"There you howling accusations of lies again."On the contrary,
@Thors Catholic Hammer . I'll be howling when I bold-text most of a post the way
you like to. But I am publicly accusing you of being a liar.
You claimed Benedict's book was "private".
That is a lie. It's readily available on Amazon.
"truly miserable people like you"Let's see how long it takes before
you complain how you're the victim of "vitriol" "abusive posts" "aggression" and "intimidation" when you're mocked for being an idiot.
"...the critical distinction between a popes private opinions and official magisterial papal teaching."I asked you to cite Canon Law showing this distinction.
You haven't'. You won't. You make up these imaginary "canonical sounding" distinctions out of thin air. By now I can tell by your writing style when you're telling a lie.
The qualifications always start padding out your claims... "an official magisterial papal"... etc. etc. etc. You add these verbabl back-doors so you can run out them later. Oh
that heresy isn't an
official teaching. And
that heresy isn't a
magisterial teaching and
that heresy isn's something else and so on.
The
other give-away is when you start using passive voice to create support for your claim:
"This distinction has always been recognized." Recognized by
whom? Your fantasy supporters. If "this distinction has always been recognized." then you should find it an easy matter to
cite Canon Law the way you like to do when you're claiming Benedict didn't really resign.
Cite Canon Law or your claim is outed as another lie."Once again I ask you to post a single doctrinal heresy that was officially promulgated by a sitting pope via his office as teacher."This again?
:D First, YOU need to
cite canon law where all these imaginary qualifications even exist: "officially promulgated by a sitting pope via his office as teacher".
Benedict
has undoubtedly taught and advanced heresy as a
"sitting Pope". His books are rife with them.
"it has never happened and you flounder about in a morass of sedevacantist websites"Usual lies from a proven liar.
I repost the links to sites dedicated to showing a Pope's heresy, you lie and say I
haven't posted any, then you baww the sites are "sedevacantist". How would you know that unless you
visited them, hmmm? You see? You catch yourself in your
own lies.
It's also a genetic fallacy. Attack the information, not the source! Like the info here:
novusordowatch.org/…/deniers-of-the-…www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/RazResArt.pdfYou've obviously
visited the sites, you can't
refute the heresies previous popes have advanced because they are what they are. So you do what you always do.
You lie. They don't count, they weren't "officially" (qualified with more imaginary qualifications on top of more qualifications) taught and so on.
As for your "Amoris Laetitia" claims. You'd better take them up with Cardinal Burke.
novusordowatch.org/…/burke-francis-n…Simply put, you're a
liar. You claiming
anything at this point requires independent verification.
I haven't forgotten how you claimed Benedict XVI "still wears his Papal ring". That's what I'm talking about. You made that up. He doesn't. You lied. All you ever do lie and repeat the lies hoping they'll "stick" if you parrot them on every post..
Seriously Crackers, it's boring and dishonest,