.
As you know, in 1933 German president Hindenburg appointed a new chancellor. We all know who that man was. ;-)
Like Mr. Trump, he made Poland great again. :D
You are trying to claim the earlier man, Kurt von Schleicher, was STILL the real chancellor. He was not. Hindenburg appointed someone else
. The Vatican Curia elected someone else
von Schlicher was not chancellor anymore and Ratzinger was not Pope anymore.
I recognize who that new chancellor was. I recognize who the new Pope is. So does history. I am not participating or collaborating when I acknowledge a fact.
Also, you should review your history. Nuremberg did NOT condemn or sentence anyone
simply for recognizing who was running Germany because that is not the same thing as participation.